Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:24:54.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Straw Mulch Level on Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald A. Crutchfield ,
Gail A. Wicks  and
Orvin C. Burnside
Donald A. Crutchfield
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Gail A. Wicks
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, West Central Res. and Ext. Ctr., North Platte, NE 69101
Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, West Central Res. and Ext. Ctr., North Platte, NE 69101
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine the effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw mulch level on weed control in a winter wheat-ecofallow corn (Zea mays L.)-fallow rotation at North Platte and Sidney, NE, in 1981 and 1982. Wheat straw mulch was established at 0, 1.7, 3.4, 5.1, and 6.8 Mg/ha in stubble fields. After application of 1.5 times the recommended rate at corn planting, metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] concentration remained higher in unmulched soil than in mulched soil for more than 4 months, due to interception of metolachlor by the mulch. Even though the amount of metolachlor in the soil was reduced by mulch, weed control was not reduced and increased with increasing mulch level. Thus, increasing metolachlor rate was not necessary to maintain adequate weed control in no-till winter wheat stubble since mulch itself provided some measure of weed control.

Keywords

Conservation tillageecofarmingno-tillmetolachlorZea mays L.
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 110 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1983. Activity of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor as affected by straw. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. (Abstr.). 36:394.Google Scholar
3. Bauman, T. T. and Ross, M. A. 1983. Effect of three tillage systems on the persistence of atrazine. Weed Sci. 31:423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Carlson, D. R. 1980. Control of weeds in an oat (Avena sativa)-soybean (Glycine max) ecofarming rotation. Weed Sci. 28:46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Day, B. E., ed. 1968. Principles of plant and animal pest control. Vol. 2, Weed Control. NAS-NRC, Washington, DC. Pages 84–85.Google Scholar
6. Elliott, L. F., McCalla, T. M., and Waiss, A. Jr. 1978. Phytotoxicity associated with residue management. Pages 131–146 in Oschwald, W. R., ed. Crop Residue Management Systems. ASA Special Publication No. 31, Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Erbach, D. C. and Lovely, W. G. 1975. Effect of plant residue on herbicide performance in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 23:512–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Freund, A. J., and Littell, R. C. 1981. SAS For Linear Models: A Guide to the ANOVA and GLM Procedures. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Pages 22–25.Google Scholar
9. Gerber, H. R., Mueller, G., and Ebner, L. 1974. CGA 24705, a new grasskiller herbicide. Proc. 12th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 787–794.Google Scholar
10. Ghadiri, H., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1984. Interception and retention of atrazine by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble. Weed Sci. 32:24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ghadiri, H., Shea, P. J., Wicks, G. A., and Haderlie, L. C. 1984. Atrazine dissipation in conventional-till and no-till sorghum. J. Environ. Qual. 13:549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Greb, B. W. 1967. Percent soil cover by six vegetative mulches. Agron. J. 59:610–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hoefer, R. H., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Grain yields, soil water storage, and weed growth in a winter wheat-corn-fallow rotation. Agron. J. 73:1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kells, J. J., Rieck, C. E., Blevins, R. L., and Muir, W. M. 1980. Atrazine dissipation as affected by surface pH and tillage. Weed Sci. 28:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kimber, R.W.L. 1973. Phytotoxicity from plant residues. II. The effect of time of rotting of straw from some grasses and legumes on the growth of wheat seedlings. Plant Soil 38:347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1983. Tillage and mulch effects on morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and certain other weed species. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 36:405–414.Google Scholar
17. Lowder, S. W. and Weber, J. B. 1982. Atrazine efficacy and longevity as affected by tillage, liming, and fertilizer type. Weed Sci. 30:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Petersen, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Phillips, R. E., Blevins, R. L., Thomas, G. W., Frye, W. W., and Phillips, S. H. 1980. No-tillage agriculture. Science 208:1108–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Prihar, S. S., Sandhu, K. S., and Khera, K. L. 1975. Maize (Zea mays L.) and weed growth, as affected by levels of straw mulching with and without herbicide under conventional and minimum tillage. Indian J. Ecol. 2:13–22.Google Scholar
21. SAS Institute Inc. 1982. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1982 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Pages 101–110.Google Scholar
22. Strek, H. J. and Weber, J. B. 1981. Alachlor (Lasso) and metolachlor (Dual) comparisons in conventional and reduced tillage systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:33–40.Google Scholar
23. Strek, H. J. and Weber, J. B. 1982. Adsorption, mobility, and activity comparisons between alachlor (Lasso) and metolachlor (Dual). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:332–338.Google Scholar
24. Triplett, G. B. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Unger, P. W. 1975. Role of mulches in dryland agriculture. Pages 240–258 in Gupta, U. S., ed. Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
26. Wesson, G. and Wareing, P. F. 1967. Light requirements of buried seed. Nature (London) 21:600–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Whitfield, C. J. 1982. A Standardized Procedure for Residue Sampling. ARS 41–68, U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
28. Wicks, G. A. 1976. Ecofallow: a reduced tillage system for the Great Plains. Weeds Today 9(2):20–23.Google Scholar
29. Williams, J. L. Jr. and Wicks, G. A. 1978. Weed control problems associated with crop residue systems. Pages 165–172 in Oschwald, W. R., ed. Crop Residue Management Systems. ASA Special Publication No. 31, Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar