Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:00:23.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glyphosate- and Acetolactate Synthase Inhibitor–Resistant Kochia (Kochia scoparia) in Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
Robert E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
AAFC, Lethbridge Research Centre, P.O. Box 3000, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
Ryan Low
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 410 AgForestry Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 410 AgForestry Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
Connie A. Sauder
Affiliation:
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
Sara Martin
Affiliation:
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
Randall N. Brandt
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research Centre, P.O. Box 3000, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
Scott W. Shirriff
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In summer, 2011, we investigated suspected glyphosate-resistant (GR) kochia in three chem-fallow fields (designated F1, F2, F3, each farmed by a different grower) in southern Alberta. This study characterizes glyphosate resistance in those populations, based on data from dose–response experiments. In a greenhouse experiment, the three populations exhibited a resistance factor ranging from 4 to 6 based on shoot biomass response (GR50 ratios), or 5 to 7 based on survival response (LD50 ratios). Similar results were found in a field dose–response experiment at Lethbridge, AB, in spring 2012 using the F2 kochia population. In fall 2011, we surveyed 46 fields within a 20-km radius of the three chem-fallow fields for GR kochia. In the greenhouse, populations were screened with glyphosate at 900 g ae ha−1. Seven populations were confirmed as GR, the farthest site located about 13 km from the three originally confirmed populations. An additional GR population more than 100 km away was later confirmed. Populations were screened for acetolactate synthase (ALS)–inhibitor (thifensulfuron : tribenuron) and dicamba resistance in the greenhouse, with molecular characterization of ALS-inhibitor resistance in the F1, F2, and F3 populations. All GR populations were resistant to the ALS-inhibiting herbicide, but susceptible to dicamba. ALS-inhibitor resistance in kochia was conferred by Pro197, Asp376, or Trp574 amino acid substitutions. Based upon a simple empirical model with a parameter for selection pressure, calculated from weed relative abundance and glyphosate efficacy, and a parameter for seedbank longevity, kochia, wild oat, and green foxtail were the top three weeds, respectively, predicted at risk of selection for glyphosate resistance in the semiarid Grassland region of the Canadian prairies; wild oat, green foxtail, and cleavers species were predicted at greatest risk in the subhumid Parkland region. This study confirms the first occurrence of a GR weed in western Canada. Future research on GR kochia will include monitoring, biology and ecology, fitness, mechanism of resistance, and best management practices.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2003. A National Ecological Framework for Canada: GIS Data. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/gis_data.html. Accessed: May 2012.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2010. Predicting Prairie Weeds at Risk for Glyphosate Resistance. Page 9 in Canadian Weed Science Society Annual Meeting Archives. http://www.weedscience.ca/annual-meeting/archives. Accessed: May 2012. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2012. Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest. Manag. Sci. 67: 10371048.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Harker, K. N., Hall, L. M., Holm, F. A., and Gulden, R. H. 2011a. Risk assessment of glyphosate resistance in western Canada. Weed Technol. 25: 159164.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2009. Alberta Weed Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in 2007. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 09-1. 36.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. and Tardif, F. J. 2012. Herbicide cross resistance in weeds. Crop Prot. 35: 1528.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., Sauder, C. A., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2011b. Occurrence and molecular characterization of acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Technol. 25: 170175.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Weiss, R. M., Leeson, J. Y., and Olfert, O. O. 2012. Range expansion of kochia (Kochia scoparia) in North America under a changing climate. Pages 3346 in Ivany, J. A., and Blackshaw, R. E., eds. Climate Change and the Canadian Agricultural Environment. Topics in Canadian Weed Science. Volume 8. Pinawa, MB: Canadian Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Bullied, W. J., Marginet, A. M., and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. Conventional- and conservation-tillage systems influence emergence periodicity of annual weed species in canola. Weed Sci. 51: 886897.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Vigue, G., Stroller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Tranel, P. J. 1999. A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 47: 2027.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1985. Spread of kochia in the northwestern United States. Weeds Today 16: 46.Google Scholar
Friesen, L. F., Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., and Van Acker, R. C. 2009. The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can. J. Plant Sci. 89: 141167.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. 680 p.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. Pages 325347 in LeBaron, H. M., and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants—Biology and Biochemistry. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Hoffman, D. L. 1992. DNA sequence variation in domain A of the acetolactate synthase genes of herbicide-resistant and -susceptible weed biotypes. Weed Sci. 40: 670676.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., and Thill, D. C. 1995. Diverse mutations in the acetolactate synthase gene confer chlorsulfuron resistance in kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotypes. Weed Sci. 43: 175178.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2012. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: April 2012.Google Scholar
Koutsoyiannis, A. 1977. Theory of Econometrics. 2nd ed. London: MacMillan Education. Pp. 8191.Google Scholar
Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R 2 . Am. Statistician 39: 279285.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie Weed Surveys of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 05-1. 395 p.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Devine, M. D. 1994. Herbicide resistance in the Canadian prairie provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75 (Suppl.):516.Google Scholar
Preston, C., Wakelin, A. M., Dolman, F. C., Bostamam, Y., and Boutsalis, P. 2009. A decade of glyphosate-resistant Lolium around the world: mechanisms, genes, fitness and agronomic management. Weed Sci. 57: 435441.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 169172.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Primiani, M. M. 1990. Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol. 93: 5561.Google Scholar
Salava, J., Chodová, D., and Mikulka, J. 2004. Molecular basis of acetolactate synthase-inhibitor resistance in Czech biotypes of kochia. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 19: 915919.Google Scholar
SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 1243 p.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 2012. Guide to Crop Protection: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 482 p. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Guide_to_Crop_Protection. Accessed: April 2012.Google Scholar
Sathasivan, K., Haughn, G. W., and Murai, N. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of a mutant acetolactate synthase gene from imidazolinone resistant Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 2188.Google Scholar
Schwinghamer, T. D. and Van Acker, R. C. 2008. Emergence timing and persistence of kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 56: 3741.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9: 218227.Google Scholar
Sikkema, P. H., Robinson, D. E., Tardif, F. J., Lawton, M. B., and Soltani, N. 2013. Discovery of glyphosate-resistant weeds in Ontario, Canada—distribution plus control. Global Herbicide Resistance Challenge Conference, Perth, Australia. In press [Abstract].Google Scholar
Stallings, G. P., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafi, B. 1995. Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 43: 95102.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2012. July estimates of production of principal field crops. Field Crop Reporting Series. Catalogue no. 22-002-X. http://www.statscan.gc.ca. Accessed: November 2012.Google Scholar
Steel, G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. and Leeson, J. Y. 2007. Tracking long-term changes in the arable weed flora of Canada. Pages 4369 in Clements, D. R., and Darbyshire, S. J., eds. Invasive Plants: Inventories, Strategies and Action. Topics in Canadian Weed Sci. Volume 5. Sainte Anne de Bellevue, QC: Canadian Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1994. Characterization of chlorosulfuron resistant and susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol. 8: 470476.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C. 2009. Weed biology serves practical weed management. Weed Res. 49: 15.Google Scholar
Vink, J. P., Soltani, N., Robinson, D. E., Tardif, F. J., Lawton, M. B., and Sikkema, P. H. 2012. Occurrence and distribution of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in southwestern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 533539.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I., Sauder, C. A., and Beckie, H. J. 2010. Acetolactate synthase (ALS) target-site mutations in ALS inhibitor-resistant Russian thistle (Salsola tragus). Weed Sci. 58: 244251.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I., Xu, R., Sauder, C., and Beckie, H. J. 2008. Acetolactate synthase target-site mutations and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in ALS-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 56: 797806.Google Scholar