Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:33:26.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Shade on Silverleaf Nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Boyd  and
Don S. Murray
John W. Boyd
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plants started with seed, 'seedlings', and established plants of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.) were grown in the field under shade levels of 0, 47, 63, and 92% of full sunlight to determine vegetative, reproductive, and physiological responses to shade. Dry-matter production of both 'seedling’ and established plants declined markedly with increasing shade levels. Established plants did not bear fruit under 92% shade, and 63% shade prevented fruit production by 'seedlings'. Taproots of plants grown in full sunlight contained 16% more total non-structural carbohydrate (TNC) per gram dry weight than taproots of plants grown under 92% shade. Leaves of established plants grown under moderate shade had significantly more chlorophyll per unit leaf fresh weight than plants grown in full sunlight; however, plants under heavy (92%) shade had 35% less chlorophyll per unit leaf area than unshaded plants. The chlorophyll a/b ratio of the 92%-shaded plants was significantly less than with other treatments. Leaf area increased, with increasing shade; however, leaf weight per unit area decreased because of thinner leaves. Photosynthetic rates of recently expanded leaves were 10.4, 4.6, 3.3, and 0.9 mg CO2 · dm−2 · h−1 for the 0, 47, 63, and 92% shade treatments, respectively.

Keywords

Carbohydrateschlorophyll contentseedlingsperennialsphotosynthetic rate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 264 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. 1979. Silverleaf nightshade control in cotton with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:380.Google Scholar
2. Baake, A. L. and Gaessler, W. G. 1945. The effect of reduced light intensity on the aerial and subterranean parts of European bindweed. Plant Physiol. 20:246–257.Google Scholar
3. Bjorkman, O. and Holmgren, P. 1963. Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol. Plant. 16:889–914.Google Scholar
4. Boardman, N. K. 1977. Comparative photosynthesis of shade and sun plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Clough, J. M., Teeri, J. A., and Alberte, R. S. 1979. Photosynthetic adaptation of Solanum dulcamara L. to sun and shade environments. I. A comparison of sun and shade populations. Oecologia (Berlin) 38:13–21.Google Scholar
6. Cooper, C. S. 1966. Response of birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa to various levels of shade. Crop Sci. 6:63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cooper, C. S. and Quails, M. 1967. Morphology and chlorophyll content of the shade and sun leaves of two legumes. Crop Sci. 7:672–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Crookston, R. K., Treharne, K. J., Ludgord, P., and Ozbun, J. L. 1975. Response of beans to shading. Crop Sci. 15:412–416.Google Scholar
9. Cuthbertson, E. G. 1976. Silverleaf nightshade – A potential threat to agriculture. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 87:11–13.Google Scholar
10. D'Arcy, W. G. 1974. Solanum and its close relatives in Florida. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 61:819–867.Google Scholar
11. Davis, C. H., Smith, T. J., and Hawkins, R. S. 1945. Eradication of the white horsenettle in southern Arizona. Ariz. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 195. 14 pp.Google Scholar
12. Egle, K. 1960. Menge und Verhaltnis der Pigmente. Pages 452–496 in Ruhland, W., ed. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Vol. 5, no. 1. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
13. Gunn, C. R. and Gaffney, F. B. 1974. Seed characteristics of 42 economically important Solanaceae in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 1471. 31 pp.Google Scholar
14. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1978. Light requirements of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and light interception by crops. Weed Sci. 26:10–16.Google Scholar
15. Knake, E. L. 1972. Effect of shade on giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 20:588–592.Google Scholar
16. Meyer, B. S., Anderson, D. B., Bohning, R. H., and Fratianne, D. G. 1973. Introduction to Plant Physiology, pp 443–445. D. Van Nostrand Co., New York.Google Scholar
17. Moosavi-Nia, H. and Dore, J. 1979. Factors affecting glyphosate activity in Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. and Cyperus rotundus L. 2. Effect of shade. Weed Res. 19:321–327.Google Scholar
18. Pallas, J. E., Neves, J. D., and Beaty, E. R. 1971. Light quality under saran shade cloth. Agron. J. 63:657–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Patterson, D. T. 1979. Methodology and terminology for the measurement of light in weed studies – A review. Weed Sci. 27:437–443.Google Scholar
20. Patterson, D. T. 1979. Effects of shading on the growth and development of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata . Weed Sci. 27:549–553.Google Scholar
21. Patterson, D. T. 1980. Effects of shading on growth and partitioning of biomass in cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) from shaded and exposed habitats. Weed Sci. 28:735–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Smith, D. 1981. Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Univ. Wis. Coll. Agric. Life Sci. Res. Div. Res. Rep. No. 2107. 7 pp.Google Scholar
23. Smith, D. T., Wiese, A. F., and Cooley, A. W. 1973. Crop losses from several annual and perennial weeds. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. pp. 53–54.Google Scholar
24. Spiro, R. G. 1966. Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. Complete carbohydrates. Pages 4–5 in Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 8. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
25. Taylorson, R. B. and Borthwick, H. A. 1969. Light filtration by foliar canopies: Significance for light controlled weed seed germination. Weed Sci. 17:48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wintermans, J.F.G.M. and deMots, A. 1965. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophyll a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 109:448–453.Google Scholar
27. Wolf, D. D., Pearce, R. B., Carlson, G. E., and Lee, D. R. 1969. Measuring photosynthesis of attached leaves with air sealed chambers. Crop Sci. 9:24–27.Google Scholar