Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:20:44.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Physalis angulata), Smooth Groundcherry (Physalis virginiana), and Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Craig E. Thomson  and
William W. Witt
Craig E. Thomson
Affiliation:
Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
William W. Witt
Affiliation:
Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Factors that govern the germination of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata L. # PHYAN), smooth groundcherry [Physalis virginiana var. subglabrata (Mackenz. and Bush) Waterfall # PHYSU], and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun. # SOLPT) were evaluated. Maximum germination of all three species occurred at a constant 30 C or alternating temperature regimes that included 30 C. Seed of all species germinated in light and dark, but germination was reduced in the dark. Germination and seedling vigor of all species decreased as substrate pH decreased. Cutleaf groundcherry seed were slightly less sensitive than seed of other species to simulated moisture stress. All species produced 90% or more viable seed by 8 weeks after anthesis.

Keywords

Seedling vigorpHosmotic potentialPHYANPHYSUSOLPT
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 58 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, V. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Germination, control and competition of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:133–138.Google Scholar
2. Boyd, J. W. and Murray, D. S. 1982. Growth and development of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium). Weed Sci. 30:238–243.Google Scholar
3. Burgert, K. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Optimum temperature for germination and seedling development of black nightshade. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Page 56.Google Scholar
4. Hoveland, C. S. and Buchanan, G. A. 1973. Weed seed germination under simulated drought. Weed Sci. 21:133–138.Google Scholar
5. Maguire, J. D. 1962. Speed of germination – aid in selection and evaluation. Crop Sci. 2:176–177.Google Scholar
6. Michel, B. E. and Kaufman, M. R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol. 51:914–916.Google Scholar
7. Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.Google Scholar
8. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529–533.Google Scholar
9. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32:638–645.Google Scholar
10. Roberts, H. A. and Lockett, P. M. 1978. Seed dormancy and field emergence in Solanum nigrum L. Weed Res. 18:231–241.Google Scholar
11. Steinhauer, G. P., Grigsby, B., Correa, L., and Frank, P. 1955. A study of methods for obtaining laboratory germination of certain weed seeds. Assoc. Off. Seed Anal. Proc. 45:48–52.Google Scholar