Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:43.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Storage and Burial on Germination Responses of Encapsulated and Naked Seeds of Turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) to Light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sara Ohadi ,
Hamid R. Mashhadi  and
Reza Tavakol-Afshari
Sara Ohadi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
Hamid R. Mashhadi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
Reza Tavakol-Afshari
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information on the germination and viability of turnipweed seeds could be helpful in developing appropriate management strategies for this weed. Therefore, experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of light, storage conditions, duration of storage or burial, and seed type (naked, i.e., fruit wall was removed and encapsulated in siliques) on germination and viability of turnipweed. The naked and encapsulated seeds (fruit) were kept under five different storage conditions, including dry storage at 25 ± 2 C and 3 ± 1 C and outdoor environments (soil depths of 10, 20, and 40 cm). All seeds were retrieved every 2 mo and tested for germination in light and darkness. At each exhumation date, nongerminated seeds were treated with triphenyltetrazolium chloride to test their viability. The germination of seeds liberated from siliques (85%) was markedly greater than that of seeds in intact siliques (20%). The germination response of naked and encapsulated seeds to light varied between storage conditions and through time. Under indoor conditions (room and cold), both seed types had greater germination percentages in dark on most occasions than those in light. On the contrary, the germination of siliques buried at soil depths of 20 or 40 cm was considerably stimulated by light. Under indoor conditions, the percent viability of both seed types only declined marginally, whereas seeds buried in soil showed high rates of mortality. Seeds in intact siliques persisted longer under either indoor or outdoor conditions than naked seeds.

Keywords

Turnipweed, Rapistrum rugosum (L.) AllGerminationseed photosensitivitystorage conditionviability
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 483 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Melbourne School of Land & Environment, Department of Resource Management & Geography, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, R. N. 1968. Germination and Establishment of Weeds for Experimental Purposes. 1st ed. Urbana, IL Weed Science Society of America. 236 p.Google Scholar
Baskin, C., Milberg, P., Andersson, L., and Baskin, J. 2004. Germination ecology of seeds of the annual weeds Capsella bursa-pastoris and Descurainia sophia originating from high northern latitudes. Weed Res. 44:60–68.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1986. Temperature requirements for after-ripening in seeds of nine winter annuals. Weed Res. 26:375–380.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1989. Germination responses of buried seeds of Capsella bursa pastoris exposed to seasonal temperature changes. Weed Res. 29:205–212.Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R., Sánchez, R., Forcella, F., Kruk, B., and Ghersa, C. 2000. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res. 67:105–122.Google Scholar
Blaney, C. and Kotanen, P. 2002. Persistence in the seed bank: the effects of fungi and invertebrates on seeds of native and exotic plants. Ecoscience. 9:509–517.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. and Hartzler, R. 2001. Emergence and persistence of seed of velvetleaf, common waterhemp, woolly cupgrass, and giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 49:230–235.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B., Gill, G., and Preston, C. 2006. Factors affecting turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) seed germination in southern Australia. Weed Sci. 54:1032–1036.Google Scholar
Colbach, N., Chauvel, B., Dürr, C., and Richard, G. 2002. Effect of environmental conditions on Alopecurus myosuroides germination. I. Effect of temperature and light. Weed Res. 42:210–221.Google Scholar
Cousens, R., Armas, G., and Baweja, R. 1994. Germination of Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. from New South Wales, Australia. Weed Res. 34:127–135.Google Scholar
Crist, T. and Friese, C. 1993. The impact of fungi on soil seeds: implications for plants and granivores in a semiarid shrub-steppe. Ecology. 74:2231–2239.Google Scholar
Deloui, M. H., Mahallati, M. N., Noormohammadi, G., and Mashhadi, H. R. 2003. Modeling light interception and distribution in mixed canopies of wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) and turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) in competition with wheat. Iran. J. Agric. Sci. 5:134–145.Google Scholar
Fenner, M. and Thompson, K. 2005. The ecology of seeds. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 250 p.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D. S. H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1984. The influence of burial and dry-storage upon cyclic changes in dormancy, germination and response to light in seeds of various arable weeds. New Phytol. 96:471–481.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Arnold, R. L. B., and Martinez-Ghersa, M. A. 1992. The role of fluctuating temperature in germination and establishment of Sorghum halopense regulation of germination at increasing depths. Funct. Ecol. 6:460–468.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. and Mollwo, A. 2000. The action spectrum for maximal photosensitivity of germination. Naturwissenschaften. 87:398–403.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. and Nezadal, W. 1990. Photocontrol of weeds without herbicides. Naturwissenschaften. 77:158–163.Google Scholar
Juroszek, P. and Gerhards, R. 2004. Photocontrol of weeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:402–415.Google Scholar
Mahesh, M. Q., Upadhyaya, K., and Turkington, R. 1996. Dynamics of seed bank and survivorship of meadow salsify (Trogopogon pratensis) populations. Weed Sci. 44:100–108.Google Scholar
Mennan, H. and Zandstra, B. 2006. The effects of depth and duration of seed burial on viability, dormancy, germination, and emergence of ivyleaf speedwell (Veronica hederifolia). Weed Technol. 20:438–444.Google Scholar
Milberg, P. 1990. What is the maximum longevity of seeds? Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 84:323–352.Google Scholar
Milberg, P. 1997. Weed seed germination after short-term light exposure: germination rate, photon fluence response and interaction with nitrate. Weed Res. 37:157–164.Google Scholar
Milberg, P. and Andersson, L. 1997. Seasonal variation in dormancy and light sensitivity in buried seeds of eight annual weed species. Can. J. Bot. 75:1998–2004.Google Scholar
Mirkamali, H. 2004. Manual of Weed Identification and Control in Wheat Crop. 2nd ed. Karaj, Iran Agricultural Education Publishing. 226 p.Google Scholar
Morpeth, D. and Hall, A. 2000. Microbial enhancement of seed germination in Rosa corymbifera ‘Laxa’. Seed Sci. Res. 10:489–494.Google Scholar
Mulligan, G. A. and Bailey, L. G. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. Sinapis arvensis L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:171–183.Google Scholar
Noronha, A., Andersson, L., and Milberg, P. 1997. Rate of change in dormancy level and light requirement in weed seeds during stratification. Ann. Bot. 80:705–801.Google Scholar
Pons, T. 1992. Seed responses to light. Pages 259–284 in Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, CT CAB International.Google Scholar
Qi, M., Upadhyaya, M., and Turkington, R. 1996. Dynamics of seed bank and survivorship of meadow salsify (Tragopogon pratensis) populations. Weed Sci. 44:100–108.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballaré, C. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1994. Photosimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126:145–152.Google Scholar
Scopel, A., Ballaré, C., and Sanchez, R. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations. Plant. Cell Environ. 14:501–508.Google Scholar
Sester, M., Dürr, C., Darmency, H., and Colbach, N. 2006. Evolution of weed beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed bank: quantification of seed survival, dormancy, germination and pre-emergence growth. Eur. J. Agron. 24:19–25.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Ceriani, R. M., Bakker, J. P., and Bekker, R. M. 2003. Are seed dormancy and persistence in soil related? Seed Sci. Res. 13:97–100.Google Scholar
Vleeshouwers, L., Bouwmeester, H., and Karssen, C. 1995. Redefining seed dormancy: an attempt to integrate physiology and ecology. J. Ecol. 83:1031–1037.Google Scholar