Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:07:17.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Height of Directed Applications of Herbicides in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K.C. Hamilton  and
H.F. Arle
K.C. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Agron., Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn., Tucson, AZ 85721 and Pheonix, AZ 85040
H.F. Arle
Affiliation:
Agron., Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn., Tucson, AZ 85721 and Pheonix, AZ 85040
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea], and prometryn [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] were applied postemergence in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) 50 cm high as directed sprays covering (a) the furrow and base of cotton plants or (b) covering the lower half of cotton plants. Herbicides directed to the base of plants caused little or no chlorosis of cotton foliage. When applied to the lower half of cotton plants, linuron caused the most injury to foliage; diuron, the least symptoms. Herbicides directed to base or lower half of cotton plants did not significantly reduce yields, alter boll components or fiber properties, and controlled broadleaved weeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 1977 , pp. 492 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1974. Height of postemergence applications of herbicides in cotton. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. pp. 102–103.Google Scholar
2. Arle, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1974. Linuron-trifluralin combinations in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 22:355–357.Google Scholar
3. Arle, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1975. Height of postemergence applications of herbicides in cotton. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. p. 81.Google Scholar
4. Arle, H.F. and Hamilton, K.C. 1976. Over-the-top applications of herbicides in cotton. Weed Sci. 24:166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Baker, R.S., Arle, H.F., Miller, J.H., and Holston, J.T. Jr. 1969. Effect of organic arsenical herbicides on cotton response and chemical residues. Weed Sci. 17:37–40.Google Scholar
6. Gossett, B.J. and Starnes, J. 1972. Response of cotton to topical applications of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:147.Google Scholar
7. Hamilton, K.C. and Arle, H.F. 1971. Herbicide combinations in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 19:178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hamilton, K.C. and Arle, H.F. 1970. Directed applications of herbicides in irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 18:85–88.Google Scholar