Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:24:23.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) Control in Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) Turf by Diclofop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lambert B. McCarty*
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Hortic., 1545 Fifield Hall, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0512

Abstract

Greenhouse and field experiments were performed to investigate diclofop rate and mowing height interactions on goosegrass control and ‘Tifgreen’ and ‘Tifdwarf’ bermudagrass tolerance. In greenhouse experiments, greatest goosegrass control was achieved with diclofop when plants were maintained at 1.3 cm. Increased diclofop rates were required to suppress goosegrass mowed higher than 1.3 cm or unmowed. Greater than 90% goosegrass control was achieved with the combination of 1.3-cm mowing height and 0.6 kg ai ha–1 of diclofop. In field experiments, a minimum of 2 weeks was necessary for complete herbicidal activity. Diclofop at 1.1 kg ha–1 provided >90% control of goosegrass mowed between 1.9 to 2.5 cm. The addition of nonionic surfactant (0.25% by vol) to diclofop did not influence control. The addition of metribuzin (0.1 kg ai ha–1) to diclofop resulted in initial increased control, but it was transient The addition of MSMA (2.2 kg ai ha–1) to diclofop reduced goosegrass control an average of 18% compared to diclofop treatments alone. Tifdwarf bermudagrass was more sensitive to diclofop compared to Tifgreen. Seven to 14 days were required for Tifdwarf to recover from initial injury. This injury, although significant, was acceptable for bermudagrass used for golf greens. Clipping weights following treatment were also less for Tifdwarf than Tifgreen.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1976. Response of monocotyledons to HOE 22870 and HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:266269.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, S. W. 1985. Effectiveness of herbicides for Eleusine indica control during Cynodon dactylon improvement in golf course fairways. Pages 705715 in Lemaire, F., ed. Proc. Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., 5th. Avignon, France.Google Scholar
3. Dernoden, P. H. 1990. Comparison of three herbicides for selective tall fescue control in Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. J. 82:278282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Engel, R. E. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1969. Turf weeds and their control. Pages 240287 in Hanson, A. A. and Juska, F. V., eds. Turfgrass Science. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
5. Gillespie, G. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1989. Influence of 2,4-D and MCPA formulations and oil on diclofop phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 37:380384.Google Scholar
6. Hansen, A. A. 1921. The use of chemical weed killers on golf courses. U.S. Golf Assoc. Bull. 1:128:131.Google Scholar
7. Jagschitz, J. A. 1975. Postemergence crabgrass and nutsedge control in turfgrass with herbicides. Proc. NEWSS 29:376381.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, B. J. 1975. Postemergence control of large crabgrass and goosegrass in turf. Weed Sci. 23:404409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Johnson, B. J. 1976. Turfgrass tolerance and weed control with methazole and metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:512517.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, B. J. 1980. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Sci. 28:378381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lewis, W. M. 1981. Metribuzin for preemergence and postemergence control of crabgrass and goosegrass in bermudagrass turf. Pages 383390 in Sheard, R. W., ed. Proc. Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., 4th. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
12. Mulder, C.E.G. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1979. Influence of moisture on soil-incorporated diclofop. Weed Sci. 27:8387.Google Scholar
13. Murdoch, C. L. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1982. Diclofop for goosegrass control in bermudagrass putting greens. HortScience 17:914915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ross, M. A. and Lemhi, C. A. 1985. Applied weed science. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
15. Sprague, H. B. and Evaul, E. E. 1930. Experiments with turfgrasses. N. J. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 497.Google Scholar
16. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles of Statistics: A Biomedical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
17. Turgeon, A. J. 1980. Turfgrass Management. Reston Publishing Co., Inc., Reston, VA. Pages 330335.Google Scholar
18. West, L. D., Dawson, J. H., and Appleby, A. P. 1980. Factors influencing barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:366371.Google Scholar
19. Wilson, A. D. 1921. Killing chickweed with arsenite of soda. U.S. Golf Assoc. Bull. 1:126128.Google Scholar
20. Yang, Y. S. and Bingham, S. W. 1984. Effects of metribuzin on net photosynthesis of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.). Weed Sci. 32:247250.Google Scholar