Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:23:00.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Galerucella spp. feeding on seed production in purple loosestrife

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Elizabeth J. Stamm Katovich ,
David W. Ragsdale ,
Luke C. Skinner  and
Roger L. Becker
David W. Ragsdale
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Luke C. Skinner
Affiliation:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN 55155
Roger L. Becker
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of shoot feeding by the biocontrol agents, Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) seed production and seed germination was quantified in two Minnesota wetlands. In a wet meadow where Galerucella spp. were present on isolated plants, feeding by adults and larvae during shoot elongation resulted in stunting and malformation of shoot tips. There was a subsequent reduction in purple loosestrife inflorescence length and number of flower buds and seed capsules. As Galerucella spp. larvae preferentially fed on shoot meristems, even low levels of feeding on a whole-plant basis (approximately 10% defoliation) reduced seed production. In a sedge meadow wetland with severe feeding damage (a minimum of 70% leaf defoliation), few to no flower buds formed on plants, and subsequently, few to no seed capsules were produced on purple loosestrife plants. Of the few capsules that were produced, number of seeds per capsule and percent germination of seeds did not differ from control plants. In both wetlands, feeding on a main shoot of purple loosestrife did not result in a compensatory increase in the number of axillary inflorescences. Feeding by Galerucella spp. and the subsequent reduction in number of seeds produced on purple loosestrife plants will decrease the number of seeds available for dissemination to new sites. Fewer seeds will enter the seedbank, and over time, feeding by Galerucella spp. will decrease the number of seeds available for seedling recruitment. The benefit of leaf defoliation on purple loosestrife plants caused by Galerucella spp. feeding has been reported. In this study, we have quantified the additional benefits of reduced seed production from Galerucella spp. feeding on purple loosestrife in North America.

Keywords

Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria LYTSAGalerucella calmariensis; Galerucella pusillaBiological controlseed germinationseed numberseed productionLYTSA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 190 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, N. O. and Ascher, P. D. 1993. Male and female fertility of loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 118:851–858.Google Scholar
Blossey, B. B. 1995. Impact of Galerucella pusilla and G. calmariensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on field populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Pages 27–31 In Delfosse, E. S. and Scott, R. R., eds. Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Melbourne: DSIR/CSIRO.Google Scholar
Blossey, B. and Schroeder, D. 1986. A Survey for Arthropods and Fungi that Attack the Weed Lythrum salicaria in Selected Areas in Northern Europe. DeLémont, Switzerland: Report International Institute of Biological Control. 27 p.Google Scholar
Blossey, B., Schroeder, D., Hight, S. D., and Malecki, R. A. 1995. Coexistence of two leaf-beetles in the same fundamental niche. Distribution, adult phenology and oviposition. Oikos 74:225–234.Google Scholar
Cowardin, L. M., Carter, B., Golet, F. C., and LaRoe, E. T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. 103 p.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1865. On the sexual relations of the three forms of Lythrum salicaria . J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Bot. 8:169–196.Google Scholar
Grabe, D. F., ed. 1970. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook for Agricultural Seeds. Madison, WI: Tetrazolium Testing Committee of the Association of Official Seed Analysts Contribution 29. 62 p.Google Scholar
Grevstad, F. S. and Herzig, A. L. 1997. Quantifying the effects of distance and conspecifics on colonization: experiments and models using the loosestrife leaf beetle, Galerucella calmariensis . Oecologia 110:60–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, M. and King, C. 1981. 100 Families of Flowering Plants. New York: Cambridge University Press. 567 p.Google Scholar
Hight, S. D. and Drea, J. J. Jr. 1991. Prospects for a classical biological control project against purple loosestrife. Nat. Areas J. 11:151–157.Google Scholar
Hulten, E. 1971. The Circumpolar Plants. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 463 p.Google Scholar
Katovich, E.J.S., Becker, R. L., and Ragsdale, D. W. 1999. Effect of Galerucella spp. on survival of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) roots and crowns. Weed Sci. 47:360–365.Google Scholar
Loos, A. and Ragsdale, D. 1998. Biological Control of Purple Loosestrife: A Guide for Rearing Leaf-Feeding Beetles. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Extension Service Publ. FO-7080. 12 p.Google Scholar
Mal, T. K., Lovett-Doust, J., and Mulligan, G. A. 1992. The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria . Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:1305–1306.Google Scholar
McAvoy, T. J., Kok, L. T., and Mays, W. T. 1997. Phenology of an established population of Galerucella calmariensis (L.) and G. pusilla (Duft.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L. (Lythraceae), in southwest Virginia. Biol. Control 9:106–111.Google Scholar
Ottenbreit, K. A. 1991. The Distribution, Reproductive Biology and Morphology of Lythrum Species, Hybrids and Cultivars in Manitoba. . University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 145 p.Google Scholar
Shamsi, S.R.A. and Whitehead, F. H. 1974. Comparative eco-physiology of Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrum salicaria L. I. General biology, distribution and germination. J. Ecol. 62:279–290.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. Q., Stuckey, R. L., and Thompson, E. B. 1987. Impact and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Res. No. 2. 55 p.Google Scholar
Welling, C. H. and Becker, R. L. 1990. Seed bank dynamics of Lythrum salicaria L.: implications for control of this species in North America. Aquat. Bot. 38:303–309.Google Scholar
Welling, C. H. and Becker, R. L. 1993. Reduction of purple loosestrife establishment in Minnesota wetlands. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21:56–64.Google Scholar