Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:35:36.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Alternaria alternata for biological control of Amaranthus retroflexus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. Seel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Aberdeen, St. Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, Scotland, UK
A. Litterick
Affiliation:
Aberdeen University Centre for Organic Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen, AB24 5UA, Scotland, UK
C. Leifert
Affiliation:
Aberdeen University Centre for Organic Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen, AB24 5UA, Scotland, UK

Abstract

Amaranthus retroflexus L. is a common annual weed worldwide. It can be found in a wide range of habitats and causes substantial yield reduction in many crops mainly through competition. Alternaria spp. are airborne molds that are considered to have potential for the biological control of weeds. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of spore concentration, host-plant growth stage, dew period, and temperature on the pathogenicity of three Alternaria alternata isolates against A. retroflexus. The pathogenicity of A. alternata increased with increasing spore concentration and length of dew period. A spore concentration of 107 spores ml−1 in a rapeseed oil emulsion and given a 24 h dew period caused 100% mortality of A. retroflexus plants at the four-leaf stage. Infection and mortality in older plants (>four-leaf stage) was lower. The highest levels of plant mortality were obtained at post-inoculum temperatures between 20 and 30 C. These experiments confirm the potential of A. alternata as a mycoherbicide under specific environmental conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amsellem, Z., Sharon, A., Gressel, J., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1990. Complete abolition of high threshold of two mycoherbicides (Alternaria cassiae and Alternaria crassa) when applied in invert emulsion. Phytopath. 80:925929.Google Scholar
Barralis, G. and Gasaquez, J. 1987. Investigation on herbicide resistant weeds. European Weed Res. Soc. 38:510.Google Scholar
Charudattan, R., Walker, H. L., Boyette, C. D., Ridings, W. H., TeBeest, D. O., VanDyke, C. G., and Worsham, A. D. 1986. Evaluation of Alternaria cassiae as a mycoherbicide for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) in regional field tests. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 317, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn, AL: Auburn University. 19 p.Google Scholar
Colhoun, J. 1973. Effects of environmental factors on plant disease. Pages 343363 In Environment and Plant Disease. Manchester, England: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Connick, W. J., Daigle, D. J., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1991. An improved invert emulsion with high water retention for mycoherbicide delivery. Weed Technol. 5:442444.Google Scholar
Ghorbani, R., Seel, W., and Leifert, C. 1999. Effects of environmental factors on germination and emergence of Amaranthus retroflexus . Weed Sci. 47:505510.Google Scholar
Greaves, M. P. and MacQueen, M. D. 1990. The use of mycoherbicide in the field. Aspects of Appl. Biol. 24:163167.Google Scholar
Hong, C. X., Fitt, B.D.L., and Welham, S. J. 1996. Effects of wetness period and temperature on development of dark pod spot (Alternaria brassicae) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Pathol. 45:10771089.Google Scholar
Kigel, J., Gibly, A., and Negbi, M. 1979. Seed germination in Amaranthus retroflexus L. as affected by the photoperiod and age during flower induction of the parent plants. J. Exp. Bot. 30:9971002.Google Scholar
Mabbayad, M.O. and Watson, A. K. 1995. Biological control of gooseweed (Sphenoclea zeylanica Gaertn) with an Alternaria sp. Crop Production 14:429–423.Google Scholar
Makowski, R.M.D. 1993. Effect of inoculum concentration, temperature, dew period, and plant growth stage on disease of round-leaved mallow and velvetleaf by Colletotrichum gleosporoides f. sp. malvae . Phytopathol. 83:12291234.Google Scholar
Mintz, A. S. 1991. Evaluation of Aposphaeria amaranthi as a potential mycoherbicide for Amaranthus spp. . University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 99 pp.Google Scholar
Mintz, A.S., Heiny, D. K., and Weidemann, G. J. 1992. Factors influencing the biocontrol of tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus) with Aposphaeria amaranthi . Plant Dis. 76:267269.Google Scholar
Nielsen, D. C. and Anderson, R. L. 1994. Photosynthesis and transpiration response of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Seed Technol. 8:265269.Google Scholar
Paredes-Lopez, O. and Mora-Escobedo, R. 1989. Germination of amaranth seeds: effects on nutrient composition and colour. J. Food Sci. 54:761762.Google Scholar
Shabana, Y. M., Charudattan, R., and Elwakil, M. A. 1995. Identification, pathogenicity and safety of Alternaria eichhorniae from Egypt as a bioherbicide agent for waterhyacinth. Biol. Control 5:123135.Google Scholar
Siriwardana, G. D. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Competition between barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 32:218222.Google Scholar
TeBeest, D. O. 1991. Microbial control of weeds. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Walker, H. L. 1981. Granular formulation of Alternaria macrospora for control of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata). Weed Sci. 29:342345.Google Scholar
Washitani, I. and Takenaka, A. 1984. Germination responses of a nondormant seed population of Amaranthus patulus Bertol. to constant temperatures in the sub-optimal range. Plant Cell Environ. 7:353358.Google Scholar