Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:44:02.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Late-Season Herbicide Applications on Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Seed Production and Viability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Isaacs
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Edward C. Murdock
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Joe E. Toler
Affiliation:
Statistics Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Susan U. Wallace
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634

Abstract

Application of chlorimuron and imazaquin at 0.28 kg ai/ha to field-grown sicklepod at early bloom and early fruit stages in 1984 and 1985 almost eliminated seed production. In addition, none of the seed produced following these treatments were capable of emergence during a 4-week period following acid scarification. Glyphosate applied at 0.28 kg ai/ha at early bloom decreased seed production 84% but did not affect seedling emergence in 1984, and precluded production of seed capable of emergence in 1985. Glyphosate applications at the early fruit stage reduced the number of seed that emerged 93 and 90% in 1984 and 1985, respectively. Application of 2,4-DB at 0.28 kg ai/ha and 2,4-D at 0.56 kg ai/ha at early bloom did not affect seed production or emergence in 1984 but almost eliminated production of seed capable of emergence in 1985. Applications of 2,4-DB and 2,4-D at the early fruit stage decreased the number of seed that emerged 99 and 52% in 1984 and 46 and 57% in 1985, respectively. Herbicide applications at the late fruit stage were generally less effective than earlier applications in reducing seed production and emergence.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Jordan, L. S., and Kumamoto, J. 1979. Enhancement of CO2 and ethylene production and cellulase activity by glyphosate in Phaseolus vulgaris . Weed Sci. 27:103106.Google Scholar
2. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Resumption of growth. Pages 119157 in Weed-Crop Ecology. Principles in Weed Management. Bartlett, J. P. and Pitcher, J. H., eds. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
3. Biniak, B. M. and Aldrich, R. J. 1986. Reducing velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seed production with simulated-roller herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 34:256259.Google Scholar
4. Bridges, D. C. and Walker, R. H. 1985. Influence of weed management and cropping systems on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed in the soil. Weed Sci. 33:800804.Google Scholar
5. Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-ethyl (Classic): a new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybeans. Weed Technol. 1:114115.Google Scholar
6. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter): a new soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1:186188.Google Scholar
7. Creel, J. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396400.Google Scholar
8. Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531535.Google Scholar
9. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: Spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seeds after 2.5 years in a 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 26:230239.Google Scholar
11. Elmore, C. D. Chairman. 1986. Weed survey. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:136158.Google Scholar
12. English, L. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1981. Influence of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) density on plant growth and seed production. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:250.Google Scholar
13. Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of 2,4-D and dalapon on weed seed production and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:543547.Google Scholar
14. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1984. Chlorsulfuron induction of leaf abscission in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 32:132137.Google Scholar
15. Hill, E. R., Lachman, W. H., and Maynard, D. W. 1963. Translocation of amitrole in yellow nutsedge and its effects on seed germination. Weeds 11:165166.Google Scholar
16. Maun, M. A. and Cavers, P. B. 1969. Effects of 2,4-D on seed production and embryo development of curly dock. Weed Sci. 17: 533536.Google Scholar
17. Murphy, T. R., Gossett, B. J., and Toler, J. E. 1986. Dormancy and field burial of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seed. Weed Sci. 34:260265.Google Scholar
18. Sherman, M. E., Thompson, L. Jr., and Wilkinson, R. E. 1983. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:662–627.Google Scholar
19. Smith, L. H. 1984. Seed development, metabolism, and composition. Pages 1352 in Physiological Basis of Crop Growth and Development. Tesar, M. B., ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
20. Taylorson, R. B. 1966. Control of seed production in three annual grasses by dimethylarsinic acid. Weeds 14:207210.Google Scholar