Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:59.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Trifluralin on Mitosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. M. Lignowski  and
E. G. Scott
E. M. Lignowski
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, West Virginia 26506
E. G. Scott
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, West Virginia 26506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The compound α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) inhibited mitosis in onion (Allium cepa L. ‘Yellow Globe’) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Thorn’) root tips. Photomicrographs showed that trifluralin affected mitosis in the same manner as colchicine. Arrested metaphases, c-pairs, micronuclei, amoeboid nuclei, and polyploidy were observed at various times after treatment. An increase in the percentage of arrested metaphases and a decrease in anaphase and telophase figures after 3 hr showed that mitosis was being blocked at metaphase. Prophase did not appear to be affected. Centrifugation of treated root tips displaced the chromosomes of arrested metaphases indicating that the spindle apparatus was disrupted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 1972 , pp. 267 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amato, V. A., Hoverson, R. R., and Hacskaylo, J. 1965. Microanatomical and morphological responses of corn and cotton to trifluralin. Proc. Assoc. So. Agr. Workers, p. 234 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
2. Bayer, D. E., Foy, C. F., Mallory, T. W., and Cutter, E. G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. Amer. J. Bot. 54:945–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Croker, B. H. 1953. Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on mitosis in Allium cepa . Bot. Gaz. 114:274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Doxey, D. 1949. The effect of isopropyl phenyl carbamate on mitosis in rye (Secale cerale) and onion (Allium cepa) . Ann. Bot. 13:329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eigsti, O. J. and Dustin, P. Jr. 1955. Colchicine — In Agriculture, Medicine, Biology, and Chemistry. The Iowa State College Press, Ames. 470 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ennis, W. B. 1948. Some cytological effects of O-isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate upon Avena . Amer. J. Bot. 35:15–21.Google Scholar
7. Feeny, R. 1966. Effect of trifluralin on the growth of oat seedlings and respiration of excised oat roots. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:595–603.Google Scholar
8. Fischer, B. B. 1966. The effect of trifluralin on the root development of seedling cotton. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb. 6:214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Jensen, W. V. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 408 p.Google Scholar
10. Levan, A. 1938. The effect of colchicine on root mitosis in Allium . Hereditas 24:471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Liang, G. H., Feltner, K. C., Liang, Y. T., and Morrell, J. L. 1967. Cytogenetic effects and responses of agronomic characters in grain sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) following atrazine application. Crop Sci. 7:245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lignowski, E. M. and Scott, E. G. 1971. Trifluralin and root growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 12:701–708.Google Scholar
13. Sawamura, S. 1964. Cytological studies on the effect of herbicides on plant cells in vivo. I. Hormonic herbicides. Cytologia (Tokyo) 29:86–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Standifer, L. C. and Thomas, C. H. 1965. Response of Johnsongrass to soil-incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13: 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Unrau, J. and Larter, E. N. 1952. Cytological responses of cereals to 2,4-D. I. A study of meiosis of plants treated at various stages of growth. Can. J. Bot. 30:22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wilson, G. 1965. The assay of antimitotics. Chromosoma (Germany) 16:133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed