Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:40:18.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate Susceptibility in Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) is Influenced by Parental Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew R. Kniss ,
Stephen D. Miller ,
Philip H. Westra  and
Robert G. Wilson
Andrew R. Kniss*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Department 3354, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Department 3354, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071
Philip H. Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska, 4502 Avenue I, Scottsbluff, NE 6936
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were carried out at two sites in 2005 using common lambsquarters seed collected from long-term research plots near Scottsbluff, NE; Fort Collins, CO; and Torrington, WY, to determine the effect of herbicide selection pressure on glyphosate susceptibility. Parental herbicide exposure influenced the level of glyphosate susceptibility exhibited by a subsequent generation. Common lambsquarters selected from historical plots receiving continuous and exclusive use of glyphosate exhibited lower mortality in response to 420 g ae ha−1 glyphosate compared with selections from nonglyphosate treatment histories. Selections from rotating glyphosate treatment histories demonstrated an intermediate tolerance response. Differences in response were also influenced by environmental conditions.

Keywords

Glyphosatecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L., CHEALHerbicide tolerancecreeping resistance
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 572 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al Mouemar, A. and Gasquez, J. 1983. Environmental conditions and isozyme polymorphism in Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 23:141–149.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Weed seed population response to tillage and herbicide use in three irrigated crops. Weed Sci. 38:511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Larney, F. O., Lindwall, C. W., and Kozub, G. C. 1994. Crop rotation and tillage effects on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Weed Technol. 8:231–237.Google Scholar
Boerboom, C. M., Wyse, D. L., and Somers, D. A. 1990. Mechanism of glyphosate tolerance in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). Weed Sci. 38:463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Mester, T. C., and Kohler, K. A. 1996. The effect of maize residues and tillage on emergence of Setaria faberi, Abutilon theophrasti, Amaranthus retroflexus, and Chenopodium album . Weed Res. 36:153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D. L., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci. 44:314–322.Google Scholar
Cole, M. J. 1961. Interspecific relationships and intraspecific variation of Chenopodium album L. in Britain. Watsonia. 5:47–58.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20:277–281.Google Scholar
Dall'Armellina, A. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1989. Effect of watering frequency, drought, and glyphosate on growth of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 37:314–318.Google Scholar
Darmency, H. and Gasquez, J. 1990. Appearance and spread of triazine resistance in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technol. 4:173–177.Google Scholar
DeGennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984. Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:472–476.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S., Phillips, W. H. I., and Kalnay, P. 1997. Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:436–443.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. 1995. Catch 22—mutually exclusive strategies for delaying/preventing quantitatively vs. monogenically inherited resistances. Pages 330–345. in Ragsdale, N.N., Kearney, P.C., Plimmer, J.R. eds. Options 2000: Eighth International Congress of Pesticide Chemistry. Washington, DC American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 25:448–451.Google Scholar
King, S. R., Hagood, E. S., and Westwood, J. H. 2004. Differential response of a common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotype to glyphosate. Weed Sci Soc. Am. Abstr. 44:68. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Klevorn, T. B. and Wyse, D. L. 1984. Effect of soil temperature and moisture on glyphosate and photoassimilate distribution in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 32:402–407.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Mililiken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., and Wolfinger, R. D. 1996. Heterogeneous variance models. Pages 267–302. in. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2001. Weed management and crop rotations influence populations of several broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. 49:106–122.Google Scholar
Masiunas, J. B. and Weller, S. C. 1988. Glyphosate activity in potato (Solanum tuberosum) under different temperature regimes and light levels. Weed Sci. 36:137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D., Stahlman, P. W., Westra, P., Wicks, G. A., Wilson, R. G., and Tichota, J. M. 2003. Risks of weed spectrum shifts and herbicide resistance in glyphosate-resistant cropping systems. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 56:61–62.Google Scholar
Neve, P. and Powles, S. 2005. Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum . Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:1154–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, M. D. K. and Zelaya, I. A. 2005. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:301–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, K. N. 2000. Factors affecting toxicity, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate in redvine (Brunnichia ovata). Weed Technol. 14:457–462.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195–200.Google Scholar
Scursoni, J., Forcella, F., Gunsolus, J., Owen, M., Oliver, R., Smeda, R., and Virdine, R. 2006. Weed diversity and soybean yield with glyphosate management along a north–south transect in the United States. Weed Sci. 54:713–719.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 2000. The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:320–326.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol. 7:286–297.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 2002. Risks of weed spectrum shifts and herbicide resistance in glyphosate tolerant cropping systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci Soc. 57:174.Google Scholar