Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:18:34.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination Characteristics of Three Species of Cruciferae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Young ,
Raymond A. Evans ,
Richard O. Gifford  and
Richard E. Eckert Jr.
James A. Young
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr.
Raymond A. Evans
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr.
Richard O. Gifford
Affiliation:
Plant, Soil, and Water Science, University of Nevada, Reno
Richard E. Eckert Jr.
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Germination of tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimum L.), tansy mustard (Descurainia pinnata (Walt.) Britton), and yellowflower pepperweed (Lepidium perfoliatum L.) is partially dependent on total degree hours of incubation (temperature above 0 C times the duration of incubation). This relation was similar under constant or alternating temperatures. Alternating temperature regimes with −20 C inhibited germination, and greatly depressed subsequent germination at optimum temperatures. Tansy mustard and yellowflower pepperweed have temperature-dependent after-ripening requirements. Germination of all three species responded similarly to osmotic stress. The relation between tumble mustard germination under osmotic or soil moisture stress is dependent on the texture of the soil substrate. A mucilaginous coating greatly aids the germination of yellowflower pepperweed seeds on the surface of media under low (0.05 to 0.2 bars) moisture tension. Germination of seeds of the three species recovered in soil samples from the field is radically different from that of freshly harvested material. The seeds acquire a dormancy which is broken irregularly under ideal conditions for germination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1970 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anon. 1941. Yearbook of Agriculture. U. S. Dep. of Agr. U. S. Gov't Printing Office. Wash., D. C. 1247 p.Google Scholar
2. Anon. 1960. Soil classification—A comprehensive system. 7th Approximation. U. S. Dep. of Agr. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff, U. S. Gov't Printing Office. Wash., D. C. 265 p.Google Scholar
3. Brenchley, W. E. and Warrington, K. 1930. The weed seed population of arable soil. I. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. J. Ecol. 18:235–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brenchley, W. E. and Warrington, K. 1933. The weed seed population of arable soil. II. Influence of crop, soil, and methods of cultivation upon the relative abundance of viable seeds. J. Ecol. 21:103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brenchley, W. E. and Warrington, K. 1936. The weed seed population of arable soil. III. The re-establishment of weed species after reduction by fallowing. J. Ecol. 24:479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Collis-George, N. and Sands, J. E. 1959. The control of seed germination by moisture as a soil physical property. Australian J. Agr. Res. 10:628–636.Google Scholar
7. Davis, W. E. 1930. Primary dormancy, after-ripening and development of secondary dormancy in embryos of Ambrosia trifida . J. Bot. 17:58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Eckert, R. E. Jr. and Evans, R. A. 1967. A chemical-fallow technique for control of downy brome and establishment of perennial grasses on rangelands. J. Range Manage. 20:35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ellern, J. S. and Tadmor, N. H. 1966. Germination of range plant seeds at fixed temperatures. J. Range Manage. 19: 341–345.Google Scholar
10. Ellern, J. S. and Tadmor, N. H. 1967. Germination of range plant seeds at alternating temperatures. J. Range Manage. 20:72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Evans, R. A., Holbo, H. R., Eckert, R. E. Jr., and Young, J. A. 1970. Functional environment of downy brome communities in relation to weed control and revegetation. Weed Sci. 18:154–162.Google Scholar
12. Evans, R. A., Eckert, R. E. Jr., and Kay, B. L. 1967. Wheatgrass establishment with paraquat and tillage on downy brome ranges. Weeds 15:50–55.Google Scholar
13. Evenari, M. 1949. Germination inhibitors. Bot. Rev. 15:153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Harper, J. L. and Benton, R. A. 1966. The behavior of seeds in soil. II. The germination of seeds on the surface of a water supplying substrate. J. Ecol. 54:151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Harper, J. L., Williams, J. T., and Sagar, G. R. 1965. The behavior of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants. J. Ecol. 539:273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Piemeisel, R. L. 1945. Natural replacement of weed host of the beet leafhopper as affected by rodents. U. S. Dep. of Agr. Cir. 739. 48 p.Google Scholar
17. Salisbury, E. J. 1942. The Reproductive Capacity of Plants. Bells, London. 244 p.Google Scholar
18. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of medusahead in response to temperature and after-ripening. Weed Sci. 16:92–95.Google Scholar
19. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., Gifford, R. O., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of medusahead in response to osmotic stress. Weed Sci. 16:364–368.Google Scholar
20. Young, J. A., Evans, R.A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1969. Population dynamics of downy brome. Weed Sci. 17:20–26.Google Scholar
21. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1969. Emergence of medusahead and other grasses from four seeding depths. Weed Sci. 17:376–379.Google Scholar