Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:56:42.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of Metribuzin Applied Preemergence for Economical Control of Common Cocklebur in Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. G. McWhorter  and
J. M. Anderson
C. G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
S. Weed Sci. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr. and Agr. Econ., Delta Branch, Mississippi Agr., Stoneville, MS 38776
J. M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effectiveness of several preemergence and postemergence weed control systems for control of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was determined in field research over a 3-yr period. Sequential applications of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] at 1.1 kg/ha applied preemergence, and dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) at 1.7 kg/ha, 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid] at 0.2 kg/ha, or bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4)3H-one 2,2-dioxide] at 1.1 kg/ha applied postemergence, provided at least 90% control of common cocklebur and increased soybean yields. Use of single herbicide applications was less effective than sequential applications, but metribuzin applied preemergence was more effective in controlling common cocklebur and increasing soybean yields than single applications of any herbicide applied postemergence. Effective control of common cocklebur with sequential herbicide treatments increased soybean seed grades by reducing discounts caused by several grade lowering components including moisture content and foreign material in harvested seed. Use of all herbicide practices increased returns above specified costs, but greatest returns followed use of sequential treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 1976 , pp. 385 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W.L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cooke, F.T. Jr., Anderson, J.M., and Heagler, A.M. 1972. Crop budgets and planning data for major farm enterprise in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta. Miss. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 794. 56 pp.Google Scholar
3. Green, D.E., Cavanah, L.E., and Pinnell, E.L. 1966. Effect of seed moisture content, field weathering, and combine cylinder speed on soybean seed quality. Crop Sci. 6:7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hauser, E.W., Dowler, C.C., and Marchant, W.H. 1969. Progress report: systems of weed control for soybeans. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:97.Google Scholar
5. Hay, J.R. 1974. Gains to the grower from weed science. Weed Sci. 22:439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hicks, D.R., Pendleton, J.W., Bernard, R.L., and Johnston, T.J. 1969. Response of soybean plant types to planting patterns. Agron. J. 61:290–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hunt, D.R. and Harper, R.W. 1968. Timeliness in harvesting soybeans. Soybean News 20(1):1–2.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Park, J.D. and Webb, B.K. 1959. Soybean harvesting losses in South Carolina. South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 123. 8 pp.Google Scholar
10. Staniforth, D.W. 1962. Responses of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1970. Official grain and standards of the United States. Pages 8.1–8.6 in Official Grain Standards of the United States. Revised Ed., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
12. Vengris, J., Drake, M., Colby, W.G., and Bart, J. 1953. Chemical composition of weeds and accompanying crop plants. Agron. J. 45:213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Waldrep, T.W. and McLaughlin, R.D. 1969. Cocklebur competition and control. Soybean Farmer 3:26–27, 30.Google Scholar
14. Wax, L.M. 1973. Weed control. Pages 417–457 in Caldwell, B.E., ed. Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
15. Wilcox, J.R., Laviolette, F.A., and Athow, K.L. 1974. Deterioration of soybean seed quality associated with delayed harvest. Plant Dis. Rep. 58(2): 130–133.Google Scholar