Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:18:16.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Chlorsulfuron on the Movement and Fate of Diclofop in Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rex Liebl  and
A. Douglas Worsham
Rex Liebl
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
A. Douglas Worsham
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The basis for chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] caronyl] benzenesulfonamide} antagonism of diclofop {(±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} was investigated in Italian ryegrass [Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) # LOLMU] and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘McNair 1813′). Chlorsulfuron did not affect the chemical stability or volatility of diclofop in spray mixtures over the time and concentration ranges evaluated. Addition of chlorsulfuron (0.11 μg/μl) to a diclofop (2.0 μg/μl) foliar-applied spotting solution did not affect the absorption, translocation, or metabolism of diclofop in 17-day-old Italian ryegrass or wheat. Italian ryegrass and wheat responded differentially to diclofop alone. At 72 h after treatment, 69 and 40% of labeled diclofop penetrated into Italian ryegrass and wheat leaves, respectively. Although little movement of labeled diclofop occurred in either species, more translocated from the treated zone of Italian ryegrass. At 72 h after treatment, the percentages of 14C recovered as parent methyl ester, diclofop (free acid), and conjugates in treated leaf extracts were 9, 62, and 25%, respectively, for Italian ryegrass, and 50, 20, and 29%, respectively, for wheat. Differential penetration and metabolism of diclofop are the probable bases for selectivity between wheat and Italian ryegrass. The antagonism of diclofop caused by chlorsulfuron does not appear to be due to an alteration of the molecular fate of diclofop in Italian ryegrass.

Keywords

Antagonismherbicide interactionselectivity
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 1987 , pp. 623 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1976. Response of monocotyledons to HOE 22870 and HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:266–269.Google Scholar
2. Boldt, P. F., and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Selectivity mechanisms for foliar applications of diclofop-methyl. I. Retention, absorption, translocation, and volatility. Weed Sci. 28:474–477.Google Scholar
3. Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinney, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J. 69:911–913.Google Scholar
4. Brezeanu, A. G., Davis, D. G., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1976. Ultrastructural effects and translocation of methyl-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-phenoxy] propanoate in wheat and wild oat. Can. J. Bot. 54:2038–2048.Google Scholar
5. Cohen, A. S. and Morrison, I. N. 1981. In vitro sensitivity of wheat and oat mitochondria to the selective herbicide, diclofop-methyl. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 16:110–119.Google Scholar
6. Crowley, J. and Prendeville, G. N. 1979. Effect of diclofop-methyl on leaf-cell membrane permeability in wild oat, barley and wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:275–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Donald, W. W. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1980. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl between wheat and wild oat: growth and herbicide metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 49:459–464.Google Scholar
8. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1979. Antagonistic effects of desmedipham on diclofop activity. Weed Sci. 27:539–544.Google Scholar
9. Hall, C., Edgington, L. V., and Switzer, C. M. 1981. Translocation of different 2,4-D, bentazon, diclofop, or diclofop-methyl combinations in oat and soybean. Weed Sci. 30:676–682.Google Scholar
10. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
11. Hoppe, H. H. and Zacher, H. 1982. Inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis in tips of radicles from Zea mays by diclofop-methyl. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 106:287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Jacobson, A., Shimabukuro, R. H., and McMichael, C. 1985. Response of wheat and oat seedlings to root applied diclofop-methyl and 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 24:61–67.Google Scholar
13. Liebl, R. and Worsham, A. D. 1987. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383–387.Google Scholar
14. Lucas, W. J., Wilson, C., and Wright, J. P. 1984. Perturbation of Chara plasmalemma transport function by 2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy)propionic acid. Plant Physiol. 74:61–66.Google Scholar
15. Mersie, W. and Foy, C. L. 1985. Interaction of chlorsulfuron and diclofop on Italian ryegrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:426–431.Google Scholar
16. Morrison, I. N., Owino, M. G., and Stobbe, E. H. 1981. Effects of diclofop on the growth, mitotic index, and structure of wheat and wild oat adventitious roots. Weed Sci. 29:426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Effect of MCPA on 14C-diclofop uptake and translocation. Weed Sci. 30:59–63.Google Scholar
18. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kirkland, K. J. 1984. Chlorsulfuron reduced control of wild oat with diclofop, difenzoquat, and flamprop. Weed Sci. 32:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Qureshi, F. A. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1979. Interaction of diclofop-methyl and MCPA on wild oats. Weed Sci. 27:202–205.Google Scholar
20. Shimabukuro, M. A., Shimabukuro, R. H., and Walsh, W. C. 1982. The antagonism of IAA-induced hydrogen ion extrusion and coleoptile growth by diclofop-methyl. Physiol. Plant. 56:444–452.Google Scholar
21. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1979. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:615–623.Google Scholar
22. Shimabukuro, R. H. and Wright, J. P. 1985. Changes in the membrane electrogenic proton gradient – the basis for antagonistic interaction between diclofop-methyl and 2,4-D. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. Page 83.Google Scholar
23. Taylor, H. F. and Loader, M.P.C. 1984. Research on the control of wild oats and broad-leaved weeds by herbicide mixtures. Outlook Agric. 13:58–68.Google Scholar
24. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat, and green foxtail. Weed Sci. 25:382–385.Google Scholar
25. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat. Weed Sci. 28:371–377.Google Scholar