Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:21:48.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancement of Herbicides by Silicone Surfactants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. L. Jansen
L. L. Jansen*
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Agr. Res. Center, Agr. Envir. Qual. Inst., Beltsville, Maryland 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In comparative evaluation of adjuvant effects in eight species, nonionic silicone-glycol surfactants enhanced the activity of six herbicides to a greater extent than a standard organic surfactant, whereas cationic amino silicone surfactants enhanced to a lesser extent. The efficacy of the nonionic silicones was associated with (a) a greater enhancing action in species, particularly grasses, that were relatively resistant to herbicides applied without adjuvants and (b) a greater ability to enhance herbicides with very low water solubility. The cationic silicones in combination with some of the herbicides provided less enhancement in moderately sensitive crops than did the standard organic surfactant but provided equivalent enhancement on some weeds. The threshhold concentration for enhancement by silicone-glycols was 0.01% in a susceptible species and 0.1% in a resistant species. In yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), a silicone-glycol surfactant at a concentration of 0.5% provided greater enhancement of several herbicides than any of three organic surfactants or an emulsifiable oil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 130 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Fieser, L. F. and Fieser, Mary. 1944. Organic chemistry. D. C. Heath and Company, Boston. 1091 p.Google Scholar
2. Jansen, L. L. 1964. Relation of structure of ethylene oxide ether-type nonionic surfactants to herbicidal activity of water soluble herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Jansen, L. L. 1964. Surfactant enhancement of herbicide entry. Weeds 12:251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jansen, L. L. 1965. Effects of structural variations in ionic surfactants on phytotoxicity and physical-chemical properties of aqueous sprays of several herbicides. Weeds 13:117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jansen, L. L. 1971. Morphology and photoperiodic responses of yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kramer, C. Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal number of replications. Biometrics 12:307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Marvel, C. S. and Horning, E. C. 1943. Synthetic polymers. Pages 701–778 in Gilman, H. [ed.], Organic chemistry, Vol. I. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 1077 p.Google Scholar
9. Shellhorn, S. J. and Hull, H. M. 1971. A carrier for some water-soluble herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar