Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:55:54.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Nitrogen on the Glyphosate-Induced Inhibition of Rhizome Bud Growth in Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James H. Hunter ,
Andrew I. Hsiao  and
Gordon I. Mcintyre
James H. Hunter
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2, Canada
Andrew I. Hsiao
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2, Canada
Gordon I. Mcintyre
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In experiments conducted under controlled conditions, glyphosate-induced inhibition of rhizome bud growth in quackgrass was reduced by increasing the nitrogen (N) concentration in the nutrient solution from 10.5 to 210 mg L−1 either 2 or 4 d before foliar application of the herbicide, and for 7 d after the herbicide treatment. The additional N reduced the glyphosate-induced inhibition of rhizome growth on the intact plant at the lowest glyphosate dosage (2.8 μg per plant) but had no significant effect at higher dosages. Both the 2- and 4-d high N treatments significantly increased the length, dry weight, and water content of the lateral buds by the time the herbicide was applied. They also increased bud growth on the glyphosate-treated plants during the 7 d following the herbicide application and promoted release of the buds from inhibition during a subsequent bioassay of their regenerative growth on excised, single-node rhizome segments. These effects of N supply interacted significantly with glyphosate dosage, bud position on the rhizome, and duration of incubation. It is postulated that bud growth response to increased N supply may reduce the inhibiting effect of the herbicide by diluting the glyphosate concentration in the bud, or that the additional N may counteract the toxic action of glyphosate on amino acid metabolism or protein synthesis.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl) glycinequackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski #3 AGRRECorrelative bud inhibitionperennial weedsAGRRE
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 426 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Caseley, J. C. and Coupland, D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. Pages 92–123 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
2. Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149–152.Google Scholar
3. Cole, D. J., Caseley, J. C., and Dodge, A. D. 1983. Influence of glyphosate on selected plant processes. Weed Res. 23:173–183.Google Scholar
4. Cole, D. J., Dodge, A. D., and Caseley, J. C. 1980. Some biochemical effects of glyphosate on plant meristems. J. Exp. Bot. 31:1665–1674.Google Scholar
5. Coupland, D. 1989. Factors affecting the phloem translocation of foliage-applied herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 25:323–325.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. 1964. Herbicide behaviour in the plant. Pages 75–100 in Audus, L. J., ed. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
7. Devine, M. D. 1989. Phloem translocation of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:191–213.Google Scholar
8. Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. Pages 1–70 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D. eds. Herbicides. Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
9. Duke, S. O., Hoagland, R. E., and Elmore, C. D. 1979. Effects of glyphosate on metabolism of phenolic compounds. IV. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, free amino acids, and soluble hydroxyphenolic compounds in axes of light-grown soybeans. Physiol. Plant. 46:307–317.Google Scholar
10. Goebel, K. 1900. Organography of plants, especially of the Archegoniatae and Spermaphyta. Part 1. General Organography. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 270 pp.Google Scholar
11. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides in quackgrass, Agropyron repens . Weed Sci. 36:463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1938. The water culture method of growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347.Google Scholar
13. Hoagland, D. R., Duke, S. O., and Elmore, C. D. 1979. Effects of glyphosate on metabolism of phenolic compounds. III. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, free amino acids, soluble protein and hydroxyphenolic compounds in axes of dark-grown soybeans. Physiol. Plant. 46:357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. McIntyre, G. I. 1967. Environmental control of bud and rhizome development in the seedling of Agropyron repens L. Beauv. Can. J. Bot. 45:1315–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. McIntyre, G. I. 1969. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Evidence of competition for carbohydrate as a factor in the mechanism of inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 47:1189–1197.Google Scholar
16. McIntyre, G. I. 1972. Studies on bud development in the rhizome of Agropyron repens II. The effect of the nitrogen supply. Can. J. Bot. 50:393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McIntyre, G. I. 1990. The correlative inhibition of bud growth in perennial weeds: a nutritional perspective. Pages 27–47 in Foy, C. L., ed. Rev. Weed Sci., 5.Google Scholar
18. McIntyre, G. I. and Hsiao, A. I. 1982. Influence of nitrogen and humidity on rhizome bud growth and glyphosate translocation in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 30:655–660.Google Scholar
19. Nigam, S. N. and McIntyre, G. I. 1977. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens: the relation of amino acid composition to bud activity. Can. J. Bot. 55:2001–2010.Google Scholar
20. Parker, C. 1976. Effects on the dormancy of plant organs. Pages 165–190 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
21. Qureshi, F. A. and McIntyre, G. I. 1979. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens: the influence of nitrogen and humidity on the translocation of 14C-labelled assimilates. Can. J. Bot. 57:1229–1235.Google Scholar
22. SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. The GLM Procedure. Pages 891–996 in SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. ISBN 1-55544-376-1.Google Scholar
23. Schirman, R. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1960. The effect of atrazine on the carbohydrate levels in rhizomes of quackgrass. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 17:37.Google Scholar
24. Turner, D. J. 1966. A study of the effects of rhizome length, soil nitrogen and shoot removal on the growth of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Proc. 8th Br. Weed Control Conf. Vol. 2:538–545.Google Scholar
25. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557–566.Google Scholar