Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:44:04.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Fusarium oxysporum as a Potential Bioherbicide for Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), Coffee Senna (C. occidentalis), and Hemp Sesbania (Sesbania exaltata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Douglas Boyette ,
Hamed K. Abbas  and
William J. Connick Jr.
C. Douglas Boyette
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, South. Weed Sci. Lab, Stoneville, MS 38776: and South. Regional Res. Ctr., New Orleans, LA 70179
Hamed K. Abbas
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, South. Weed Sci. Lab, Stoneville, MS 38776: and South. Regional Res. Ctr., New Orleans, LA 70179
William J. Connick Jr.
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, South. Weed Sci. Lab, Stoneville, MS 38776: and South. Regional Res. Ctr., New Orleans, LA 70179
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A strain of Fusarium oxysporum was isolated from infected sicklepod stems in Stoneville, MS, in 1989. When formulated as granules either in a fungus-infested rice preparation or encapsulated in a wheat-gluten matrix called ‘Pesta’, biocontrol of sicklepod, coffee senna, and hemp sesbania was achieved with preemergence or preplant-incorporated treatments. Liquid conidial applications were less effective. Plants were killed by a preemergence damping-off. Applications made postemergence were significantly less effective. Results of these tests suggest that this fungus has potential as a mycoherbicide for controlling sicklepod, coffee senna, and hemp sesbania.

Keywords

Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBcoffee senna, Cassia occidentalis L. # CASOChemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata Rydb. ex A. W. Hill # SEBEXFusarium oxysporum SchletBiological controlbiological herbicidemycoherbicide
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 678 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abbas, H. K., Boyette, C. D., Hoagland, R. E., and Vesonder, R. F. Bioherbicidal potential of Fusarium moniliforme (Sheldon) and its phytotoxin, Fumonisin. Weed Sci. 39:673–677.Google Scholar
2. Boyette, C. D., Templeton, G. E., and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Texas gourd (Cucurbita texana) control with Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbita . Weed Sci. 32:649–655.Google Scholar
3. Boyette, C. D., Quimby, P. C. Jr., Connick, W. J. Jr., Daigle, D. J., and Fulgham, F. E. 1990. Production, formulation, and application of mycoherbicides. Pages 209–221 in TeBeest, D. O., ed. Microbial Control of Weeds. Chapman-Hall Publ., New York.Google Scholar
4. Connick, W. J. Jr., Boyette, C. D., and McAlpine, J. R. 1991. Formulation of mycoherbicides using a pasta-like process. Biol. Control 1:281–287.Google Scholar
5. Cook, J. R. and Baker, K. F. 1983. Pages 262–263 in The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. Am., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
6. Hildebrand, D. C. and McCain, A. H. 1978. The use of various substrates for large-scale production of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cannabis inoculum. Phytopathology 68:1099–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Panchenko, B. V. 1975. The use of Fusarium oxysporum v. orthoceras for the biological control of broomrape in Astrakran province. Trudy Vesesoyuznago Nauchiro-Isseldovatel Instuta Zaschity Rastenii 42:191–198. (In Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
8. Ridings, W. H., Mitchell, D. J., Schoulties, C. L., and El-Gholl, N. E. 1976. Biological control of milkweed vine in Florida citrus groves with a pathotype of Phytophora citrophthora. Pages 224–240 in Freeman, T. E., ed., Proc. IV Int. Symp. Biol. Control Weeds, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
9. Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1982. Impact of diseases on plant populations. Pages 47–60 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds., Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
10. Tuite, J. 1969. Pages 183–184 in Plant Pathological Methods: Fungi and Bacteria. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
11. Wapshire, A. J. 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 77:201–211.Google Scholar
12. Weidemann, G. J., Templeton, G. E., and Boyette, C. D. 1989. Biological control of Texas gourd with an endemic fungal disease. Ark. Farm Res. 37(6):14.Google Scholar
13. Weidemann, G. J., and Templeton, G. E. 1988. Efficacy and soil persistence of Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbita for control of Texas gourd (Cucurbita texana). Plant Dis. 72:36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Windels, C. E., Burnes, P. M., and Kommedahl, T. 1988. Five-year preservation of Fusarium species in silica get and soil. Phytopathology 78:107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar