Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:59:27.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ericameria austrotexana and Associated Range Forage Responses to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. S. Mayeux Jr. ,
C. J. Scifres  and
R. A. Crane
H. S. Mayeux Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Temple, TX 76501
C. J. Scifres
Affiliation:
Dep. Range Sci., Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., College Station, TX 77843
R. A. Crane
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., Temple, TX 76501
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Canopy cover of false broomweed (Ericameria austrotexana M.C. Johnston) on the Rio Grande Plains of Texas was initially reduced by 96% by glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] applied at 2.2 kg/ha in the spring. Acceptable control of this shrub with glyphosate lasted at least 4 yr. Glyphosate severely reduced basal cover of perennial grasses during the year of treatment, but grasses completely recovered within 2 yr after treatment. Standing forage crop increased by an average of 83%, compared to untreated areas, and livestock carrying capacity increased from 1 animal unit (AU)/13 ha to 1 AU/7 ha. Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion), and paraquat plus atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] applied in the spring were less effective than glyphosate. Canopy reductions of false broomweed 6 months after applications of 2.2 kg/ha of picloram, paraquat, or paraquat plus atrazine were equivalent to that from 1.1 kg/ha of glyphosate, and control with these herbicides was usually restricted to the season of application. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), 2,4-D-[(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], atrazine, and 2,4-D plus atrazine were not effective when applied in the spring or fall. Time required for recovery of false broomweed canopy apparently varied with amounts of rainfall received after herbicide application.

Keywords

Glyphosaterange weed controlforage responseperennial weedsfalse broomweed
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 1980 , pp. 602 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andrews, O. N. Jr., Billman, R. C., and Timmons, F. D. 1974. Glyphosate control of railroad rights-of-way vegetation in the Southwest. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:251–258.Google Scholar
2. Baur, J. R., Bovey, R. W., and Holt, E. C. 1977. Effect of herbicides on production and protein levels in pasture grasses. Agron. J. 69:846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Canode, C. L. 1974. Tolerance of five cool-season perennial grasses to selected herbicides. Agron. J. 66:801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas Res. Found., Renner. 1881 pp.Google Scholar
5. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1977. Weed control-revegetation systems for big sagebrush-downy brome rangelands. J. Range Manage. 30:331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gesink, R. W., Alley, H. P., and Lee, G. A. 1973. Vegetative response to chemical control of broom snakeweed on a blue grama range. J. Range Manage. 26:139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gould, R. W. 1969. Texas Plants. A Checklist and Ecological Summary. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. 585. 121 pp.Google Scholar
8. Hyder, D. N. 1972. Paraquat kills Geyer larkspur. J. Range Manage. 25:460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Jones, F. B. 1975. Flora of the Texas Coastal Bend. Mission Press, Corpus Christi, Texas. 262 pp.Google Scholar
10. Levy, E. B. and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method of pasture analysis. New Zeal. J. Agric. 46:276–279.Google Scholar
11. Mayeux, H. S. Jr. and Scifres, C. J. 1978. Goldenweeds. New perennial range weed problems. Rangeman's J. 3:91–93.Google Scholar
12. Mayeux, H. S. Jr., Drawe, D. L., and Scifres, C. J. 1979. Control of common goldenweed with herbicides and associated forage release. J. Range Manage. 32:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Mayeux, H. S. Jr. and Scifres, C. J. 1980. Drummond's goldenweed and its control with herbicides. J. Range Manage. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Schmutz, E. M. and Little, D. E. 1970. Effects of 2,4,5-T and picloram on broom snakeweed in Arizona. J. Range Manage. 23:354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Scifres, C. J. 1979. Brush management. Principles and Practices for Texas and the Southwest. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, Texas. 384 pp.Google Scholar
16. Sharrow, S. H. and Tober, D. A. 1979. A simple, lightweight point frame. J. Range Manage. 32:75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
18. Whitson, R. E., Hamilton, W. T., and Scifres, C. J. 1979. Techniques and considerations for economic analysis of brush control alternatives. Texas Agric. Exp. Sta., Dep. Range Sci. Tech. Rep. 7801. 38 pp. (mimeo).Google Scholar
19. Wicks, G. A., Fenster, C. R., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Selective control of plains prickly pear in rangeland with herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar