Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:04:05.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Branched Broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) Infection on the Growth and Photosynthesis of Tomato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Giovanni Mauromicale*
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche, Agrochimiche e delle Produzioni Animali, Via Valdisavoia, 5, Catania 95123, Italy
Antonino Lo Monaco
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche, Agrochimiche e delle Produzioni Animali, Via Valdisavoia, 5, Catania 95123, Italy
Angela M. G. Longo
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Dipartimento di Scienze Agronomiche, Agrochimiche e delle Produzioni Animali, Via Valdisavoia, 5, Catania 95123, Italy
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The influence of the holoparasite branched broomrape on the vegetative growth, leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, and chlorophyll fluorescence of tomato was studied over two growing seasons on plants grown in a commercial greenhouse. The presence of the parasite strongly reduced the aerial biomass by acting as a competing sink for assimilate, but more importantly, by compromising the efficiency of carbon assimilation via a reduction in leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters F0, Fm, Fv, and Fv/Fm were all altered in parasitized plants, indicating that branched broomrape–infected plants are more susceptible to photoinhibition. The degree of damage to the host was not dependent on either the number or the biomass of parasitic plants per host plant. We suggest that the ability to maintain a high photosynthetic rate, leaf chlorophyll content, or both and the ability to minimize photoinhibition can be developed as indirect assays for improved tolerance to branched broomrape.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Araus, J. L., Amaro, T., Voltas, J., Nakkoul, H., and Nachit, M. M. 1998. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection criterion for grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res. 55:209223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. R., Press, M. C., Scholes, J. D., and Qick, W. P. 1996. Interactions between the parasitic angiosperm Orobanche aegyptiaca and its tomato host: growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 133:637642.Google Scholar
Boari, A. and Vurro, M. 2004. Evaluation of Fusarium spp. and other fungi as biological control agents of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa). Biol. Control. 30:212219.Google Scholar
Brault, M., Betsou, F., Jeune, B., Tuquet, C., and Sallé, G. 2007. Variability of Orobanche ramosa populations in France as revealed by cross infestations and molecular markers. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61:272280.Google Scholar
Butler, W. L. and Kitajima, M. 1975. Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 376:116125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, H. and Press, M. C. 1998. Elevated atmospheric CO2 influences the interaction between the parasitic angiosperm Orobanche minor and its host Trifolium repens . New Phytol. 140:6573.Google Scholar
Diana, G. and Castelli, F. 1994. Avversità della coltura del tabacco: piante. Inf. Fitopat. 6:1117. [In Italian].Google Scholar
Flagella, Z., Pastore, D., Campanile, R. G., and Di Fonzo, N. 1995. The quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport evaluated by chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of drought tolerance in durum wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 125:325329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, D. L., Gurney, A. L., Press, M. C., and Scholes, J. D. 1997. Striga hermonthica reduces photosynthesis in sorghum: the importance of stomatal limitations and a potential role for ABA. Plant Cell Environ. 20:483492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibot-Leclerc, S., Corbineau, F., Sallé, G., and Côme, D. 2004. Responsiveness of Orobanche ramosa L. seeds to GR 24 as related to temperature, oxygen availability and water potential during preconditioning and subsequent germination. J. Plant Growth Regul. 43:6371.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Hershenhorn, J., Plakhine, D., Blumenfeld, T., Buxbaum, H., Golan, S., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001. Control of Orobanche aegyptiaca and O. ramosa in potato. Crop Prot. 20:403410.Google Scholar
Graves, J. D., Press, M. C., and Stewart, G. R. 1989. A carbon balance model of the sorghum–Striga hermonthica host–parasite association. Plant Cell Environ. 12:101107.Google Scholar
Haidar, M. A., Bibi, W., and Sidahmed, M. M. 2003. Response of branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) growth and development to various soil amendments in potato. Crop Prot. 22:291294.Google Scholar
Hibberd, J. M., Quick, W. P., Press, M. C., and Scholes, D. J. 1996. The influence of the parasitic angiosperm Striga gesnerioides on the growth and photosynthesis of its host, Vigna unguiculata . J. Exp. Bot. 47:507512.Google Scholar
Hibberd, J. M., Quick, W. P., Press, M. C., and Scholes, J. D. 1998. Can source–sink relations explain responses of tobacco to infection by the root holoparasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua . Plant Cell Environ. 21:333340.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. A. 1992. Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). I. Plant water status and the kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence. Potato Res. 35:2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeschke, W. D. and Hilpert, A. 1997. Sink-stimulated photosynthesis and sink-dependent increase in nitrate uptake: nitrogen and carbon relations of the parasitic association Cuscuta reflexaRicinus communis . Plant Cell Environ. 20:4756.Google Scholar
Khamis, S., Lamaze, T., Lemoine, Y., and Foyer, C. 1990. Adaptation of the photosynthetic apparatus in maize leaves as a result of nitrogen limitation. Relationships between electron transport and carbon assimilation. Plant Physiol. 94:14361443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, G. H. 1988. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol. Plant. 74:566574.Google Scholar
Kreutz, C. A. J. 1995. Orobanche. The European broomrape species. Volume 1. Maastricht Stichting Natuurpublicaties, Limburg. 159.Google Scholar
Larcher, W. 1994. Photosynthesis as a tool for indicating temperature stress events. Pages 261277. in Schulze, E. D. and Caldwell, M. M. Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Berlin Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lima, J. D., Mosquim, P. R., and Da Matta, F. M. 1999. Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in Phaseolus vulgaris as affected by nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency. Photosynthetica. 37:113121.Google Scholar
Lolas, P. C. 1994. Herbicide for control of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Weed Res. 34:205209.Google Scholar
Mauromicale, G., Ierna, A., and Marchese, M. 2006. Chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content in field-grown potato as affected by nitrogen supply, genotype, and plant age. Photosynthetica. 44:7682.Google Scholar
Mauromicale, G., Lo Monaco, A., Longo, A. M. G., and Restuccia, A. 2005a. Soil solarization, a non-chemical method to control branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) and improve the yield of tomato. Weed Sci. 53:877883.Google Scholar
Mauromicale, G., Marchese, M., Restuccia, A., Sapienza, O., Restuccia, G., and Longo, A. M. G. 2005b. Root nodulation and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning in legume crops as affected by soil solarization. Plant Soil. 271:275284.Google Scholar
Mauromicale, G., Restuccia, G., and Marchese, M. 2001. Soil solarization, a non-chemical technique for controlling Orobanche crenata and improving yield of faba bean. Agronomie. 21:757765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musselman, L. J. 1980. The biology of Striga, Orobanche, and other root-parasitic weeds. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 18:463489.Google Scholar
Musselman, L. J. 1986. Taxonomy of Orobanche . Pages 210. in Ter Borg, S. J. Proceedings of a Workshop on Biology and Control of Orobanche . Wageningen, The Netherlands LH/VPO.Google Scholar
Press, M. C. and Graves, J. D. 1991. Carbon relations of angiosperm parasites and their hosts. Pages 5565. in Wegmann, K. and Musselman, L. J. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Progress in Orobanche Research. Tübigen, Germany Eberhart-Karls Universität.Google Scholar
Press, M. C., Smith, S., and Stewart, G. R. 1991. Carbon acquisition and assimilation in parasitic plants. Funct. Ecol. 5:278283.Google Scholar
Qasem, J. R. 1998. Chemical control of branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) in glasshouse grown tomato. Crop Prot. 17:625630.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. R. and Press, M. C. 1990. The physiology and biochemistry of parasitic angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41:127151.Google Scholar
Taylor, A., Martin, J., and Seel, W. E. 1996. Physiology of the parasitic association between maize and witchweed (Striga hermonthica): is ABA involved. J. Exp. Bot. 47:10571065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watling, J. R. and Press, M. C. 1997. How is the relationship between the C4 cereal Sorghum bicolor and the C3 root hemi-parasites Striga hermonthica and Striga asiatica affected by elevated CO2 . Plant Cell Environ. 20:12921300.Google Scholar
Yamada, M., Hidaka, T., and Fukamachi, H. 1996. Heat tolerance in leaves of tropical fruit crops as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 67:3948.Google Scholar
Zehhar, N., Ingouff, M., Bouya, D., and Fer, A. 2002. Possible involvement of gibberellins and ethylene in Orobanche ramosa germination. Weed Res. 42:464469.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. Q., Chen, R. K., Luo, J., Lu, J. L., and Xu, J. S. 2000. Analyses for inheritance and combining ability of photochemical activities measured by chlorophyll fluorescence in the segregating generation of sugarcane. Field Crops Res. 65:3139.Google Scholar
Zonno, M. C., Montemurro, P., and Vurro, M. 2000. Orobanche ramosa, un'infestante parassita in espansione nell'Italia meridionale. Inf. Fitopat. 50:1321. [In Italian].Google Scholar