Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:43:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergence and Growth of Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with Various Planting and Herbicide Incorporation Depths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw ,
Hector P. Rainero ,
Clyde A. Smith ,
Marshall B. Wixson ,
W.R.A.S. Ratnayake ,
Stacey A. Bruff  and
Larry J. Newsom
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Hector P. Rainero
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Clyde A. Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Marshall B. Wixson
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
W.R.A.S. Ratnayake
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Stacey A. Bruff
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate effects of sicklepod planting depths and chlorimuron, imazaquin, and metribuzin incorporation depths on sicklepod seedling emergence and growth. There was 35 and 90% sicklepod seedling emergence from 0- and 2-cm planting depths, respectively, in untreated soil 26 days after planting; emergence decreased with each additional increment below 2 cm. Chlorimuron at 63 g ai ha reduced the number of plants present 11 days after planting at 1- and 2-cm planting depths except when unincorporated. However, deeper sicklepod planting required chlorimuron incorporation to at least 6 cm for maximum reduction of plants. Imazaquin at 140 g ai ha was not as effective as chlorimuron, but a reduction in the number of plants was noted at 1- and 2-cm planting depths when imazaquin was incorporated to 4, 6, or 8 cm. Metribuzin at 420 g ai ha consistently reduced the number of plants at all incorporation depths except when unincorporated but had little effect on emergence. Chlorimuron and imazaquin reduced sicklepod dry weight most for all planting depths when incorporated 4 to 10 and 6 to 10 cm, respectively. Metribuzin reduced sicklepod biomass at all incorporation depths.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyi]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo- 1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onesicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBChlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinCASOB
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4-5 , September 1990 , pp. 401 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Chapter 3: Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Creel, J. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Elmore, C. D. 1988. Weed survey–Southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:395–410.Google Scholar
5. Fortino, J. Jr. and Splittstoesser, W. E. 1973. Response of tomato to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 22:460–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hargroder, T. G. and Rogers, R. L. 1973. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in soybeans and hemp sesbania. Weed Sci. 22:238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Patterson, M. G., Everest, J. W., and Monks, C. D. 1976. Effect of sicklepod seed density on herbicide efficacy. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:399.Google Scholar
9. Scruggs, J. W., Coats, G. E., and Heering, D. C. 1986. Postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.) in grain sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:42.Google Scholar
10. Shaw, D. R. 1987. Sicklepod control in soybeans with Canopy, Scepter, and Classic. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 12, No. 20.Google Scholar
11. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Smith, C. A., Shaw, D. R., and Wixson, M. B. 1990. Reducing sicklepod interference with soybeans by preplant applications of imazaquin or chlorimuron plus metribuzin. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 30:161.Google Scholar
13. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wesley, R. A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Incorporation depths of imazaquin, metribuzin, and chlorimuron for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:596–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wiedman, S. J. and Appleby, A. P. 1972. Plant growth stimulation by sublethal concentrations of herbicides. Weed Res. 12:65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar