Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-n2sc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T14:11:33.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Lanolin or Lanolin + Starch Rings on Absorption and Translocation of 2,4-D or Glyphosate in Hemp Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. E. Schultz  and
O. C. Burnside
M. E. Schultz
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
O. C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lanolin or lanolin + corn (Zea mays L.) starch rings are often used as barriers on leaves to prevent runoff of foliarly applied 14C-herbicide treatments. A preliminary experiment showed that 64 and 90% of the applied 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] and 57 and 87% of the applied glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] was adsorbed to or absorbed into a lanolin and lanolin + starch ring, respectively, during 6 days on a glass slide. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-D in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.) was decreased from 26% down to 16 or 17% of the total applied when a lanolin or lanolin + starch ring was used. Glyphosate absorption and translocation increased with the lanolin ring but not with the lanolin + starch ring. Distribution of the translocated 2,4-D and glyphosate was also altered by use of the ring barriers. Results indicate that one should avoid use of the lanolin ring in 14C-herbicide absorption studies to simulate field conditions.

Keywords

Foliar applicationherbicide uptakephytotoxicitypostemergenceradioactivesurfactants
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 149 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S. 1956. I. The mechanism of translocation: Methods of study with 14C-labeled 2,4-D. Hilgardia 26:287–334.Google Scholar
2. Mull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Residue Rev. 31:1–155.Google Scholar
3. Hull, H. M., Morton, H. L., and Wharrie, J. R. 1975. Environmental influences on cuticle development and resultant foliar penetration. Bot. Rev. 41:421–452.Google Scholar
4. Kern, A. D., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Uptake, movement, and metabolism of cyanazine in fall panicum, green foxtail, and corn. Weed Sci. 23:277–282.Google Scholar
5. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamezewski, K. A. 1977. Uptake and translocation of bentazon with additives. Weed Sci. 25:309–315.Google Scholar
6. Richardson, R. G. 1977. A review of foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Weed Res. 17:259–272.Google Scholar
7. Smith, L. W. and Foy, C. L. 1966. Penetration and distribution studies in bean, cotton, and barley from foliar and root applications of Tween 20-14C, fatty acid and oxyethylene labeled. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66:117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, mobility, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.Google Scholar
9. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557–566.Google Scholar
10. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C-labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191.Google Scholar
11. Zandstra, B. H. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1977. Movement and activity of glyphosate in purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 25:268–272.Google Scholar