Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:21:00.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and development of spring crops in competition with oat in the dryland Mediterranean climate of eastern Washington

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2020

Misha R. Manuchehri Open the ORCID record for Misha R. Manuchehri [Opens in a new window] ,
E. Pat Fuerst ,
Stephen O. Guy ,
Bahman Shafii ,
Dennis L. Pittmann  and
Ian C. Burke
Misha R. Manuchehri*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
E. Pat Fuerst
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
Stephen O. Guy
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
Bahman Shafii
Affiliation:
Professor and Director of Statistical Programs, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
Dennis L. Pittmann
Affiliation:
Research Technologist III, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Misha R. Manuchehri, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK74078. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed management during spring crop production in eastern Washington presents many challenges. Many spring crops are weak competitors with weeds. In May of 2010 and 2011, two spring crop trials were initiated near Pullman, WA, to compare the relative competitiveness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) using cultivated oat (Avena sativa L.) as a surrogate for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) competition. The experiment was arranged as a split-block split-plot design with four replications. One set of main plots included three oat density treatments (0, 63, and 127 plants m−2), while a second set included each crop species. Crop species main plots were then split into subplots of two different seeding rates (recommended and doubled). Crop populations decreased as oat density increased and increased as crop seeding rate increased. As oat density increased, preharvest crop biomass decreased for all crops, while oat biomass and yield increased. Oat biomass and yield were greater in legume plots compared with cereal plots. Increasing oat density decreased yields for all crops, whereas doubling crop seeding rate increased yields for barley and wheat in 2010 and barley in 2011. Compared with legumes, cereals were taller, produced more biomass, and were more competitive with oat.

Keywords

Cropping systemsweed–crop competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 646 - 653
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Prashant Jha, Iowa State University

References

AACC International. 2010. Method 55-10.01: Tests weight per bushel. In Approved Methods of Analysis. 11th ed. St Paul, MN: AACC International. DOI: 10.1094/AACCIntMethod-55-10.01 Google Scholar
AACC International. 2011. Method 39-10.01: Near-infrared reflectance method for protein determination in small grains. In Approved Methods of Analysis. 11th ed. St Paul, MN: AACC International. DOI: 10.1094/AACCIntMethod-39-10.01 Google Scholar
Appleby, AP, Olson, PD, Colbert, DR (1976) Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron J 68:463–466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, DA, Ogg, AG Jr, Chevalier, PM (1997) The influence of seeding rate on weed control in small-red lentil (Lens culinaris). Weed Sci 45:296–300 Google Scholar
Balyan, RS, Malik, RK, Panwar, RS, Singh, S (1991) Competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars with wild oat (Avena ludoviciana). Weed Sci 39:154–158 Google Scholar
Baraibar, B, Hunter, MC, Schipanski, ME, Hamilton, A, Mortensen, DA (2018) Weed suppression in cover crop monocultures and mixtures. Weed Sci 66:121–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, DL, Thill, DC, Shafii, B (1992) Integrated wild oat (Avena fatua) management affects spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) yield and economics. Weed Technol 6:129–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, AR, Nalewaja, JD (1968) Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci 16:505–508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boerboom, CM, Young, FL (1995) Effect of postplant tillage and crop density on broadleaf weed control in dry pea (Pisum sativum) and lentil (Lens culinaris). Weed Technol 9:99–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, HL, Hill, JE (1985) Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci 33:176–181 Google Scholar
Challaiah, RE, Burnside, OC, Wicks, GA, Johnson, VA (1986) Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci 34:689–693 Google Scholar
Champion, GT, Froud-Williams, RJ, Holland, JM (1998) Interactions between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, row spacing and density and the effect on weed suppression and crop yield. Ann Appl Biol 133:443–453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, RJ, Froud-Williams, RJ (1984) A second survey of cereal weeds in central southern England. Weed Res 24:29–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, RJ, Peters, NCB (1976) Competition between wild oat in crops. Pages 99–112 in Jones, DP, ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. London: Agricultural Research Council Google Scholar
Cosser, ND, Gooding, MJ, Thompson, AJ, Froud-Williams, RJ (1997) Competitive ability and tolerance of organically grown wheat cultivars to natural weed infestations. Ann Appl Biol 130:523–535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, RD (1996) Comparative growth of wheat, barley, and annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in monoculture and mixed culture. Aust J Agric Res 47:449–464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decagon. 2003. AccuPAR Light Interception Crop and Timber Canopy Operator’s Manual. Version 1.1. Pullman, WA: Decagon Devices, Inc Google Scholar
Dew, DA (1972) An index of competition for estimating crop loss due to weeds. Can J Plant Sci 52:921–927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, AJ, Messersmith, CG, Nalewaja, JD, Duysen, ME (2000) Interference between spring cereals and Kochia scoparia related to environment and photosynthetic pathways. Agron J 92:173–181 Google Scholar
Fuentes, JP, Flury, M, Huggins, DR, Bezdicek, DF (2003) Soil water and nitrogen dynamics in dryland cropping systems of Washington State, USA. Soil Tillage Res 71:33–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrity, DP, Movillon, M, Moody, K (1992) Differential weed suppression ability in upland rice cultivars. Agron J 84:586–591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudet, CL, Keddy, PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242–243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I, Murray, BG, Loeppky, H (1993) Resistance to arloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci 4:232–238 Google Scholar
Holm, FA, Kirkland, KJ, Stevenson, FJ (2000) Defining optimum herbicide rates and timing for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in spring wheat. Weed Technol 14:167–175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hucl, P (1998) Response to weed control by four spring wheat genotypes differing in competitive ability. Can J Plant Sci 78:171–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huel, DG, Hucl, P (1996) Genotypic variation for competitive ability in spring wheat. Plant Breed 115:325–329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, PR, Aquino, RC (1968) Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22:529–542 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karimi, T, Stöckel, CO, Higgins, SS, Nelson, RL, Huggins, D (2017) Projected dryland cropping systems shifts in the Pacific Northwest in response to climate change. Front Ecol Evol. 10.3389/fevo.2017.00020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, KK, Shelton, GB, DeMacon, VL, Burns, JW, Carter, BP, Chen, XM, Morris, CF, Bosque Pérez, NA (2006) Registration of ‘Louise’ wheat. Crop Sci 46:1384–1386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, KK, Shelton, GB, DeMacon, VL, Chen, XM, Kuehner, JS, Baik, B, Engle, DA, Carter, AH, Bosque Pérez, NA (2009) Registration of ‘Kelse’ wheat. J Plant Reg 3:269–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, KJ (1993) Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) competition. Weed Technol 7:890–893 Google Scholar
Kirkland, KJ, O’Sullivan, PA (1984) Control of wild oat in wheat with barban, diclofop, methyl, flamprop methyl and difenzoquat. J Plant Sci 64:1019–1021 Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Froud-Williams, RJ (2002) Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora. Weed Res 42:417–428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, DB, Gill, GS, Murphy, CE, Walker, SR, Cousens, RD, Mokhtari, S, Peltzer, SJ, Coleman, R, Luckett, DJ (2001) Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Aust J Agric Res 52:527–548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, DB, Verbeek, B, Cousens, RD, Coombes, NE (1996) The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res 36:505–513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M, Dyck, E (1993) Weed management: a need to develop ecological approaches. Ecol Appl 3:39–41 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebman, M, Gallandt, ER (1997) Many little hammers: ecological approaches for management of crop–weed interactions. Pages 291–343 in Jackson, LE, ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego: Academic Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, H, Navabi, A, Frick, B, O’Donovan, J, Spaner, D (2007) Cultivar and seeding rate effects on the competitive ability of spring cereals grown under organic production in northern Canada. Agron J 99:1199–1207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, KE, Muehlbauer, FJ (2009) Registration of ‘Riveland’ lentil. J Plant Reg 3:5–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, CL (1996) Ecological bases for the cultural control of annual weeds. J Prod Agric 9:468–474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, DW, Thill, DC (1988) Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Sci 36:37–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehlbauer, FJ (1987) Registration of ‘Brewer’ and ‘Emerald’ lentil. Crop Sci 27:1088–1089 Google Scholar
O’Donovan, JT, Destremy, EA, O’Sullivan, PA, Dew, DA, Sharma, AK (1985) Influence of the relative-time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum Aestivum). Weed Sci 33:498–503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, JT, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Hall, LM (2000) Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate. Weed Technol 14:624–629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, JT, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Newman, JC, Robinson, D, Hall, LM (2001) Barley seeding rate influences the effects of variable herbicide rates on wild oat. Weed Sci 49:747–754 Google Scholar
O’Donovan, JT, Newman, JC, Harker, KN, Blackshaw, RE, McAndrew, DW (1999) Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference shoot biomass and seed yield under zero tillage. Can J Soil Sci 79:655–662 Google Scholar
Pavlychenko, TK, Harrington, JB (1934) Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can J For Res 10:77–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, BF, Wilson, BJ, Cartledge, O, Watkins, FB (1980) Effect of wheat seeding rate on wild oat competition. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 20:77–81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillinger, WF, Papendick, RI, Guy, SO, Rasmussen, PE, van Kessel, C (2006) Dryland cropping in the western United States. Pages 365–393 in Peterson, GA, Unger, PW, Payne, WA, eds. Dryland Agriculture. 2nd Ed. Agronomy Monograph No. 23. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Google Scholar
Scursoni, JA, Satorre, EH (2005) Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wild oat (Avena fatua) competition is affected by crop and weed density. Weed Technol 19:790–795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Ogg, AG Jr, Hou, Y (1999) Near-isogenic lines for Triticum aestivum height and crop competitiveness. Weed Sci 47:316–320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, RN, Xue, Q (2004) Spring wheat seed size and seeding rate effects on yield loss due to wild oat (Avena fatua) interference. Weed Sci 52:133–141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, RN, Xue, Q (2005) Quality versus quantity: spring wheat seed size and seeding rate effects on Avena fatua interference, economic returns and economic thresholds. Weed Res 45:351–360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Murphy, SD (1996) Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci 44:437–445 Google Scholar
Thill, DC, Lish, JM, Callihan, RM, Beckinski, EJ (1991) Integrated weed management—a component of integrated pest management: a critical review. Weed Technol 5:648–656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townley-Smith, L, Wright, AT (1994) Field pea cultivar and weed response to crop seed rate in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 74:387–393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, SE, Jitkov, VA, Muir, CE, Burns, JW, Reisenauer, PE, Line, RF, Chen, X, Jones, BL, Wesenberg, DM, Robertson, LD, Hayes, PM (2003) Registration of ‘Bob’ barley. Crop Sci 43:1131–1132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997) U.S. Standards: Subpart B—United States Standards for Barley. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 6 p Google Scholar
Wilson, B J, Peters, NCB (1982) Some studies of competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley I. The influence of A. fatua on yield of barley. Weed Res 22:143–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, HE (1953) The occurrence and the problem of wild oats in the Great Plains Region of North America. Weeds 2:292–294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, FL, Ogg, AG Jr, Papendick, RI, Thill, DC, Alldredge, JR (1994) Tillage and weed management affects winter wheat yield in an integrated pest management system. Agron J 86:147–154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, SL (2012) True integrated weed management. Weed Res 52:107–111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar