Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:26:10.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy and Rotational Crop Response to Levels and Dates of Dinitroaniline Herbicide Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. R. Abernathy  and
J. W. Keeling
J. R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Lubbock, TX 79401
J. W. Keeling
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Lubbock, TX 79401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-α,α,α-rifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro 2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine], fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], and USB 3153 (N3,N3-di-N-propyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) were applied to evaluate weed control, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Dunn 119′) tolerance, and effect on rotational crops. Each herbicide was applied at 1-month intervals for 6 months prior to planting at 1, 1.25, 1.5, and 2X the recommended rates. Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. and A. retroflexus L.) population counts and visual control ratings showed that weed control improved when treatments were applied closer to planting. Applications in November and December at 1.25X profluralin, 1.5X trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, 1X USB 3153, and 2X butralin were required to give effective weed control. Spring applications of 1X rates of profluralin, trifluralin, fluchloralin, and USB 3153, 1.25X rates of pendimethalin and dinitramine and 1.5X rate of butralin were required for adequate weed control. USB 3153 at all rates and dates of application severely limited growth and yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Funk 332′) planted after harvest and also the following May. Spring applications of profluralin at 1.5 and 2X rates and trifluralin at the 2X rate resulted in significant injury of rotational sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Dekalb E-59+’].

Keywords

Preplant incorporationsoil residueherbicidesoil persistencedinitroaniline
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 312 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1968. Weed control. Nat. Acad. Sci. Publ. 1597:174–175.Google Scholar
2. Caruthers, C. G., Abernathy, J. R., and Keeling, J. W. 1976. Rotational crop response to ppm determinations of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:82.Google Scholar
3. Hollist, R. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Trifluralin interactions with soil constituents. Weed Sci. 19:11–16.Google Scholar
4. Miller, J. H., Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Soil persistence of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 23:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Robison, L. R. and Fenster, C. R. 1968. Residual effect of EPTC and trifluralin incorporated with different implements. Weed Sci. 16:415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Savage, K. E. 1974. Persistence of six dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:387.Google Scholar
7. Weaver, D. N. 1976. Herbicides used in cotton in 1975. Weed Sci. Newsletter. Vol. 13.Google Scholar
8. Weber, J. B. and Scott, D. C. 1966. Availability of a cationic herbicide adsorbed on clay materials to cucumber seedlings. Science 152:1400–1402.Google Scholar
9. Wiese, A. F., Chenault, E. W., and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1969. Incorporation of preplant herbicides for cotton. Weed Sci. 17:481–483.Google Scholar