Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:49:13.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Analysis of Soybeans (Glycine max) in Competition with Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. S. Hagood Jr. ,
T. T. Bauman ,
J. L. Williams Jr.  and
M. M. Schreiber
E. S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Dep. Bot.
T. T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907 and Res. Agron., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric.
J. L. Williams Jr.
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Dep. Bot.
M. M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium L.) densities and planting dates on the growth and yield of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 71’]. Jimsonweed densities of 1.5 and 2 plants/m2 did not reduce the dry weight of soybean leaf, stem, root, or pod and seed tissues, leaf area index, plant height, pod number, or seed yield when soybeans and jimsonweed were planted at the same time. Weed densities ranging from 3 to 16 plants/m2 did reduce one or more of these soybean growth parameters. A significant density-by-year interaction was observed in which soybean growth reductions caused by high jimsonweed densities were less when competition for water was minimized by above-average precipitation in 1 of the 2 yr. No density of jimsonweed that emerged when soybeans were at the fourth trifoliolate-leaf stage reduced crop growth or yield.

Keywords

Weed densityweed emergence dateinterference
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 500 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
2. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Sci. 28:729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Majors, D. J., Johnson, D. R., and Leudders, V. D. 1975. Evaluation of eleven thermal unit methods for predicting soybean development. Crop Sci. 15:172–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds. 12:126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.Google Scholar
10. Orwick, P. L. and Schreiber, M. M. 1979. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and robust foxtail (Setaria viridis var. robusta-alba or var. robusta-purpurea) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:665–674.Google Scholar
11. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.Google Scholar
13. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service. 1970. Agricultural Handbook No. 366. Selected weeds of the United States. Washington, DC. 462 pp.Google Scholar
14. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds. 14:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar