Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:12:23.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of Kochia scoparia, Salsola iberica, and Triticum aestivum varies with temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cathy A. Nord ,
Calvin G. Messersmith  and
John D. Nalewaja
Cathy A. Nord
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
Calvin G. Messersmith
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information on the influence of temperature on growth of spring Triticum aestivum L. (wheat) relative to Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. (kochia) and Salsola iberica Sennen and Pau (Russian thistle) could lead to more efficient weed management practices. An experiment was conducted to determine the growth of spring T. aestivum, K. scoparia, and S. iberica at 15, 23, and 30 C in growth chambers. Fresh weight at 15 C was greater for spring T. aestivum than for K. scoparia and S. iberica. Conversely, fresh weights at 23 or 30 C were greater for K. scoparia and S. iberica than for spring T. aestivum. Growth response to temperature is consistent with the physiological characteristics for photosynthesis of spring T. aestivum, a C3 plant, and K. scoparia and S. iberica, which are C4 plants. The results indicate that cool temperatures that usually occur for early-seeded spring T. aestivum would give spring T. aestivum the competitive advantage over K. scoparia or S. iberica. Additionally, growing degree day (GDD) equations for height development of K. scoparia and S. iberica were determined and could be used to determine the optimum time for postemergence herbicide application.

Keywords

Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. KCHSC, kochiaSalsola iberica Sennen and Pau SASKR, Russian thistleTriticum aestivum L. ‘Marshall,’ spring wheatCompetitiongrowing degree daysKCHSCSASKR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , August 1999 , pp. 435 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bell, A. R., Nalewaja, J. D., and Schooler, A. B. 1972. Response of kochia to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 20:458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, G. K. 1984. Competition and Control of Broadleaf Weeds in Spring Wheat. M.S. thesis. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND. 99 p.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Use of dummy variables in multiple regression. Pages 241–257 in Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. and Paul, R. N. 1983. Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:686–692.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Alaniz, M. A., and Lee, J. B. 1983. Seed germination characteristics of Kochia scoparia . J. Range Manage. 36:646–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, E. S., Wiese, A. F., Crutchfield, D. E., Chenault, E. W., and Lavake, D. 1985. The effect of temperature and rainfall on emergence and growth of eight weeds. Weed Sci. 33:165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, R. W., Tumosa, N., and Williams, K. 1981. Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant. Oecologia 48:371–376.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistant of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169–172.Google Scholar
Salhoff, C. R. and Martin, A. R. 1986. Kochia scoparia growth response to triazine herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:40–42.Google Scholar
Sailings, G. P., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1995. Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 43:95–102.Google Scholar
Stevens, O. A. 1943. Russian Thistle Life History and Growth. North Dakota Experimental Station Bull. 326, pp. 2–20.Google Scholar
Stoskopf, N. C. 1985. Wheat. Pages 386–402 in Cereal Grain Crops. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F. and Vandiver, C. W. 1970. Soil moisture effects on competitive ability of weeds. Weed Sci. 18:518–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Jarvi, K. J., Seymour, R. C., Witkowski, J. F., Danielson, S. D., and Wright, R. F. 1992. Annual Weed Growth Across Nebraska. Lincoln, NE: Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska. Research Bull. 314-F. 53 p.Google Scholar
Young, F. L. 1986. Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) growth and development in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:901–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. L. 1988. Effect of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) interference on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 36:594–598.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1972. Germination and establishment of Salsola in relation to seedbed environment. Agron. J. 64:214–218.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.Google Scholar