Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:56:57.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inactivation of Herbicides by Activated Carbon and other Adsorbents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Coffey  and
G. F. Warren
David L. Coffey
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A root bioassay was used to compare the adsorption of herbicides by activated carbon with that of muck soil, bentonite clay, a cation exchange resin, and an anion exchange resin. The effectiveness of different adsorbents was determined by comparing the concentrations of herbicide required to give 50% root inhibition of the test plant. Of eight herbicides tested, six were more strongly adsorbed by activated carbon than by any of the other adsorbents. The relative amount of adsorption by activated carbon as measured by the reduction in biological activity was as follows: isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)-carbamate (CIPC) > α,α,α,trifluro-2,6-dinitro-N, N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) > 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) > N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenylacetamide (diphenamid) > dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) > 4,6-dinitro-o-sec-butylphenol (DNBP) > 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben). The biological activity of 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium salt (paraquat), a cationic herbicide, was not reduced by activated carbon, but was reduced by bentonite clay and the cation exchange resin. DNBP was more strongly adsorbed by the anion exchange resin than by activated carbon. Desorption from activated carbon varied greatly for the herbicides tested. The most readily desorbed herbicide was 2,4-D while CIPC and DNBP showed little or no desorption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 16 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1966. Persistence in soil of dichlobenil and EPTC applied for quackgrass control in ornamentals. Proc. NEWCC 20:630–631.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, J. F. 1967. Improving herbicide selectivity in transplanted crops with root dips of activated carbon. Proc. NEWCC. 21:64–70.Google Scholar
3. Audus, L. J. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil, p. 163–206. In Audus, L. J. (ed.). The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
4. Bailey, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning pesticide bioactivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brunauer, S. 1943. The Adsorption of Gases and Vapors. Oxford Press, London. 486 p.Google Scholar
6. Dubey, H. D., Sigafus, R. E., and Freeman, J. F. 1966. Effect of soil properties on the persistence of linuron and diphenamid in soils. Agron. J. 58:228–231.Google Scholar
7. Eshel, Y. and Warren, G. F. 1967. A simplified method of determining phytotoxicity, leaching and adsorption of herbicides in soils. Weeds 15:115–118.Google Scholar
8. Freed, V. H., Vernetti, J. and Montgomery, M. 1962. The soil behavior of herbicides as influenced by their physical properties. Proc. WWCC. 19:21–36.Google Scholar
9. Frissel, M. J. 1961. The adsorption of some organic compounds, especially herbicides, on clay minerals. Pudoc, Centrum Voor Landbouw Publikaties en Laudbouw Documentatie, Wageningen, Netherlands. 54 p.Google Scholar
10. Hance, R. J. 1965. Observations of the relationship between the adsorption of diuron and the nature of the adsorbent. Weed Res. 5:108–114.Google Scholar
11. Harris, C. I. and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Harris, C. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Helbig, W. A. 1962. Colloid Chemistry, Theoretical and Applied. Vol. 6. Reinhold, New York. 538 p.Google Scholar
14. Lambert, S. M., Porter, P. E., and Schieferstein, R. H. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to the soil. Weeds 13:185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Leopold, A. C., van Schaik, P., and Neal, Mary. 1960. Molecular structure and herbicide adsorption. Weeds 8:48–54.Google Scholar
16. Mortland, M. M. and Meggitt, W. F. 1966. Interaction of ethyl N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) with montmorillonite. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14:126–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weeds 14:117–121.Google Scholar
18. Roberts, H. A. and Wilson, B. J. 1965. Adsorption of chloropropham by different soils. Weed Res. 5:348–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Robinson, D. W. 1965. The use of adsorbents and simazine on newly planted strawberries. Weed Res. 5:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Sheets, T. J. and Danielson, L. L. 1960. Herbicides in soils. USDA, ARS. Publ. 20–9. p. 170–181.Google Scholar
21. Upchurch, R. P. 1966. Behavior of herbicides in soil. Residue Rev. 16:46–80.Google Scholar
22. Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L., Mason, D. D., and Kamprath, E. J. 1966. The correlation of herbicidal activity with soil and climatic factors. Weeds 14:42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Ward, T. M. and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. Role of the amino group in adsorption mechanisms. J. Agr. Food Chem. 13:334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Warren, G. F. 1956. The relative adsorption of several herbicides by widely differing soils. Proc. NCWCC. 13:5.Google Scholar
25. Weaver, R. J. 1947. Reaction of certain plant growth regulators with ion exchangers. Bot. Gaz. 109:72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D and prometone by clays, charcoal and an anion exchange resin. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 29:678–688.Google Scholar
27. Yen, Q. H. and Hilton, H. W. 1962. The adsorption of monuron and diuron by Hawaiian sugar cane soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:386–392.Google Scholar