Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:10:14.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Manitoba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Arvel N. Lawson ,
Rene C. Van Acker  and
Lyle F. Friesen
Arvel N. Lawson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Rene C. Van Acker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observational studies of weed emergence provide essential data for the creation and testing of predictive emergence models, with data ideally being collected from a wide range of sites representing a range of environments under which the seedlings of a given species emerge. The spring emergence of genetically engineered glyphosate-resistant volunteer canola was monitored in 20 farmers' commercial wheat fields over 2 yr, 2003 and 2004, in the southwestern region of Manitoba, Canada. Three different tillage systems, low-disturbance direct-seeded, high-disturbance direct-seeded, and conventionally tilled fields, were represented in this sample. Tillage system did not significantly influence the emergence periodicity of volunteer canola, but did influence total densities observed. Total volunteer canola densities in the surveyed fields were variable and ranged from 6 to 2,015 seedlings m−2. Conventionally tilled fields had the lowest densities of volunteer canola seedlings, and high-disturbance direct-seeded fields (no autumn tillage) had the highest densities. Volunteer canola is a relatively early spring emerging plant species requiring minimal accumulated growing degree days for emergence (calculated using a base temperature of 5 C). Emergence curves were steep, with a short window of volunteer canola emergence either prior to or within a spring-seeded wheat crop. To determine what proportion of autumn-broadcast canola seed (simulated harvest losses) would recruit the following spring and the influence of fall or spring tillage on this recruitment, a small plot experiment also was conducted at three sites. The following spring the percentage of canola seedlings that emerged ranged from 1.3 to 9.4% of the seed broadcast, depending upon the tillage treatment. The effect of tillage treatment on canola densities in the small plot experiment was similar to the field survey results.

Keywords

Canola, Brassica napus L. BRSNSspring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. TRZASEmergence timingemergence densitytillagevolunteer canolapersistencegrowing degree days
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 873 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alm, D. M., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1993. An index model for predicting seed germination and emergence rates. Weed Technol. 7:560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Hall, L. M., and Warwick, S. I. 2001. Impact of herbicide resistant crops as weeds in Canada. Pages 135–142 in British Crop Protection Council ed. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 2001. Surrey, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., Nair, H., and Séguin-Swartz, G. 2003. Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Ecol. Appl. 13:1276–1294.Google Scholar
Bullied, W. J., Marginet, A. M., and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. Conventional- and conservation-tillage systems influence emergence periodicity of annual weed species in canola. Weed Sci. 51:886–897.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Thomas, W. E., Pline-Srnić, W. A., Fisher, L. R., Smith, W. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2005. Yield and physiological response of flue-cured tobacco to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol. 19:255–260.Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2001. An Agronomic and Economic Assessment of Transgenic Canola. http://www.canola-council.org/report_gmo.html.Google Scholar
Chepil, W. S. 1946a. Germination of weed seeds: I. Longevity, periodicity of germination and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Sci. Agric. 26:307–346.Google Scholar
Chepil, W. S. 1946b. Germination of weed seeds: II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agric. 26:347–357.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1991. Emergence periodicity of six summer annual weed species. Weed Sci. 39:595–600.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, W. A., Pratt, L. E., and Poyser, E. A. 1956a. Report of reconnaissance soil survey of Rossburn and Virden map sheet areas. Carman, MB, Canada: Manitoba Agriculture and Food.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, W. A., Pratt, L. E., and Poyser, E. A. 1956b. Report of reconnaissance soil survey of Carberry map sheet area. Carman, MB, Canada: Manitoba Agriculture and Food.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 2004. National Climate Archive. www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1993. Seedling emergence model for velvetleaf. Agron. J. 85:929–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, L. F., Nelson, A. G., and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. Evidence of contamination of pedigreed canola (Brassica napus) seedlots in western Canada with genetically engineered herbicide resistance traits. Agron. J. 95:1342–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghorbani, R., Seel, W., and Leifert, C. 1999. Effects of environmental factors on germination and emergence of Amaranthus retroflexus . Weed Sci. 47:505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Pages 294–308 in Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gray, R. S., Taylor, J. S., and Brown, W. J. 1996. Economic factors contributing to the adoption of reduced tillage technologies in central Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:661–668.Google Scholar
Gruber, S., Pekrun, C., and Claupein, W. 2005. Life cycle and potential gene flow of volunteer oilseed rape in different tillage systems. Weed Res. 45:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulden, R. H., Shirtliffe, S. J., and Thomas, A. G. 2003a. Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci. 51:83–86.Google Scholar
Gulden, R. H., Shirtliffe, S. J., and Thomas, A. G. 2003b. Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada. Weed Sci. 51:904–913.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., Blackshaw, R. E., O'Donovan, J. T., Johnson, E. N., Gan, Y., Holm, F. A., Sapsford, K. L., Irvine, R. B., and Van Acker, R. C. 2006. Persistence of glyphosate-resistant canola in western Canadian cropping systems. Agron. J. 98:107–119.Google Scholar
Herr, D. E. and Stroube, E. W. 1970. Velvetleaf control as influenced by herbicide placement and seed depth. Weed Sci. 18:459–461.Google Scholar
Knott, C. M. 1993. Control of volunteer oilseed rape in peas. Pages 889–894 in British Crop Protection Council ed. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 1993. Surrey, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R 2 . Am. Stat. 39:279–285.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. 2005. Emergence timing of volunteer canola (Brassica napus L.) in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields in Manitoba. , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 148 p.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie Weed Surveys of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publication 05-1. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395 p.Google Scholar
Légère, A., Simard, M. J., Thomas, A. G., Pageau, D., Lajeunesse, J., Warwick, S. I., and Derksen, D. A. 2001. Presence and persistence of volunteer canola in Canadian cropping systems. Pages 143–148 in British Crop Protection Council ed. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 2001. Surrey, Great Britain: British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
López-Granados, F. and Lutman, P. J. W. 1998. Effect of environmental conditions on the dormancy and germination of volunteer oilseed rape seed (Brassica napus). Weed Sci. 46:419–423.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. and López-Granados, F. 1998. The persistence of seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Asp. Appl. Biol. 51:147–152.Google Scholar
Marginet, A. M. 2001. Effect of tillage system and eco-regional field location cluster on the emergence periodicity of wild oat and green foxtail. , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 120 p.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. J., McVetty, P. B. E., and Shaykewich, C. F. 1989. The determination and verification of a baseline temperature for the growth of Westar summer rape. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:455–464.Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. and Thompson, B. K. 1981. Presentation of experimental results. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:799–802.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.Google Scholar
Oryokot, J. O. E., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Effect of tillage and corn on pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) seedling emergence in different tillage systems. Weed Sci. 45:120–126.Google Scholar
Pekrun, C., Lutman, P. J. W., and Baemer, K. 1997. Induction of secondary dormancy in rape seeds (Brassica napus L.) by prolonged imbibition under conditions of water stress or oxygen deficiency in darkness. Eur. J. Agron. 6:245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, C., Hewitt, J. D. L., and Lutman, P. J. W. 1998. Cultural control of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 130:155–163.Google Scholar
Reimer, A. and Shaykewich, C. F. 1980. Estimation of Manitoba soil temperatures from atmospheric meteorological measurements. Can. J. Soil Sci. 60:299–309.Google Scholar
Rieger, M. A., Lamond, M., Preston, C., Powles, S. B., and Roush, R. T. 2002. Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science. 296:2386–2388.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J., Entz, M. H., and Van Acker, R. C. 2000. Avena fatua development and seed shatter as related to thermal time. Weed Sci. 48:555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada. 1986–2004. Field Crop Reporting Series. Crops Section, Agriculture Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0T6, Canada. Summary tabulated by the Canola Council of Canada. http://www.canola-council.org/oilmealsupplydemand.html.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Bullied, W. J., and du Croix Sissons, M. J. 2004. Tillage index predicts weed seedling recruitment depth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:319–326.Google Scholar
Vigil, M. F., Anderson, R. L., and Beard, W. E. 1997. Base temperature and growing-degree-hour requirements for the emergence of canola. Crop Sci. 37:844–849.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in soil. Weed Sci. 40:429–433.Google Scholar