Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:15:05.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate interaction with manganese in tank mixtures and its effect on glyphosate absorption and translocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark L. Bernards ,
Kurt D. Thelen ,
Donald Penner ,
Rajendra B. Muthukumaran  and
John L. McCracken
Kurt D. Thelen
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Rajendra B. Muthukumaran
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
John L. McCracken
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent reports indicate that manganese (Mn), applied as a foliar fertilizer in tank mixtures with glyphosate, has the potential to antagonize glyphosate efficacy and reduce weed control. It was hypothesized that Mn2+ complexed with glyphosate in a similar manner to Ca2+, forming salts that were not readily absorbed and, thereby, reducing glyphosate efficacy. This study was conducted to confirm the interaction of Mn2+ and glyphosate and to measure the effect of Mn on glyphosate absorption and translocation in velvetleaf. In aqueous solutions, Mn2+ binds with solvent molecules and with chelating agents to form hexacoordinate complexes. The distribution of paramagnetic species, both the free manganous ion ([Mn{H2O}6]2+) and the Mn2+–glyphosate complex, in Mn–glyphosate solutions at various pH values were analyzed using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Glyphosate interaction with Mn appeared to increase as the pH was increased from spray solution levels (2.8 to 4.5) to levels common in the plant symplast (7.5). Growth chamber bioassays were conducted to measure absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled glyphosate in solution with four Mn fertilizers: Mn-ethylaminoacetate (Mn-EAA), Mn-ethylenediaminetetraacetate (Mn-EDTA), Mn-lignin sulfonate (Mn-LS), and Mn-sulfate (MnSO4). Mn-EDTA did not interfere with glyphosate efficacy, absorption, or translocation. However, both MnSO4 and Mn-LS reduced glyphosate efficacy, absorption, and translocation. Mn-EAA severely antagonized glyphosate efficacy, and although glyphosate in tank mixtures with Mn-EAA was absorbed rapidly, little was translocated from the treated leaf. The Mn-EAA fertilizer contained approximately 0.5% iron (Fe) not reported on the fertilizer label. Iron is presumed to be partially responsible for the very limited translocation of glyphosate from the treated leaf in Mn-EAA tank mixtures. Adding ammonium sulfate increased the efficacy, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate for each Mn fertilizer tank mixture.

Keywords

Glyphosatevelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus. ABUTHGlyphosate–metal complexhard water antagonismsoybean
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 6 , December 2005 , pp. 787 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Atkins, P. and de Paula, J. 2002. Physical Chemistry, 7th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Poston, D. H., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Glyphosate interactions with manganese. Weed Technol 16:792–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, M. L., Thelen, K. D., and Penner, D. 2005. Glyphosate efficacy is antagonized by manganese. Weed Technol 19:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromilow, R. H., Chamberlain, K., Tench, A. J., and Williams, R. H. 1993. Phloem translocation of strong acids—glyphosate, substituted phosphonic, and sulfonic acids—in Ricinus communis L. Pestic. Sci 37:39–47.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983a. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci 31:124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983b. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci 31:163–169.Google Scholar
Camberato, J. J. 2001. Manganese Deficiency and Fertilization of Soybeans. http://www.clemson.edu/edisto/soybean/manganese.pdf.Google Scholar
Cohn, M. and Townsend, J. 1954. A study of manganous complexes by paramagnetic resonance absorption. Nature 173:1090–1091.Google Scholar
Glass, R. L. 1984. Metal complex formation by glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem 32:1249–1253.Google Scholar
Hall, G. J., Hart, C. A., and Jones, C. A. 2000. Plants as sources of cations antagonistic to glyphosate activity. Pest Manag. Sci 56:351–358.Google Scholar
Hetherington, P. R., Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Warner, J. M. 1998. Absorption and efflux of glyphosate by cell suspensions. J. Exp. Bot 49:527–533.Google Scholar
Lundager Madsen, H. E., Christensen, H. H., and Gottlieb-Petersen, C. G. 1978. Stability constants of copper(II), zinc, manganese(II), calcium, and magnesium complexes of N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine (glyphosate). Acta Chem. Scand A32:79–83.Google Scholar
Martell, A. E. and Smith, R. A. 1974. Critical Stability Constants. Volume 1. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
McBride, M. 1991. Electron spin resonance study of copper ion complexation by glyphosate and related ligands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 55:979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, M. and Kung, K-H. 1989. Complexation of glyphosate and related ligands with iron(III). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 53:1668–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motekaitis, R. J. and Martell, A. E. 1985. Metal chelate formation by N-phosphonomethylglycine and related ligands. J. Coord. Chem 14:139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci 39:622–628.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1992. Species differ in response to adjuvants with glyphosate. Weed Technol 6:561–566.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Freeman, T. P. 1992. Spray droplet residual of glyphosate in various carriers. Weed Sci 40:576–589.Google Scholar
Nilsson, G. 1985. Interactions between glyphosate and metals essential for plant growth. Pages 35–47 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D. eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ottaviani, M. F., Montalti, F., Romanelli, M., Turro, N. J., and Tomalia, D. A. 1996. Characterization of starburst dendrimers by EPR: 4. Mn(II) as a probe of interphase. J. Phys. Chem 100:11033–11042.Google Scholar
Reed, G. H. and Cohn, M. 1970. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of manganese(II)-protein complexes. J. Biol. Chem 245:662–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, G. H. and Markham, G. D. 1984. EPR of Mn(II) complexes with enzymes and other proteins. Biol. Magn. Reson 6:73–142.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2001. The SAS System. Version 8.2. Cary, NC: The Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Shea, P. J. and Tupy, D. R. 1984. Reversal of cation-induced reduction in glyphosate activity with EDTA. Weed Sci 32:803–806.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci 23:235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlman, P. L. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Effects of water quality and spray volume on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci 27:38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramaniam, V. and Hoggard, P. E. 1988. Metal complexes of glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem 36:1326–1329.Google Scholar
Sundaram, A. and Sundaram, K. M. S. 1997. Solubility products of six metal-glyphosate complexes in water and forestry soils, and their influence on glyphosate toxicity to plants. J. Environ. Sci. Health B32:583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, M. 1978. Chemical and Biochemical Aspects of Electron-Spin Resonance Spectroscopy. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995a. The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci 43:541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995b. Utility of nuclear magnetic resonance for determining the molecular influence of citric acid and an organosilicone adjuvant on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci 43:566–571.Google Scholar
Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., Beaton, J. D., and Havlin, J. L. 1993. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan. Pp. 332–333.Google Scholar
Vitosh, M. L., Warncke, D. D., and Lucas, R. E. 1998. Secondary and micronutrients for vegetables and field crops. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension Bull. E-486.Google Scholar
Weast, R. C. ed. 1976. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 57th ed. Cleveland, OH: CRC.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1985. Effect of inorganic salts on the toxicity and translocation of glyphosate and MSMA in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci 33:755–761.Google Scholar