Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:41:47.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Interference on Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Growth and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Don W. Morishita  and
Donald C. Thill
Don W. Morishita
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1983 and 1984 to measure the interference of wild oat (Avena fatua L. # AVEFA) removed at various stages of development (two to three leaves, two to three tillers, two nodes, and heading), plus treatments with wild oat not removed, and wild oat-free stands on the growth and yield of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Advance’). The final plant density of barley and wild oat was 160 and 170 plants/m2, respectively. Based on aboveground barley biomass and yield, the critical duration of wild oat interference began about the two-node stage and continued until maturity of the barley. Wild oat interference reduced barley biomass, the number of tiller heads/plant, tiller heads/unit area, and tiller grain yield, but not the number or grain yield of the main-stem heads. Wild oat did not affect the soil matric potential or the barley total plant and soil nitrogen contents. However, wild oat did reduce total water and turgor potential in barley at the boot stage of growth, which may have affected tiller head formation.

Keywords

Competitioncritical durationAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akey, W. C. and Morrison, I. N. 1984. Effects of soil moisture on the vegetative growth of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 32:625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oats in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
3. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349–359.Google Scholar
4. Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total nitrogen. Pages 1149–1178 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agron. No. 9. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
5. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: Plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.Google Scholar
6. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1986. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: Effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Catzione, P. and Toderi, G. 1974. The effects on wheat of competition from wild oats (Avena ludoviciana Dur.) taking into account increasing rates of infestation and other agronomic factors. Riv. Agron. 8:116–123.Google Scholar
8. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.Google Scholar
9. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1976. Competition between wild oats and crops. Pages 99–112 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild oats in world agriculture. Agric. Res. Counc. London.Google Scholar
10. Cussans, G. W. and Wilson, B. J. 1975. Some effects of crop row width and seedrate on competition between spring barley and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) or common couch [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. Status and Control of Grass Weeds in Europe. Pages 77–86.Google Scholar
11. Dew, D. A. 1972. An index of competition for estimating crop loss due to weeds Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:921–927.Google Scholar
12. Fay, P. K. and Duke, W. B. 1977. An assessment of the allelopathic potential in Avena germplasm. Weed Sci. 25:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. de Gournay, X. 1964. Data pertaining to wild oat control in spring barley. Ann. Epiphyt. 15:285–320.Google Scholar
14. Hamman, W. M. 1979. Field confirmation of an index for predicting yield loss of wheat and barley due to wild oat competition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:243–244.Google Scholar
15. Hoepfner, K. G. 1969. Adverse effects on the yield of spring barley by wild oats (Avena fatua L.) Nachrichtenbl. D. Tsch. Pflanzenschutzdienst (Berl.) 23:139–140.Google Scholar
16. McBeath, D. K., Dew, D. A., and Friesen, H. A. 1970. Competition between barley and wild oats as affected by nitrogen, barban and time of seeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50:541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McNamara, D. W. 1976. Wild oat density and the duration of wild oat competition as it influences wheat growth and yield. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16:402–406.Google Scholar
18. Nieto, J. H., Brondo, M. A., and Gonzales, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. Pans(c). 14:159–166.Google Scholar
19. O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.Google Scholar
20. Peters, N. C. B. 1984. Time of onset of competition and effects of various fractions of an Avena fatua L. population on spring barley. Weed Res. 24:305–315.Google Scholar
21. Pfeiffer, R. K. and Holmes, H. M. 1961. A study of the competition between barley and oats as influenced by barley seedrate, nitrogen level and barban treatment. Weed Res. 1:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Saghir, A. R., Kahn, A. R., and Worzella, W. W. 1968. Effects of plant parts on the grain yield, kernel weight, and plant height of wheat and barley. Agron. J. 60:95–97.Google Scholar
23. Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Bradstreet, E. D., and Hemmingsen, E. A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sci. 148: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Schumacher, W. J., Thill, D. C., and Lee, G. A. 1983. Allelopathic potential of wild oat (Avena fatua) on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1235–1245.Google Scholar
25. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47: 716–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wilson, B. J. and Peters, N. C. B. 1982. Some studies of competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. I. The influence of A. fatua on yield of barley. Weed Res. 22:143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar