Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:29:49.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicidal Persistence in Soil and its Effect on Purple Nutsedge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. E. Waters  and
D. S. Burgis
W. E. Waters
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Experiment Station, Bradenton, Florida
D. S. Burgis
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Experiment Station, Bradenton, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted to determine the soil persistence, crop toxicity, and effectiveness of four herbicides in controlling purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Excellent control of purple nutsedge was obtained with 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil) and good control was obtained with N-hydroxy-methyl-2,6-dichlorothiobenzamide. Both 3-iert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil (terbacil) and 5-bromo-3-teri-butyl-6-methyluracil were effective in controlling purple nutsedge, but maximum control was not obtained until 9 to 12 months after these chemicals were incorporated in the soil. Toxicity of all chemicals to beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, var. humilis L., Blue Lake), corn (Zea mays var. rugosa L., Golden Security), summer squash (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne, var. Yellow Crookneck), tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill., var. Flora-del), and gladiolus (Gladiolus hortulanus Bailey, var. Friendship) increased as the rates were increased and decreased with time after treatment. Infestation of purple nutsedge from escaping tubers increased as the herbicidal persistence decreased.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 149 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnsley, G. E. and Rosher, P. H. 1961. The relationship between herbicidal effect of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile and its persistence in the soil. Weed Res. 1:147–158.Google Scholar
2. Burgis, D. S. 1951. Nutgrass control with 2,4-D in Florida. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. S-38. 5 p.Google Scholar
3. Hauser, Ellis W. 1962. Establishment of nutsedge from space-planted tubers. Weeds 10:209–212.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, Ellis W. 1963. Response of purple nutsedge to amitrole, 2,4-D, and EPTC. Weeds 11:251–252.Google Scholar
5. Holt, E. C., Long, J. A., and Allen, W. W. 1962. The toxicity of EPTC to nutsedge. Weeds 10:103–105.Google Scholar
6. Loustalot, A. J., Muzik, T. J., and Cruzado, H. J. 1954. Studies on nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.) and its control. USDA, ARS Bull. 52:1–30.Google Scholar
7. Massini, P. 1961. Movement of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in soils and in plants in relation to its physical properties. Weed Res. 1:142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Miller, C. W., Demoranville, I. E., and Charig, A. J. 1966. Persistence of dichlobenil in cranberry bogs. Weeds 14:296–298.Google Scholar
9. Muzik, T. J. and Cruzado, H. J. 1953. The effect of 2,4-D on sprout formation in Cyperus rotundus . Amer. J. Bot. 40:507–512.Google Scholar
10. Pate, D. A., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., Davis, D. E., and Lawrence, J. M. 1964. Preliminary studies of C-14 labeled dichlobenil. Proc. SWC 17:337.Google Scholar
11. Sasser, J. M. and Locascio, S. J. 1966. Effects of several herbicides on nutsedge control. Proc. SWC 19:254–259.Google Scholar
12. Waters, W. E. 1965. Effects of several herbicides on gladiolus flower and corm production. Proc. SWC 18:237–245.Google Scholar