Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:04:45.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Chlorimuron on Soybean (Glycine max) and Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) as Influenced by Application Timing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Timothy E. Adcock  and
Philip A Banks
Timothy E. Adcock
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Philip A Banks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of chlorimuron as related to application timing were evaluated on sicklepod and soybean in the glasshouse. Plants were sprayed with chlorimuron at 8.8 g ai ha–1 at 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after planting (DAP). Early (14 DAP) chlorimuron application reduced sicklepod dry weight, leaf area, and water use to levels significantly less than those of plants treated at 28 and 35 DAP. Soybean dry weight and leaf area were not affected by chlorimuron. However, soybean water use was initially reduced at application timings of 28 DAP or earlier but recovered by 4 weeks after treatment (WAT). Sicklepod net assimilation rate (NAR) and relative growth rate (RGR) were reduced by chlorimuron regardless of application timing while soybean was not affected.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2 - pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Wright’sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBPlant recoverynet assimilation raterelative growth rateCASOB
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 139 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonylurea herbicides. Pages 117—189 in Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C. and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management. Weed Sci. 35:594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Thurlow, D. L., and Rodgers, H. T. 1970. Control of sicklepod in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:148–161.Google Scholar
4. Edmond, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Patterson, D. T. 1982. Effect of light and temperature on weed/crop growth and competition. Pages 407—421 in Hatfield, J. L. and Thomason, I. S., eds. Biometeorology and Integrated Pest Management. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Talbert, R. E. Chairman. 1984. Weed survey—southern states research report. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:196–197.Google Scholar
7. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar