Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:44:54.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) Competition in Potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David A. Wall  and
George H. Friesen
David A. Wall
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 3001, Morden, MB, Canada R0G 1J0
George H. Friesen
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 3001, Morden, MB, Canada R0G 1J0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of green foxtail density and location on the yield of potato under dryland conditions. Total and marketable tuber yields were reduced by green foxtail densities of less than 75 plants m-2. Marketable yields were affected more by increasing green foxtail density than were total yields. Increasing weed density reduced both the number and size (tuber weight) of marketable tubers but not the specific gravity or the sucrose content of the tubers at harvest. Green foxtail growing between crop rows was as competitive with potato as plants growing within the row. The effect of weed competition on total and marketable tuber yields was more pronounced in drought years than years with normal precipitation.

Keywords

Green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. #3 SETVIpotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’Weed interferenceweed densityweed locationyieldrectangular hyperbola
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4-5 , September 1990 , pp. 396 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, A.R.W. 1981. Effect of seeding dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:212–217.Google Scholar
2. Brimhall, P. B., Chamberlain, E. W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competition of annual weeds and sugarbeet. Weeds 13:33–35.Google Scholar
3. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239–252.Google Scholar
4. O'Donovan, J. T. 1984. Influence of various densities of green foxtail on yield of barley. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. on Weeds (West. Can. Sect) 3:248–249.Google Scholar
5. O'Donovan, J. T. 1984. Influence of various densities of green foxtail on yield of canola. Res. Rep. Expert Comm. on Weeds (West. Can. Sect.) 3:250.Google Scholar
6. Friesen, G. H. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.Google Scholar
7. Nelson, D. C. and Thoreson, M. C. 1981. Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and weeds. Weed Sci. 29:672–677.Google Scholar
8. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1984. Manitoba weed surveys: Cereal and oilseed crops from 1978, 1979 and 1981. Agric. Can. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 84-1. 230 pp.Google Scholar
9. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1987. Weed survey of Saskatchewan cereal and oilseed crops, 1986. Agric. Can. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 87-1. 251 pp.Google Scholar
10. Sowokinos, J. R. 1978. Relationship of harvest sucrose content to processing maturity and storage life of potatoes. Am. Pot. J. 55:333–344.Google Scholar
11. Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 959 pp.Google Scholar
12. Wall, D. A. and Friesen, G. H. 1990. Effect of duration of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield. Weed Technol. 4:539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar