Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:17:42.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Herbicides on Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) Interference in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James C. Holloway Jr.  and
David R. Shaw
James C. Holloway Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ivyleaf morningglory weed-free period, weedy period, and density studies were conducted in 1993 and 1994 to determine the effects of soil-applied imazaquin and chlorimuron plus metribuzin on ivyleaf morningglory interference in soybean. A weed-free period of 4 wk was needed to maintain soybean yield equivalent to weed-free season long when herbicides were not used, but treatment with either chlorimuron plus metribuzin or imazaquin maintained yield comparable to weed-free at all intervals. Ivyleaf morningglory biomass was reduced by both herbicides across all weed-free periods. The period nontreated ivyleaf morningglory plants were tolerated without yield loss was only 2 wk, but this interval was extended to 8 wk after treatment with chlorimuron plus metribuzin or imazaquin. Without herbicides, soybean yield was reduced by four ivyleaf morningglory per m of row, but the highest population evaluated in this study (eight per m of row) did not reduce soybean yield after treatment with chlorimuron plus metribuzin or imazaquin. Ivyleaf morningglory biomass was reduced at all densities after treatment with either herbicide.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. ♯ IPOHEsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 5452.’Weed-free periodweedy perioddensitycompetitioninterferencechlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinIPOHE
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 860 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adcock, T. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Effects of preemergence herbicides on the competitiveness of selected weeds. Weed Sci. 39: 54–56.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1994. 1994 Weed control guidelines for Mississippi. Miss. Coop. Ext. Ser. Pub. 1532, Mississippi State Univ., Miss. State, MS.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22: 600–603.Google Scholar
4. Baysinger, J. A. and Sims, B. A. 1991. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39: 358–362.Google Scholar
5. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. Pages 164–181 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
6. Bridges, D. C. 1992. Economic losses due to weeds in southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 386.Google Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20: 294–297.Google Scholar
8. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27: 562–565.Google Scholar
9. Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12: 109–112.Google Scholar
10. Cordes, R. C. and Bauman, T. T. 1984. Field competition between ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36: 364–370.Google Scholar
11. Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1978. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26: 484–488.Google Scholar
12. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 400–404.Google Scholar
13. Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Coop. Ext. Ser. Special report 80.Google Scholar
14. Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans, (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2: 355–363.Google Scholar
15. Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36: 345–353.Google Scholar
16. Hinson, C. and Hanson, W. D. 1962. Competition studies in soybeans. Crop Sci. 2: 117–123.Google Scholar
17. Houston, W. 1970. The ten worst weeds of field crops—morningglory. Crop Soils Mag. 23: 9–10.Google Scholar
18. Little, D. L. and Shaner, D. L. 1991. Absorption and translocation of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 54–69 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
19. McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1975. Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci. 23: 386–390.Google Scholar
20. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20: 56–59.Google Scholar
21. Murdock, E. C., Banks, P. A., and Toler, J. E. 1986. Shade development effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference with soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 34: 711–717.Google Scholar
22. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24: 482–488.Google Scholar
23. Radford, A. E., Ahles, B. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Page 866. The Univ. of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
24. Scott, H. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. II. Development and distribution of root system. Weed Sci. 24: 454–460.Google Scholar
25. Shaw, D. R., Wixson, M. B., and Smith, C. A. 1991. Effect of imazaquin and chlorimuron plus metribuzin on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Stahler, L. M. 1948. Shade and soil moisture as factors in competition between selected crops and field bindweed. Agron. J. 40: 490–502.Google Scholar
27. Thullen, R.J. and Keeley, P. E. 1983. Germination, growth and seed production of Ipomoea hederacea when planted at monthly intervals. Weed Sci. 31: 837–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Walker, R. H., Patterson, M. G., Hauser, E., Isenhour, D. J., Todd, J. W., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Effects of insecticide, weed-free period, and row spacing on soybean (Glycine max) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) growth. Weed Sci. 32: 702–706.Google Scholar
29. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16: 462–465.Google Scholar
30. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationship in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49: 440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1979. Morningglory competition on soybeans. Weed Sci. 27: 531–535.Google Scholar
32. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition. A review. Int. Plant Prot. Ctr., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 195 pp.Google Scholar