Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:04:41.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the Credits and Debits of a Proposed Biofuel Species: Giant Reed (Arundo donax)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard N. Mack
Richard N. Mack*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most nonnative plants that have become naturalized and even invasive were deliberately introduced into their new range—prompting the quip that we have often “invited trouble” by enthusiastically importing species as putative sources of food, fiber, or fuel without assessing their potential damage. Gant reed is a case in point: a large, rapidly growing grass introduced long ago in the United States that has already become a riparian invader in California and Texas. Concern about the ability of giant reed to wreak environmental damage has taken on new urgency as it is now being touted as a potential biofuel feedstock. Ambitious proposals call for creation of huge plantations devoted to the grass's cultivation. Needed is neutral, comprehensive, transparent accounting of the pros and cons (literally, the credits and debits) of the widespread planting of nonnative biofuel candidates, especially giant reed. Otherwise, the United States could embark on plans to introduce giant reed throughout a much larger new range, while simultaneously paying for its removal—obviously conflicted policies.

Keywords

Giant reed, Arundo donax L.Invasive speciesintroduced speciesbiofuelinvaderwater consumptionWorking for Water Programme
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 883 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, N. 2004. Invasive horticultural crops (Part 2): where do they come from. Minn. Land. Assoc. News. 28 (4):28–33.Google Scholar
Andres, L. A., Davis, C. J., Harris, P., and Wapshere, A. J. 1976. Biological control of weeds. Pages 481–499. in Huffaker, C. B. and Messenger, P. S. Theory and Practice of Biological Control. New York Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 1993. Contingency Retrograde Washdowns: Cleaning and Inspection Procedures. [U.S.] Armed Forces Pest Management Board. Technical Information memorandum 31. Defense pest management information analysis center, http://chppmwww.apgea.army.mil/deployment/tim31(contingencyretrogradewashdowns).pdf. Accessed: April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006. Progress Energy Florida Signs Deal to Purchase Power from Pproposed Biomass Plant. Progress Energy, Raleigh, N.C. http://www.progress-energy.com/aboutus/news/article.asp?id=14062. Accessed: April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2007. Investigation of the Distribution of the Invasive Weed Arundo donax (Carrizo Grande) in the Rio Grande Basin. USDA Agricultural Research Service. http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/projects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=411759&showpars=true&fy=2007. Accessed: April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E. M. and Jongma, J. 1978. Fuelwood and charcoal in developing countries: an economic survey. Unasylva 118. http://www.fao.org/docrep/l2015e/l2015e01.htm. Accessed: April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
[AQIS] Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service 1998. The AQIS Import Risk Analysis Process: Handbook. Canberra Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service.Google Scholar
Baker, H. B. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:1–25.Google Scholar
Barney, J. N. and DiTomaso, J. M. 2008. Nonnative species and bioenergy: are we cultivating the next invader. BioScience. 58:64–70.Google Scholar
Belich, J. 1996. Making Peoples: A History of the New Zealanders, from Polynesian Settlement to the End of the Nineteenth Century. Honolulu, HI University of Hawai'i Press. 497 p.Google Scholar
Bell, G. 1994. Biology and growth habits of giant reed (Arundo donax). Pages 1–6. in Jackson, N. E., Frandsen, P., and Douthit, S. Arundo donax. Riverside, CA Workshop. Team Arundo.Google Scholar
Bell, G. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. Pages 103–113. in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Backhuys.Google Scholar
Boland, J. M. 2006. The importance of layering in the rapid spread of Arundo donax (giant reed). Madrono. 53:303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdon, J. J. and Marshall, D. R. 1981. Biological control and the reproductive mode of weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 18. 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34:183–211.Google Scholar
Dudley, T. L. 2000. Arundo donax L. Pages 53–58. in Bossard, C. C., Randall, J. M., and Hoshovsky, M. C. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eplee, R. E. 2001. Co-ordination of witchweed eradication in the USA. Pages 36. in Wittenberg, R. and Cook, M. J. W. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Practices and Management Practices. Wallingford, U.K. CAB International.Google Scholar
Erkkilä, A. and Siiskonen, H. 1992. Forestry in Namibia, 1850–1990. Joensuu, Finland University of Joensuu. 244 p.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1982. Plantation Forestry in the Tropics. Oxford Clarendon Press. 472 p.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., Alaniz, M. A., Davis, M. R., Nibling, F. L., and Deloach, C. J. 2004. Canopy spectra of giant reed and associated vegetation. Rangel. Ecol. & Manag. 57:561–569.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., and Deloach, C. J. 2005. Remote sensing of giant reed with Quickbird imagery. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 43:81–85.Google Scholar
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., and Hawthorne, P. 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science. 319:1235–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federal Register 1999. Executive Order 13112 of February 3, 1999—Invasive Species. Federal Register, Feb 8, 1999 64 (25):6183–6186.Google Scholar
Fox, A. 2007. A giant reed conundrum. Wildland Weeds. 10 (2):4–7.Google Scholar
Gaudet, D. 2002. Atlantic Salmon. A White Paper. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. www.adfg.state.ak.us/special/as/docs/as_white2002.pdf. Accessed: March 26, 2008.Google Scholar
Goeden, R. D. and Andres, L. A. 1999. Biological control of weeds in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Pages 871–890. in Bellows, T. S. and Fisher, T. W. Handbook of Biological Control: Principles and Applications of Biological Control. London Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P. and Manning, J. 2000. Cape Plants: A Conspectus of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Pretoria: National Botanical Institute of South Africa and St. Louis, MO Missouri Botanical Garden Press. 743 p.Google Scholar
Görgens, A. H. M. and van Wilgen, B. W. 2004. Invasive alien plants and water resources in South Africa: current understanding, predictive ability and research challenges. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:27–31.Google Scholar
Gould, F. W. 1975. The Grasses of Texas. College Station, TX Texas A&M University Press. 653 p.Google Scholar
Groves, R. H. 1998. Recent incursions of weeds to Australia. CRC for Weed Management Systems, Tech. Series No. 3. Adelaide University of Adelaide. 68 p.Google Scholar
Hau, L. 2006. Progress looking into grass as gas. St. Petersburg Times (Florida). May 2, 2006.Google Scholar
Heaton, E. A., Clifton-Brown, J., Voigt, T. B., Jones, M. B., and Long, S. P. 2004. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union Experience and projections for Illinois. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 9:433–451.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. 1051 p.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. 2004. The Working for Water Programme in South Africa: the science behind the success. Divers. Distrib. 10:501–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, W. H. and Erlanson, C. O. 1956. Federal plant introduction—a review. Econ. Bot. 10:299–334.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. E. 1994. Risks of species introductions in tropical forestry. Commonwealth For. Rev. 73 (4):243–252.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. E. and Styles, B. T. 1989. The benefits and risks of woody legume introductions. Pages 505–531. in Stirton, C. H. and Zarucchi, J. L. Advances in Legume Biology. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 29. St. Louis, MO Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Hundley, K. 2007. Power plant. St. Petersburg Times (Florida). February 11, 2007.Google Scholar
[IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007. Climate Change 2007—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Climate Change 2007). Geneva, Switzerland IPCC Secretariat. 976 p.Google Scholar
Isaacson, R. T. 1996. Andersen Horticultural Library's Source List of Plants & Seeds. 4th ed. Chaska, MN Anderson Horticultural Library. University of Minnesota. 332 p.Google Scholar
Iverson, M. E. 1994. The impact of Arundo donax on water resources. Pages 19–25. in Jackson, N. E., Frandsen, P., and Douthit, S. Arundo donax. Riverside, CA Workshop. Team Arundo.Google Scholar
Kuhnlein, H. V. and Turner, N. J. 1991. Traditional Plant Foods of Canadian Indigenous Peoples: Nutrition, Botany, and Use. Philadelphia, PA Gordon and Breach. 633 p.Google Scholar
Lawson, D. M., Giessow, J. A., and Giessow, J. H. 2005. The Santa Margarita River Arundo donax control project: development of methods and plant community response. Pages 229–244. in Kus, B. E. and Beyers, J. L. Planning for Biodiversity: Bringing Research and Management Together. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. tech. coord. PSW-GTR-195.Google Scholar
Leighton, A. 1976. American Gardens in the Eighteenth century: “For Use or for Delight”. Boston Houghton Mifflin. 514 p.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P., and Blackburn, T. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (5):223–228.Google Scholar
Loder, A. 2007a. Biofuel's far from flowing in Florida. St. Petersburg Times (Florida). November 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Loder, A. 2007b. Utility's biofuel plans shift. St. Petersburg Times (Florida). December 19, 2007.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W. M. and Lane, A. M. 1994. Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park, Northern Australia. Biol. Conserv. 69:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett Doust, L. 1981. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). J. Ecol. 69:743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. J. 1986. Tree planting in the Falkland Islands. Forestry. 59:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, L. R., Laser, M. S., Bransby, D., Dale, B. E., Davison, B., Hamilton, R., Himmel, M., Keller, M., McMillan, J. D., Sheehan, J., and Wyman, C. E. 2008. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:169–172.Google Scholar
Macdonald, I. A. W., Kruger, F. J., and Ferrar, A. A. 1986. The Ecology and Management of Biological Invasions in Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa Oxford University Press. 324 p.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 1999. The motivation for importing potentially invasive plant species: a primal urge. Pages 557–562 in Proceedings of the VI International Rangeland Congress. Aitkenvale, Australia VI International Rangeland Congress.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biol. Invasions. 2 (2):111–122.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 2001. Motivations and consequences of the human dispersal of plants. Pages 23–34. in McNeely, J. A. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions in Invasive Alien Species. GlandCambridge, SwitzerlandUK International Union for the Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 2005. Predicting the identity of plant invaders: future contributions from horticulture. HortScience. 40:1168–1174.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. and Erneberg, M. 2002. The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89:176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R. N. and Lonsdale, W. M. 2002. Eradicating invasive plants: hard-won lessons for islands. Pages 164–172. in Veitch, D. and Clout, M. Turning the Tide: the Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland Invasive Species Specialist Group World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689–710.Google Scholar
Magadlela, D. and Mdzeke, N. 2004. Social benefits in the Working for Water programme as a public works initiative. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:94–96.Google Scholar
Marais, C., van Wilgen, B. W., and Stevens, D. 2004. The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:97–103.Google Scholar
McCracken, D. P. 1997. Gardens of Empire: Botanical Institutions of the Victorian British Empire. London Leicester University Press. 242 p.Google Scholar
Meggs, G. 1991. Salmon. The Decline of the B.C. Fishery. Vancouver, Canada Douglas & McIntyre. 274 p.Google Scholar
Minton, M. S. 2003. Plant Naturalization: Surviving the Gauntlet of Environmental Stochasticity. PhD. dissertation. Pullman, WA Washington State University. 173 p.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1980. Firewood Crops: Shrub and Tree Species for Energy Production. Washington, DC National Academy of Sciences. 237 p.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2002. Predicting Invasions by Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, DC National Academy of Sciences. 198 p.Google Scholar
Naylor, R., Hindar, K., Fleming, I. A., et al. 2005. Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience. 55:427–437.Google Scholar
Perdue, R. E. 1958. Arundo donax—source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot. 12:368–404.Google Scholar
Pheloung, P. C. 1999. Predicting the weed potential of plant introductions. Pages 458–461. in Shepherd, R. C. H. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Weeds Conference. Meredith, Australia Weed Science Society of Victoria.Google Scholar
Polunin, O. and Huxley, A. J. 1965. Flowers of the Mediterranean. London Chatto and Windus. 257 p.Google Scholar
Raghu, S., Anderson, R. C., Daehler, C. C., Davis, A. S., Wiedenmann, R. N., Simberloff, D., and Mack, R. N. 2006. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire. Science. 313:1742.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. H. and Hamilton, C. W. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11:193–203.Google Scholar
Ridley, H. N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. Ashford, UK Kent, L. Reeve. 744 p.Google Scholar
Scott, G. D. 1993. Fire threat from Arundo donax . Pages 17–26. in Jackson, N. E., Frandsen, P., and Douthit, S. Arundo donax. Riverside, CA Workshop. Team Arundo.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, G. L. 1986. A case study of some woody plant introductions to the Cape Town area. Pages 37–43. in Macdonald, I. A. W., Kruger, F. J., and Ferrar, A. A. The Ecology and Management of Biological Invasions. Cape Town, South Africa Oxford.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. 1976. Evolution of Crop Plants. London Longman. 339 p.Google Scholar
Stone, G. W. and Finkl, C. W. 1995. Impacts of Hurricane Andrew on the Coastal Zones of Florida and Louisiana, August 22 to 26, 1992. Fort Lauderdale, FL Coastal Education and Research Foundation. 364 p.Google Scholar
Troup, R. S. 1932. Exotic forest trees in the British Empire. Oxford, UK Clarendon Press. 259 p.Google Scholar
van Wyk, D. B. 1987. Some effects of afforestation on streamflow in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Water SA. 13:31–36.Google Scholar
Versfeld, D. B., Le Maitre, D. C., and Chapman, R. A. 1998. Alien invading plants and water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. Stellenbosch, South Africa. 124 p. CSIR No. ENV/S-C 97154.Google Scholar
Volpe, J. P., Taylor, E. B., Rimmer, D. W., et al. 2000. Evidence of natural reproduction of aquaculture-escaped Atlantic salmon in a coastal British Columbia River. Conserv. Biol. 14:899–903.Google Scholar
Walton, C. S. 2001. Implementation of a permitted list approach to plant introductions to Australia. Pages 93–99. in Groves, R. H., Panetta, F. D., and Virtue, J. G. Weed Risk Assessment. Collingwood, Australia CSIRO.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. 1974. The Commerce Between The Roman Empire And India. London Curzon Press. 417 p.Google Scholar
Westbrooks, R. G. 1993. Exclusion and eradication of foreign weeds from the United States by USDA APHIS. Pages 225–241. in McKnight, B. N. Biological Pollution. The Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species. Indianapolis, IN Indiana Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Witchweed Eradication Project Status Report 2007. Plant Industry Division–Plant Protection Section. October 1, 2006–March 31, 2007. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.Google Scholar
Wood, M., Flores, A., McGinnis, L., and Peabody, E. 2007. Lassoing wicked weeds of the West. Agric. Res. 55:16–19.Google Scholar
Wunderlin, R. P. and Hansen, B. F. 2004. 2004. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu. Accessed: April 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Zohary, D. and Hopf, M. 2000. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: the Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Nile Valley. 3rd ed. New York Oxford University Press. 316 p.Google Scholar