Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:20:44.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Naptalam on Chloramben Toxicity, Uptake, Translocation, and Metabolism in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry D. Knerr ,
Herbert J. Hopen  and
Nelson E. Balke
Larry D. Knerr
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Herbert J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Nelson E. Balke
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies demonstrated that naptalam safens cucumber against the phytotoxic effects of chloramben. In petri dish studies, cucumber seedlings grown from seeds exposed to chloramben plus naptalam had greater shoot growth, root growth, and dry weight than seedlings grown from seeds exposed to chloramben alone. Naptalam also partially reversed the reduction in dry weight of various plant parts caused by exposure of roots of hydroponically grown seedlings to chloramben. More radioactivity from root-applied 14C-chloramben remained in cucumber roots and less was translocated to shoots with a 14C-chloramben plus naptalam treatment than with a 14C-chloramben alone treatment. Naptalam appeared to influence chloramben metabolism. In various plant parts, concentrations of chloramben and its metabolites differed between the two treatments.

Keywords

Chloramben, 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acidnaptalam, 2-[(1-naphthalenylamino)carbonyl]benzoic acidcucumber, Cucumis sativus L. ‘Addis’Herbicide safeningantidoteprotectant
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 27 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1986. Union Carbide 1986 Chemical Guide. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Page 39.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1986. Weed Control Manual 1986 and Herbicide Guide. Ag Consultant and Fieldman. Meister Publ. Co., Willoughby, OH 44094. Pages 196–197.Google Scholar
3. Baker, R. S. and Warren, G. F. 1962. Selective herbicidal action of amiben on cucumber and squash. Weeds 10:219–224.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1965. Herbicide metabolism: N-glycoside of amiben isolated from soybean plants. Science 150:619–620.Google Scholar
5. Colby, S. R. 1966. The mechanism of selectivity of amiben. Weeds 14:197–201.Google Scholar
6. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1940. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. 347. California Agric. Exp. Stn. 32 pp.Google Scholar
7. Knerr, L. D. and Hopen, H. J. 1989. Naptalam as a safener against the phytotoxic effects of chloramben in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. ‘Addis’). Weed Technol. 3:445–449.Google Scholar
8. Lay, M. M. and Casida, J. E. 1976. Dichloracetamide antidotes enhance thiocarbamate sulfoxide detoxification by elevating corn root glutathione content and glutathione-S-transferase activity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:442–456.Google Scholar
9. Miller, J. C. Jr., Penner, D., and Baker, L. R. 1973. Basis for variability in the cucumber for tolerance to chloramben methyl ester. Weed Sci. 21:207–211.Google Scholar
10. Monaco, T. J. and Miller, C. H. 1972. Herbicide activity in close-spaced, pickling cucumbers. Weed Sci. 20:545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Price, T. P. and Balke, N. E. 1982. Characterization of rapid atrazine absorption by excised velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) roots. Weed Sci. 30:633–639.Google Scholar
12. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1968. Amiben metabolism and selectivity. Weed Sci. 16:283–288.Google Scholar
13. Stoller, E. W. 1969. The kinetics of amiben absorption and metabolism as related to species sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 44:854–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Sussman, M. R. and Gardner, G. 1980. Solubilization of the receptor for N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid. Plant Physiol. 66:1074–1078.Google Scholar
15. Sussman, M. R. and Goldsmith, M.H.M. 1981. The action of specific inhibitors of auxin transport on uptake of auxin and binding of N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid to a membrane site in maize coleoptiles. Planta 152:13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Swanson, C. R., Hodgson, R. H., Kadunce, R. E., and Swanson, H. R. 1966. Amiben metabolism in plants II. Physiological factors in N-glucosyl amiben formation. Weeds 14:323–327.Google Scholar
17. Swanson, C. R., Kadunce, R. E., Hodgson, R. H., and Frear, D. S. 1966. Amiben metabolism in plants 1. Isolation and identification of an N-glucosyl complex. Weeds 14:319–323.Google Scholar
18. Thomson, K. S., Hertel, R., and Müller, S. 1973. 1-N-Naphthylphthalamic acid and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid: In vitro binding to particulate cell fractions and action of auxin transport in corn coleoptiles. Planta 109:337–353.Google Scholar
19. Thomson, K. S. and Leopold, A. C. 1974. In vitro binding of morphactins and 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid in corn coleoptiles and their effects on auxin transport. Planta 115:259–270.Google Scholar