Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:02:53.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Wounding on Primary Dormancy in Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Caryopses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael E. Foley
Michael E. Foley*
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mechanical wounding broke dormancy and promoted germination of primary dormant pure-line wild oat (Avena fatua L. # AVEFA) caryopses that were in the first physiological stage of dormancy. Caryopses incubated in petri dishes responded to wounding by germinating more rapidly than wounded caryopses incubated in soil. There was no difference in germination between wounded and lanolin-covered wounded caryopses when incubated in soil. The less dormant AN265 caryopses responded to the wounding treatment more rapidly than the more dormant caryopses of M73 in both petri dish and soil incubation systems. Chlorocholine chloride (CCC), an inhibitor of gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis, reduced the germination rate of wounded AN265 and M73 caryopses above and at 1 mM, respectively. Application of 25 mM CCC to wounded dormant AN265 caryopses decreased the level of hexose in the embryo to 47% of the control level. There was no significant effect of CCC on the endosperm hexose, embryo and endosperm imbibed fresh weight, and sucrose and starch content. The results suggest GA or GA biosynthesis is the limiting factor to germination.

Keywords

Chlorocholine chloridegibberellic acidAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 180 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adkins, S. W., Simpson, G. M., and Naylor, J. M. 1984. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua. III. Action of nitrogenous compounds. Physiol. Plant. 60:227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Adkins, S. W., Naylor, J. M., Simpson, G. M. 1984. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua. V. Action of ethanol and other organic compounds. Physiol. Plant. 62:18–24.Google Scholar
3. Akazawa, T. and Hara-Nishimara, I. 1985. Topographic aspects of biosynthesis, extracellular secretion, and intercellular storage of proteins in plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36:441–472.Google Scholar
4. Atwood, W. M. 1914. A physiological study of the germination of Avena fatua . Bot. Gaz. 57:386–414.Google Scholar
5. Bewley, J. D. and Black, M. 1982. Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds in Relation to Germination. Vol. 2: Viability, Dormancy, and Environmental Control. Springer-Verlag, New York. 375 pp.Google Scholar
6. Chen, S.S.C. and Park, W. 1973. Early actions of gibberellic acid on the embryo and on the endosperm of Avena fatua seeds. Plant Physiol. 52:174–176.Google Scholar
7. Hsiao, A. I., McIntyre, G. I., and Haines, J. A. 1983. Seed dormancy in Avena fatua. I. Induction of germination by mechanical injury. Bot. Gaz. 144:217–222.Google Scholar
8. Jana, S., Acharya, N., and Naylor, J. M. 1979. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 10. On the inheritance of germination behavior. Can. J. Bot. 57:1663–1667.Google Scholar
9. Jones, M.G.K., Outlaw, W. H. Jr., and Lowry, O. H. 1977. Enzymic assay of 10−7 to 10−14 moles of sucrose in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 60:379–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. McIntyre, G. I. and Hsiao, A. I. 1985. Seed dormancy in Avena fatua. II. Evidence of embryo water content as a limiting factor. Bot. Gaz. 146:347–352.Google Scholar
11. Metzger, J. D. 1983. Role of endogenous plant growth regulators in seed dormancy of Avena fatua. II. Gibberellins. Plant Physiol. 73:791–795.Google Scholar
12. Naylor, J. M. 1983. Studies on the genetic control of some physiological processes in seeds. Can. J. Bot. 61:3561–3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Naylor, J. M. and Jana, S. 1976. Genetic adaptation for seed dormancy in Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 54:306–312.Google Scholar
14. Naylor, J. M. and Simpson, G. M. 1961. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 2. A gibberellin-sensitive inhibitory mechanism in the embryo. Can. J. Bot. 39:281–295.Google Scholar
15. Outlaw, W. H. Jr. and Manchester, J. 1979. Guard cell starch concentration quantitatively related to stomatal aperture. Plant Physiol. 64:79–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1979. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 9. Demonstration of genetic variability affecting the response to temperature during seed development. Can. J. Bot. 57:59–63.Google Scholar
17. Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1980. Dormancy studies in seeds of Avena fatua. 12. Influences of temperature on germination behavior of nondormant families. Can. J. Bot. 58:578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 13. Influence of drought stress during seed development and duration of seed dormancy. Can. J. Bot. 60:1016–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sembdner, G., Gross, D., Leibisch, H. W., and Schneider, G. 1980. Biosynthesis and metabolism of plant hormones. Pages 281–444 in Macmillan, J., ed. Hormonal Regulation of Development. I. Molecular Aspects of Plant Hormones. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Simpson, G. M. and Naylor, J. M. 1962. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 3. A relationship between maltase, amylase, and gibberellin. Can. J. Bot. 40:1659–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Upadhyaya, M. K., Naylor, J. M., and Simpson, G. M. 1982. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua L. I. Action of the respiratory inhibitors sodium azide and salicylhydroxamic acid. Physiol. Plant. 54:419–424.Google Scholar