Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:16:49.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Germination and Emergence of Dormant Wild Mustard (Sinapsis arvensis) Seed by Two Substituted Phthalimides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William W. Donald
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Metabolism and Radiation Res. Lab./Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Roland A. Hoerauf
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Metabolism and Radiation Res. Lab./Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Applications of the substituted phthalimide growth regulators AC-94377 [1-(3-chlorophthalimido)cyclohexanecarboximide] and AC-99524 [1-tetrahydrophthalimido-cyclohexanecarboximide] to the soil surface stimulated germination and emergence of dormant wild mustard seed (Sinapsis arvensis L. ♯4 SINAR) shallowly planted in soil in greenhouse experiments. Surface applications of AC-94377 enhanced the germination and emergence of dormant wild mustard seed planted 0.6 cm deep in soil from nine locations as the rates were raised from 0.4 to 3.7 kg ai/ha. Surface application of AC-94377 increased emergence rates and also extended the period of wild mustard emergence. Increasing quantities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw on the soil surface reduced the effect of surface-applied AC-94377 on shallowly buried dormant wild mustard seed. When dormant wild mustard seed were buried 1.3, 2.5, or 3.8 cm deep, surface applications of AC-94377 also stimulated greater emergence than the dormant controls from these depths, strongly suggesting that the compound moved from the surface to the depth of planting.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. N. 1968. Germination and Establishment of Weeds for Experimental Purposes. W. F. Humphrey Press, New York. 236 pp.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164168.Google Scholar
3. Barker, G. L., Buehring, N. W., Whisler, F. D., and Colwick, R. F. 1982. Application of herbicides in small grain stubble. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 25:12321236.Google Scholar
4. Chakrabarti, A. G. 1976. Effect of selected growth retardants on the germinability of weed seeds. J. Seed Technol. 1:6063.Google Scholar
5. Chew, V. 1977. Comparisons among treatment means in an analysis of variance. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv./H/6. 64 pp.Google Scholar
6. Edwards, M. M. 1969. Dormancy in seeds of charlock. IV. Interrelationships of growth, oxygen supply and concentration of inhibitor. J. Exp. Bot. 20:876894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Edwards, M. 1980. Aspects of the population ecology of charlock. J. Appl. Ecol. 17:151171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Egley, G. H. and Dale, J. E. 1970. Ethylene, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid, and witchweed germination. Weed Sci. 18:586589.Google Scholar
9. Embling, S. J., Cotterill, E. G., and Hance, R. J. 1983. Effect of heat-treating soil and straw on the subsequent adsorption of chlortoluron and atrazine. Weed Res. 23:357363.Google Scholar
10. Eplee, R. E. 1975. Ethylene: a witchweed seed germination stimulant. Weed Sci. 23:433436.Google Scholar
11. Eplee, R. E. and Langstron, M. A. 1976. Developments in the control of Striga in the U.S.A. PANS 22:6164.Google Scholar
12. Everson, L. 1949. Preliminary studies to establish laboratory methods for the germination of weed seed. Proc. Assoc. Off. Seed Anal. 39:8489.Google Scholar
13. Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1975. Germination stimulation properties of carbamate herbicides. Weed Sci. 23:419424.Google Scholar
14. Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, R. W. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:594596.Google Scholar
15. Fay, P. K. and Gorecki, R. S. 1978. Stimulating germination of dormant wild oat (Avena fatua) seed with sodium azide. Weed Sci. 26:323326.Google Scholar
16. Fay, P. K., Gorecki, R. S., and Fuerst, P. M. 1980. Coating sodium azide granules to enhance seed germination. Weed Sci. 28:674677.Google Scholar
17. Fogg, G. E. 1950. Biological flora of the British Isles No. 146. Sinapis arvensis L. J. Ecol. 38:415429.Google Scholar
18. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York. 892 pp.Google Scholar
19. Holm, R. E. 1972. Volatile metabolites controlling germination in buried weed seeds. Plant Physiol. 50:293297.Google Scholar
20. Kleinbaum, D. G. and Kuper, L. L. 1978. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Durbury Press, North Scituate, MA. 556 pp.Google Scholar
21. Metzger, J. D. 1983. Promotion of germination of dormant weed seeds by substituted phthalimides and gibberellic acid. Weed Sci. 31:285289.Google Scholar
22. Roberts, H. A. 1983. Seed banks in soil. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6: 155.Google Scholar
23. Sexsmith, J. J. and Pittman, U. J. 1963. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers on germination and stand of wild oats. Weeds 11:99101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Skidmore, E. L. and Siddoway, F. H. 1978. Crop residue requirements to control wind erosion. Pages 1733 in Oschwald, W. R., ed. Crop Residue Management Systems. ASA Special Publication No. 31. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
25. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. 776 pp.Google Scholar
26. Suttle, J. C. and Schreiner, D. R. 1982. The biological activity of AC-94377 [1-(3-chlorophthalimido)-cyclohexane-carboxamide]. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1:139146.Google Scholar
27. Warnes, D. D. and Anderson, R. N. 1984. Decline of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) seeds in soil under various cultural and chemical practices. Weed Sci. 32:214217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Witcombe, J. R. and Whittington, W. J. 1972. The effects of selection for reduced dormancy in charlock (Sinapis arvensis). Heredity 29:3749.Google Scholar