Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:55:24.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Site of Application of 14C-Fluazifop on Its Uptake and Translocation by Quackgrass (Agropyron repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nimal R. Chandrasena
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology, Univ. College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, U.K.
Geoff R. Sagar
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology, Univ. College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, U.K.

Abstract

The effect of site of application on uptake and translocation of the butyl ester of fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} by quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. # AGRRE] was investigated using 14C-labeled herbicide and intact plants. Uptake and distribution of the label were significantly greater from the abaxial than from the adaxial surface of leaves. The addition of a nonionic surfactant4 to the treatment solution increased the uptake significantly only through the adaxial surface. Uptake of 14C by the apical, middle, and basal regions of the treated leaf lamina did not differ significantly. However, movement of the 14C-label to stem areas and leaves both above and below treated leaves was greater from lamina base applications than from treatments to the lamina apex and middle. The older leaves absorbed more herbicide than did younger leaves, but the pattern of translocation did not differ. Considerably greater translocation occurred from treatments to the outside of the leaf sheaths in the lower regions of the stem than from applications to the upper leaf sheaths, with the 14C-label moved to young and old leaves, roots, and rhizomes. Uptake from applications to the outside of the upper leaf sheaths also resulted in improved translocation mainly within the stem areas and into upper leaves.

Keywords

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agbakoba, C.O.S. and Goodin, J. R. 1969. Effect of stage of growth of field bindweed on absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled 2,4-D and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:436438.Google Scholar
2. Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28:277281.Google Scholar
3. Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Herbicide Entry into Plants in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides – Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. I., Academic Press, London. Pages 335364.Google Scholar
4. Chandrasena, J.P.N.R. and Sagar, G. R. 1984. Effects of fluazifop-butyl on shoot growth and rhizome buds of Elymus repens (L.) Gould. Weed Res. 24:297303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chandrasena, N. R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Uptake and translocation of 14C fluazifop by quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 34:676684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Coupland, D., Taylor, W. A., and Caseley, J. C. 1978. The effect of site of application on the performance of glyphosate and Agropyron repens and barban, benzoylprop-ethyl, and difenzoquat on Avena fatua . Weed Res. 18:123128.Google Scholar
7. Davis, D. G. 1971. Scanning electron microscopic studies of wax formations on leaves of higher plants. Can. J. Bot. 49:543546.Google Scholar
8. Dewey, A. S. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. A comparison between glyphosate and assimilate translocation patterns in tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea). Weed Sci. 31:308314.Google Scholar
9. Foden, P. C. 1972. Factors affecting efficacy of foliage-applied herbicides. Application factors. Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. 11291145.Google Scholar
10. Gibbard, M., Smith, M. R., and Stoddart, G. B. 1982. Annual and perennial grass weed control with fluazifop-butyl in oilseed rape, potatoes, and other broad-leaved crops. Proc. Br. Crop Protection Conf.-Weeds 18:819825.Google Scholar
11. Hendley, P., Dicks, J. W., Monaco, T. J., Slyfield, S. M., Tummon, O. J., and Barrett, J. C. 1985. Translocation and metabolism of pyridinyloxy-phenoxy propionate herbicides in rhizomatous quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 33:1124.Google Scholar
12. Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Res. Rev. 31:1155.Google Scholar
13. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.Google Scholar
14. Knott, C. M. 1982. Post-emergence control of grass weeds in peas with fluazifop-butyl. Proc. Br. Crop Protection Conf. – Weeds 18:803809.Google Scholar
15. Muzik, T. J. 1976. Influence of Environmental Factors on Toxicity in Plants in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides – Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. II. Academic Press, London. Pages 203248.Google Scholar
16. Palmer, J. H. and Sagar, G. R. 1963. Biological flora of the British Isles No. 93, Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. J. Ecol. 51:783794.Google Scholar
17. Plowman, R. E., Stonebridge, W. C., and Hawtree, J. N. 1980. Fluazifop-butyl, a new selective herbicide for the control of annual and perennial grass weeds. Proc. Br. Crop Protection Conf. – Weeds 2937.Google Scholar
18. Veerasekaran, P., Kirkwood, R. C., and Fletcher, W. W. 1977. Studies on the mode of action of asulam in bracken (Pteridium aquilinum L. Kuhn) I. Absorption and translocation of (14C) asulam. Weed Res. 17:3339.Google Scholar
19. Wardlaw, I. F. 1968. The control and pattern of movement of carbohydrates in plants. Bot. Rev. 34:79105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting toxicity and translocation of glyphosate in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26:509512.Google Scholar