Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:10:16.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for Allelopathy by Residues and Aqueous Extracts of Rye (Secale cereale)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jane P. Barnes  and
Alan R. Putnam
Jane P. Barnes
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. and Pestic. Res. Ctr., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Alan R. Putnam
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. and Pestic. Res. Ctr., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under simulated no-till conditions in the greenhouse, rye (Secale cereale L. ‘Wheeler’) residues reduced emergence of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ‘Ithaca’) and proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L. # PANMI) by 58 and 35%, respectively, over that obtained with a wood shaving control mulch. Rye shoot tissue inhibited lettuce germination 52% more than root tissue. Petri dish bioassays of residue in soil confirmed phytotoxicity on cress (Lepidium sativum L. ‘Curly’), lettuce, barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv. # ECHCG), and proso millet. Radicle elongation was a more senstive measure of phytotoxicity than germination per se. Phytotoxicity increased as the distance from seeds to rye residues decreased. While rye shoot residues caused 40% greater inhibition of cress radicle elongation in sterile soil than nonsterile soil, barnyardgrass was equally inhibited in both soil regimes. Phytotoxicity decreased in nonsterile soil, indicating that the compounds were degraded by microorganisms. Phytotoxic compounds in shoots were water extractable. Cress and barnyardgrass responded similarly to both aqueous rye extracts and to residues added to soil.

Keywords

Germination and seedling growth bioassaysphytotoxicityEchinochloa crus-galliPanicum miliaceumLactuca sativaLepidium sativumPANMIECHCG
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 384 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1045–1057.Google Scholar
2. Benoit, R. E., Willits, N. A., and Hanna, W. J. 1962. Effect of rye winter cover crops on soil structure. Agron. J. 54:419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Blevins, R. L., Cook, D., Phillips, S. H., and Phillips, R. E. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593–596.Google Scholar
4. Borner, H. 1950. The role of toxic substances in the interactions of higher plants. Bot. Rev. 16:51–65.Google Scholar
5. Chou, C-H and Patrick, Z. A. 1976. Identification and phytotoxic activity of compounds produced during decomposition of corn and rye residues in soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 2:369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Colby, S. R. 1968. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds. 16:20.Google Scholar
7. Harlin, J. R. 1976. Diseases as a factor in plant evaluation. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 14:31–51.Google Scholar
8. Levin, D. A. 1971. Plant phenolics: An ecological perspective. The Nat. 105:157:181.Google Scholar
9. Osvald, H. 1953. On antagonism between plants. Proc. 7th Int. Bot. Congr., Stockholm (1950): 167–171.Google Scholar
10. Patrick, Z. A. 1971. Phytotoxic substances associated with the decomposition in soil of plant residues. Soil Sci. 111:13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Patrick, Z. A., Toussoun, T. A., and Snyder, W. C. 1963. Phytotoxic substances in arable soils associated with the decomposition of plant residues. Phytopathology. 53:152–161.Google Scholar
12. Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1983. Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Prot. 2:173–181.Google Scholar
13. Putnam, A. R., DeFrank, J., and Barnes, J. P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1001–1010.Google Scholar
14. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1978. Allelopathy in agroecosystems. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 16:431–451.Google Scholar
15. Rice, E. L. 1984. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York. 422 pp.Google Scholar
16. Rice, E. L. 1979. Allelopathy–an update. Bot. Rev. 45:15–109.Google Scholar
17. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1984. Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaf weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. Pages 243–271 in Thompson, A. C., ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy.Google Scholar
18. Siegler, D. S. 1977. Primary roles for secondary compounds. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 5:195–199.Google Scholar
19. Tukey, H. B. Jr. 1969. Implications of allelopathy in agricultural plant science. Bot. Rev. 35:1–16.Google Scholar
20. Whittaker, R. H. and Feeny, P. P. 1971. Allelochemics: Chemical interaction between species. Science. 171:757–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed