Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:08:03.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination Ecology of Biennial Wormwood (Artemisia biennis) and Lanceleaf Sage (Salvia reflexa) Seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George O. Kegode ,
Gauri Nazre  and
Michael J. Christoffers
George O. Kegode*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO 64468
Gauri Nazre
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102
Michael J. Christoffers
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage have become serious weeds of several crops within the northern Great Plains of the United States and Canada. Both species are prolific seed producers but little is known about their potential for developing persistent seedbanks. Field studies were conducted to determine the influence of duration (7, 8, 11, 19, 20, and 23 mo) and depth of burial (0, 2.5, and 10 cm) on biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage seed viability and decay. Biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage seeds were buried in September 2003 (burial 1) and September 2004 (burial 2). In burial 1, biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage seed viability was 65 and 66%, respectively, after 23 mo of burial. In burial 2, biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage seed viability was 8 and 3%, respectively, after 23 mo of burial. The difference was likely because of higher soil moisture during burial 2, which promoted seed decay. Controlled-environment studies sought to determine the influence of stratification environments (freezing, chilling, and freeze–thaw) followed by exposure to diurnally fluctuating temperatures on germination of biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage seeds. Stratified biennial wormwood seed germination was 95% or greater when incubated in fluctuating day/night temperatures of 37/20 or 37/25 C. Stratified lanceleaf sage seeds from freezing and chilling environments did not differ in germination following incubation in fluctuating temperatures and averaged 56 and 55%, respectively. Germination of stratified lanceleaf sage seeds from the freezing and thawing environment was higher than 50% during the thawing cycle, suggesting the possibility of early season emergence of this species. Our study indicates that biennial wormwood and lanceleaf sage have the potential to develop a seedbank that can persist for more than 2 yr. High moisture levels in the soil seedbank can lead to reduced seed survival.

Keywords

Biennial wormwood, Artemisia biennis Willd. ARTBIlanceleaf sage, Salvia reflexa Hornem. SALRE.Seed burialseedbankseed fatestratificationsoil temperature
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Cropping history, tillage, and herbicide effects on weed flora composition in irrigated corn. Agron. J. 85:817–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1971. Salvia reflexa new to Tennessee. Castanea. 36:77–79.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1979. The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:351–371.Google Scholar
Bewley, J. D. and Black, M. 1994. Seeds—Physiology of Development and Germination. 2nd ed. New York Plenum. 199–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. S., Cardina, J., Forcella, F., Johnson, G. A., Kegode, G., Lindquist, J. L., Luschei, E. C., Renner, K. A., Spargue, C. L., and Williams, M. M. II. 2005. Environmental factors affecting seed persistence of annual weeds across the U.S. corn belt. Weed Sci. 53:860–868.Google Scholar
Davis, V. M., Gibson, K. D., and Bauman, T. T. 2009. Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) population dynamics and crop yield-years III and IV. Weed Sci. 57:417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, A. G., Nalewaja, J. D., Rasmusson, D. D., and Buchli, J. 1981. Survey of wild oats and other weeds of North Dakota, 1978 and 1979. Fargo, ND North Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station Research Rep. No. 79.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Duke, S. O. 1985. Physiology of weed seed dormancy and germination. Pages 28–64. in Duke, S. O. Weed Physiology, Vol. I, Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. New York Chapman and Hall. 72–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seed banks of the U.S. Corn Belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40:636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freebairn, R. D. and Strang, J. 1974. Mintweed in perspective. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 85:26–28.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. M. 1966. Fungi attacking seeds in dry seed-beds. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 91:84–89.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. M. 1972. Ecology of Soil Fungi. London Chapman and Hall. 173.Google Scholar
Hall, H. M. and Clements, F. E. 1923. The Phylogenetic Method in Taxonomy. The North American Species of Artemisia, Chrysothanamus, and Atriplex. Washington, DC Carnegie Institution of Washington. 355.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Davis, V. M., Kruger, G. R., and Weller, S. C. 2009. Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations. Eur. J. Agron. 31:162–172.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Hartzler, R. G., and Nordby, D. E. 2004. Weeds to watch: weeds that seem to be expanding their habitat range. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 59:133.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O. and Christoffers, M. J. 2003. Biennial wormwood (Artemisia biennis Willd.). Weed Technol. 17:646–649.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O., Christoffers, M. J., Mengistu, L. W., and Thomas, A. G. 2004. Genetic diversity and late germination may contribute to biennial wormwood weediness. Pages 57. in. Proceedings of the 4th International Weed Science Congress. Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O. and Ciernia, M. G. 2003. Weed seedling emergence patterns in North Dakota row crops. Abstr. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 58:70.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O. and Pearce, R. B. 1998. Influence of environment during maternal plant growth on dormancy of shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seed. Weed Sci. 46:322–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakela, O. 1965. A Flora of Northeastern Minnesota. St. Paul, MN North Central. 388–390.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie Weed Surveys of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre Weed Survey Ser. Pub. 05-1. 395.Google Scholar
Mahoney, K. J. and Kegode, G. O. 2004. Biennial wormwood (Artemisia biennis) biomass allocation and seed production. Weed Sci. 52:246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengistu, L. W., Christoffers, M. J., and Kegode, G. O. 2004. Genetic diversity of biennial wormwood. Weed Sci. 52:53–60.Google Scholar
Nazre, G. 2006. Biology and Ecology of Biennial Wormwood (Artemisia biennis Willd.) and Lanceleaf Sage (Salvia reflexa Hornem.) Seed. . Fargo, ND North Dakota State University. 49.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. A. and Kegode, G. O. 2005. Biennial wormwood (Artemisia biennis) competition with soybean (Glycine max). Phytoprotection. 86:125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Roach, D. A. and Wulff, R. D. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:209–235.Google Scholar
Schutte, B. J., Davis, A. S., Renner, K. A., and Cardina, J. 2008. Maternal and burial environment effects on seed mortality of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). Weed Sci. 56:834–840.Google Scholar
Small, J. K. 1903. Flora of the Southeastern United States. New York Small. 1298–1299.Google Scholar
Stevens, O. A. 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am. J. Bot. 19:784–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbendieck, J., Friisoe, G. Y., and Bolick, M. R. 1995. Lanceleaf sage (Salvia reflexa Hornem.). Weeds of Nebraska and the Great Plains. 2nd ed. Lincoln, NE Nebraska Department of Agriculture. 589.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1972. Interactions of light and a temperature shift on seed germination. Plant Physiol. 49:127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1983. A comparative study of germination responses to diurnally-fluctuating temperatures. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K., Grime, J. P., and Mason, G. 1977. Seed germination in response to diurnal fluctuations in temperature. Nature (London) 267:147–148.Google Scholar
Van Mourik, T. A., Stomph, T. J., and Murdoch, A. J. 2005. Why high seed densities within buried mesh bags may overestimate depletion rates of soil seed banks. J. Appl. Ecol. 42:299–305.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. and Mitschunas, B. 2008. Fungal effects on seed bank persistence and potential applications in weed biocontrol: a review. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9:191–203.Google Scholar
Weerakoon, W. L. and Lovett, J. V. 1986. Studies of Salvia reflexa Hornem. III. Factors controlling germination. Weed Res. 26:269–276.Google Scholar
Zollinger, R. K., Reis, J. L., and Hammond, J. J. 2003. Survey of Weeds in North Dakota—2000. Fargo, ND North Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station Research Rep. ER-83. 97.Google Scholar