Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:23:39.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Sodium Bisulfate on the Phytotoxicity, Retention, Foliar Uptake, and Translocation of Imazamethabenz on Wild Oats (Avena fatua L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Shu Hua Liu
Affiliation:
Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina; Res. Sci., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, SK; Prof., Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina, Regina, SK, S4S OA2; Biol. and Tech., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, S4P 3A2, Canada
Andrew I. Hsiao
Affiliation:
Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina; Res. Sci., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, SK; Prof., Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina, Regina, SK, S4S OA2; Biol. and Tech., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, S4P 3A2, Canada
William A. Quick
Affiliation:
Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina; Res. Sci., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, SK; Prof., Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina, Regina, SK, S4S OA2; Biol. and Tech., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, S4P 3A2, Canada
Thomas M. Wolf
Affiliation:
Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina; Res. Sci., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, SK; Prof., Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina, Regina, SK, S4S OA2; Biol. and Tech., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, S4P 3A2, Canada
Judith A. Hume
Affiliation:
Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina; Res. Sci., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Regina, SK; Prof., Dep. Bio., Univ. Regina, Regina, SK, S4S OA2; Biol. and Tech., Agri. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, SK, S4P 3A2, Canada

Abstract

Studies determined the effect of sodium bisulfate (NaHSO4) on the phytotoxicity, retention, uptake, and translocation of the suspension concentrate formulation of imazamethabenz in wild oats. NaHSO4 completely solubilized this herbicide formulation when added in an equimolar concentration and did not affect herbicidal activity at NaHSO4 concentrations below 28 mM when used in a carrier volume of 100 L ha−1. NaHSO4 improved phytotoxicity at a carrier volume of 33 L ha−1. NaHSO4 at 28 mM increased the efficacy of imazamethabenz applied as individual drops on growth chamber-grown wild oats. The herbicide retention was not changed but foliar absorption and acropetal translocation were increased, while basipetal translocation was decreased. The increase in phytotoxicity of imazamethabenz with NaHSO4 was related to absorption of imazamethabenz by the target plants.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Akesson, N. B., Steinke, W. E., and Bayer, D. E. 1992. Spray atomization responses to agricultural formulation adjuvants. Pages 289301 in Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1993. Weed Control in Field and Forage Crops. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. ISSN 0833-112X. 144 pp.Google Scholar
3. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1990. Effect of rate, carrier volume, and surfactant on imazamethabenz efficacy. Weed Technol. 4:291293.Google Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347, 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. Little, D. L. and Shaner, D. L. 1991. Absorption and translocation of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 5369 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
6. Liu, S. H. 1993. Phytotoxicity of imazamethabenz-methyl as influenced by additives and other selected herbicides. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Regina, SK, Canada. 234 pp.Google Scholar
7. Liu, S. H., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1992. Effects of sodium bisulphate, acidic buffers and ammonium sulphate on imazamethabenz phytotoxicity to wild oats. Crop Prot. 11, 335340.Google Scholar
8. McMullan, P. M. 1992. Effect of adjuvant and acidifying agent on imazamethabenz efficacy. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:13891392.Google Scholar
9. Prutton, C. F. and Maron, S. H. 1951. Fundamental Principles of Physical Chemistry. Revised. The MacMillan Co., New York, pp. 474513.Google Scholar
10. Shaner, D. L., Simcox, P. D., Robson, P. A., Mangels, G., Reichert, B., Ciarlante, D. R., and Los, M. 1982. AC 222,293—Translocation and metabolic selectivity. Proc. 1982 Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds. pp. 333339.Google Scholar
11. Smith, A. M. and Chow, P.N.P. 1990. The influence of Agral 90 surfactant on the activity of imazamethabenz in wild oats (Avena fatua L.). Weed Res. 30:355362.Google Scholar
12. van Valkenburg, W. A. 1982. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. Pages 19 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
13. Wells, A. J. 1989. Adjuvants, glyphosate efficacy and post-spraying rainfall. Plant Prot. Quarterly. 4:158164.Google Scholar
14. Wepplo, P. 1991. Chemical and physical properties of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 1530 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
15. Wolf, T. M., Grover, R., Wallace, K., Shewchuk, S. R., and Maybank, J. 1993. Effect of protective shield on drift and deposition characteristics of field sprayers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:12611273.Google Scholar