Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:46:38.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Alachlor, Propachlor, and Prynachlor on GA3-induced Production of Protease and α-Amylase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

V. Sivaji Rao
Affiliation:
Dep. Seed and Veg. Sci., Cornell Univ., Geneva, NY 14456 Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
William B. Duke
Affiliation:
Dep. Seed and Veg. Sci., Cornell Univ., Geneva, NY 14456

Abstract

Alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N(methoxymethyl)-acetanilide], propachlor (2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide) and prynachlor [2-chloro-N-(1-methyl-2-propynyl)acetanilide], inhibited gibberellic acid (GA3),-induced production of protease and α-amylase in deembryonated barley (Hordeum vulgare L, ‘Schuyler’) seed. Production of protease was more sensitive to these herbicides than α-amylase. The degree of inhibition of protease and α-amylase production caused by alachlor was equivalent to that caused by cycloheximide, puromycin and actinomycin-D, known protein and nucleic acid synthesis inhibitors. Higher GA3 concentrations reversed the inhibition of protease and α-amylase synthesis caused by alachlor but did not reduce the effect of alachlor on barley seed germination and growth. It is concluded that the inhibition of protease and α-amylase production by alachlor is perhaps only one of several effects on early seed germination and seedling development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I.O., Sweet, R.D., Duke, W.B., and Minotti, P.L. 1975. Weed response to atrazine and alachlor combinations at low rates. Weed Sci. 23:6770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chrispeels, M.J. and Varner, J.E. 1967. Gibberellic acid-enhanced synthesis and release of α-amylase and ribonuclease by isolated barley aleurone layers. Plant Physiol. 42:398406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Devlin, R.M. and Cunningham, R.P. 1970. The inhibition of gibberellic acid induction of α-amylase activity in barley endosperm by certain herbicides. Weed Res. 10:316320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Duke, W.B., Slife, F.W., Hanson, J.B., and Butler, H.S. 1975. An investigation on the mechanism of action of propachlor. Weed Sci. 23:142147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Filner, P. and Varner, J.E. 1967. A test for de novo synthesis of enzymes: density labelling with H2O18 of barley α-amylase induced by gibberellic acid. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 58: 15201526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Galston, A.W. and Davies, P.J. 1970. Gibberellins. In Control mechanisms in plant development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey. 184 pp.Google Scholar
7. Hamm, Philip C. 1974. Discovery, development and current status of the chloroacetamide herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:541545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Jacobsen, J.V. and Varner, J.E. 1967. Gibberellic acid-induced synthesis of protease by isolated aleurone layers of barley. Plant Physiol. 42:15961600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Jones, R.L. and Varner, J.E. 1967. The bioassay of gibberellins. Planta 87:155161.Google Scholar
10. Knake, E.L. and Wax, L.M. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:393395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Khan, A.A. 1971. Cytokinins: permissive role in seed germination. Science 171:853859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Mann, J.D., Jordan, L.S. and, Day, B.E. 1965. A survey of herbicides for their effect upon protein synthesis. Plant Physiol. 40:840843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Moreland, D.E., Malhotra, S.S., Gruenhagen, R.D., and Shokrah, E.H. 1969. Effects of herbicides on RNA and protein synthesis. Weed Sci. 17: 556563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Varner, J.E. and Chandra, G.R. 1964. Hormonal control of enzyme synthesis in barley endosperm. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 52:100106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed