Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:10:28.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Salinity on Growth of Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), Horse Purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum), Junglerice (Echinochloa colona), and Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bhagirath S. Chauhan*
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines
Seth B. Abugho
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines
Junrey C. Amas
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Genetics and Biotechnology Division, International Rice Research Institute
Glenn B. Gregorio
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Genetics and Biotechnology Division, International Rice Research Institute
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In Asia, a significant area under rice is affected by salinity. Salt stress can affect growth of crops as well as weeds. A study was conducted in a greenhouse to determine the effect of salinity (electrical conductivity [EC] of 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 dS m−1) on growth of barnyardgrass, horse purslane, junglerice, and rice. Growth variables were analyzed using regression analysis. The tested levels of EC influenced leaf production of barnyardgrass and junglerice but not that of horse purslane. As compared with the control treatment (EC of 1 dS m−1), shoot biomass of barnyardgrass decreased by only 24% at 12 dS m−1, whereas rice biomass declined by 59% at this level of EC. At EC of 24 dS m−1, barnyardgrass still produced 4% of the biomass of the control treatment, whereas rice did not survive at this level of EC. Junglerice shoot biomass decreased by 73% at 18 dS m−1 EC compared with the control treatment, whereas rice shoot biomass declined by more than 86% at 18 dS m−1 EC. An EC of 10 dS m−1 was required to inhibit 50% shoot biomass of rice, whereas the EC to inhibit 50% shoot biomass of barnyardgrass and junglerice was 15 and 13 dS m−1, respectively. Shoot biomass of horse purslane was not influenced by the tested levels of EC. At the highest EC (24 dS m−1), at which rice did not survive, horse purslane shoot biomass was similar to that of the control treatment. In all weed species, data for root biomass showed trends similar to those of shoot biomass. The results of this study suggest that weeds were more tolerant to salt than rice, and horse purslane was the most tolerant species among the weeds.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Chauhan, B. S. 2012. Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technol. 26: 113.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Abugho, S. B. 2012. Effect of growth stage on the efficacy of postemergence herbicides on four weed species of direct-seeded rice. Sci. World J. 7 Article ID 123071. 7 p.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2009a. Influence of tillage systems on weed seedling emergence pattern in rainfed rice. Soil Till. Res. 106: 1521.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2009b. Seed germination ecology of junglerice (Echinochloa colona): a major weed of rice. Weed Sci. 57: 235240.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2010. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv. Agron. 105: 221262.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S., Mahajan, G., Sardana, V., Timsina, J., and Jat, M. L. 2012. Productivity and sustainability of the rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: problems, opportunities, and strategies. Adv. Agron. 117: 315369.Google Scholar
Galinato, M. I., Moody, K., and Piggin, C. M. 1999. Upland Rice Weeds of South and Southeast Asia. Makati City (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute. 156 p.Google Scholar
Gregorio, G. B., Senadhira, D., and Mendoza, R. D. 1997. Screening rice for salinity tolerance. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 22. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 30 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Israelsen, K. R., Ransom, C. V., and Waldron, B. L. 2011. Salinity tolerance of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) and desirable pasture grasses. Weed Sci. 59: 500505.Google Scholar
Lafitte, H. R., Ismail, A., and Bennett, J. 2006. Abiotic stress tolerance in tropical rice: progress and future prospects. Oryza 43: 171186.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Chauhan, B. S., and Johnson, D. E. 2011. Germination of fresh horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) seeds in response to different environmental factors. Weed Sci. 59: 495499.Google Scholar
Maas, E. V. and Hoffman, G. J. 1977. Crop salt tolerance: current assessment. J. Irrig. Drain. Divi. ASCE 103: 115134.Google Scholar
Maun, M. A. and Barrett, S.C.H. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 77. Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 739759.Google Scholar
Munns, R. and Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59: 651681.Google Scholar
Nakhoda, B., Leung, H., Mendioro, M. S., Mohammadi-nejad, G., and Ismail, A. M. 2012. Isolation, characterization, and field evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L., Var. IR64) mutants with altered responses to salt stress. Field Crops Res. 127: 191202.Google Scholar
Yang, H., Huang, Z., Baskin, C. C., Baskin, J. M., Cao, Z., Zhu, X., and Dong, M. 2009. Response of caryopsis germination, early seedling growth and ramet clonal growth of Bromus inermis to soil salinity. Plant Soil 316: 265275.Google Scholar