Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:05:24.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of environment on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) leaf wax and fluazifop-P absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Harlene M. Hatterman-Valenti ,
Abelino Pitty  and
Micheal D. K. Owen
Harlene M. Hatterman-Valenti
Affiliation:
Plants Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
Abelino Pitty
Affiliation:
Carrera de Ciencia y Producción Agropecuaria, Zamorano, P.O. Box 93, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Controlled-environment experiments were conducted to determine giant foxtail epicuticular wax (ECW) deposition and fluazifop-P absorption under different environmental conditions and with two adjuvants. Drought stress and low temperature increased leaf ECW content, whereas low light intensity decreased ECW content compared with medium light intensity. Drought stress conditions decreased the fatty acid and primary alcohol content of ECW and increased the hydrocarbon content compared with field capacity. Compositional changes would make the ECW more hydrophobic and reduce leaf wetting by herbicide spray. Increasing air temperature decreased the aldehyde content of ECW, whereas decreasing light intensity increased ECW fatty acid and aldehyde content while decreasing primary alcohols and esters. Compositional changes under low light intensity would make the ECW more hydrophilic and increase leaf wetting by a herbicide spray. Drought stress reduced fluazifop-P absorption regardless of the temperature but could not further reduce fluazifop-P absorption under low light intensity. Fluazifop-P absorption by plants under low light and drought stress conditions was similar to plants under low or medium light intensity and field capacity conditions. Similarly, the rate of fluazifop-P absorption was less under drought stress and low light conditions. Fluazifop-P absorption was greater when crop oil concentrate was added compared with 28% urea ammonium nitrate or no additive. Crop oil concentrate, added to the herbicide solution, overcame reduced fluazifop-P absorption under the low light conditions and in one of the two drought stress regimes but could not overcome reduced fluazifop-P absorption with the high temperature regime.

Keywords

Fluazifop-Pgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herr. SETFADrought stresstemperaturelight intensityherbicide absorptionepicuticular wax quality
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 607 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, E. A. 1974. The influence of environment on leaf wax development in Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera. New Phytol 73:955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. A. and Bukovac, M. J. 1971. Characterization of the components of plant cuticles in relation to the penetration of 2,4-D. Ann. Appl. Biol 67:243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. 1979. Genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants: a case for sorghum. Pages 429–445 in Mussel, H. and Staples, R. C. eds. Stress Physiology in Crop Plants. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bondada, B. R., Oosterhuis, D. M., Murphy, J. B., and Kim, K. S. 1996. Effect of water stress on the epicuticular wax composition and ultrastructure of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf, bract, and boll. Environ. Exp. Bot 36:61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 1992. Drought stress reduces fluazifop-P activity on green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 40:20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two-or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, G. V., Bulawa, M. C., McWhorter, C. G., and Hanks, J. E. 1992. Use of surface relationship models to predict the spreading of nonaqueous droplets on johnsongrass. Pages 218–246 in Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems. Volume 11. Philadelphia: ASTM.Google Scholar
Chamel, A. 1988. Foliar uptake of chemicals studies with whole plants and isolated cuticles. Pages 27–50 in Newmann, P. M. ed. Plant Growth and Leaf Applied Chemicals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Chandrasena, J. P. N. R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Some factors affecting the performance of fluazifop-butyl against Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv). Weed Res 26:139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. T., Carr, K. A., and Duncan, H. J. 1979. The influence of morphological differences in bracken pinnules on the foliar uptake of aminotriazole. Ann. Appl. Biol 93:311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, D. 1989. Pre-treatment environmental effects on the uptake, translocation, metabolism and performance of fluazifop-butyl in Elymus repens . Weed Res 29:289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci 28:534–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebercon, A., Blum, A., and Jordon, W. R. 1977. A rapid colorimetric method for epicuticular wax content of sorghum leaves. Crop Sci 17:179–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seedbanks of the U.S. Corn Belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci 40:636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhards, R., Wyse-Pester, D. Y., and Mortensen, D. A. 1996. Spatial stability of weed patches in agricultural fields. Pages 495–504 in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Sydney, Australia: Australian Centre for Precision Agriculture.Google Scholar
Geyer, U. and Schonherr, J. 1990. The effect of the environment on the permeability and composition of Citrus leaf cuticles, I: water permeability of isolated cuticular membranes. Planta 180:147–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafstrom, L. D. Jr. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1988. Uptake and translocation of fluazifop in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 36:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. J., McCann, A. W., Sewell, P. A., and Merrall, G. T. 1982. Foliar uptake of the wild oat herbicide flamprop-methyl by wheat. Pages 303–313 in Dutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E. eds. The Plant Cuticle. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Holloway, P. J. and Challen, S. B. 1966. Thin layer chromatography in the study of natural waxes and their constituents. J. Chromatogr 25:336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Action of the adjuvants on plant surfaces. Pages 26–67 in Hodgsen, R. H. ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Hull, H. M., Morton, H. L., and Wharrie, J. R. 1975. Environmental influences on cuticle development and resultant foliar penetration. Bot. Rev 41:421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, P. G., Johnson, D. A., and Asay, J. H. 1989. Epicuticular wax production, water status and leaf temperature in triticale range species of contrasting visible glaucousness. Can. J. Plant Sci 69:513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordon, W. R., Monk, R. L., Miller, F. R., Rosenow, D. T., Clark, L. E., and Shouse, P. J. 1983. Environmental physiology of sorghum, I: environmental and genetic control of epicuticular wax load. Crop Sci 23:552–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E. 1983. Plant Surfaces. London: Edward Arnold. 93 p.Google Scholar
Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci 32:143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolattukudy, P. E. 1970. Plant waxes. Lipids 5:259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, B., Caseley, J. C., and McCready, C. C. 1983. The effect of pre-treatment temperature on some physiological responses of Avena fatua to difenzoquat and benzoylpropethyl. Asp. Appl. Biol 4:235–244.Google Scholar
Levene, B. C. and Owen, M. D. K. 1995. Effect of moisture stress and leaf age on bentazon absorption in common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 43:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. Epicuticular wax on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Sci 41:475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Skrzypczak, G. A. 1986. Absorption and translocation of fluazifop with additives. Weed Sci 34:572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. and Bukovac, M. J. 1972. Influence of cuticular waxes on penetration of pear leaf cuticle by 1-naphthalene-acetic acid. Pestic. Sci 3:705–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyarzabal, E. S. 1991. Effect of water stress on postemergence herbicide activity. Ph.D. dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames. IA. 178 p.Google Scholar
Pahl, S. J. and Dexter, A. G. 1986. Fluazifop-p phytotoxicity when tank-mixed with various agrochemicals. Proc. North Cent. Weed Contr. Conf 41:22–23.Google Scholar
Premachandra, G. S., Saneoka, H., Fujita, K., and Ogata, S. 1992. Leaf water relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, epicuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficits in sorghum. J. Exp. Bot 43:1569–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rama Das, V. S., Reddy, K. R., Krishna, C. M., Murphy, S. S., and Rao, J. V. S. 1979. Transpirational rates in relation to quality of leaf epicuticular waxes. Indian J. Exp. Biol 17:158–163.Google Scholar
Reed, D. W. and Tukey, H. B. Jr. 1982. Light intensity and temperature effects on epicuticular wax morphology and internal cuticle ultrastructure of carnation and Brussels sprouts leaf cuticles. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 107:417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. A., Rawson, H. M., and Johnson, D. A. 1986. Glaucousness in wheat: its development and effect on water use efficiency, gas exchange and photosynthetic tissue temperatures. Aust. J. Plant Physiol 13:465–473.Google Scholar
Sanchez, F. J., Manzanares, M., de Andres, E. F., Tenorio, J. L., and Ayerbe, L. 2001. Residual transpiration rate, epicuticular wax load and leaf color of pea plants in drought conditions. Influence on harvest index and canopy temperature. Eur. J. Agron 15:57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonherr, J. and Riederer, M. 1989. Foliar penetration and accumulation of organic chemicals in plant cuticles. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 108:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, T., Robertson, G. W., Griffiths, D. W., Birch, A. N. E., and Duncan, G. 1995. Effects of environment on the composition of epicuticular wax from Kale and Swede. Phytochem 40:407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Dan Hess, F. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci 34:811–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, R. N. 1997. Adjuvant combinations with quizalofop for wild oat (Avena fatua) control in peppermint (Mentha piperita). Weed Tech 11:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thankamani, C. K. and Ashokan, P. K. 2002. Chlorophyll and leaf Epicuticular wax contents of black pepper (Piper nigrum) varieties in response to water stress. J. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci 24:943–946.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Thomas, A. G., Leeson, J. Y., Knezevic, S. Z., and Frick, B. L. 2000. Comparison of weed communities in Manitoba ecoregions and crops. Can. J. Plant Sci 80:963–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci 4:215–231.Google Scholar
White, A. D., Heaverlo, C. A., and Owen, M. D. K. 2002. Evaluation of methods to quantify herbicide penetration in leaves. Weed Technol 16:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. E. and Kasperbauer, M. J. 1980. Effect of light and temperature on cuticular fatty acid and fatty alcohol of tobacco. Phytochem 19:1379–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. E. and Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1987. Composition of epicuticular wax on Isocoma leaves. Bot. Gaz 148:12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1983. Effect of environment and adjuvants on the translocation and toxicity of fluazifop in Cynodon dactylon and Sorghum halepense . Asp. Appl. Biol 4:283–290.Google Scholar