Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:05:11.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Adjuvants on Herbicide Efficacy in Controlling Weeds in Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jay G. Varshney
Affiliation:
Rajasthan Agric. Univ. (formerly Sukhadia Univ.), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
H. G. Singh
Affiliation:
Rajasthan Agric. Univ. (formerly Sukhadia Univ.), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Two adjuvants, Triton 11 XE (Isoctyl phenyl polyethoxy ethanol) and urea were tank mixed with four herbicides, methabenzthiazuron [N-(benzothiazol-2-yl)N,N′-dimethyl urea] at 1.0 and 1.5 kg ai/ha, terbutryn [N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N′-ethyl-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] at 0.50 and 0.75 kg/ha, metoxuron [N-3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)N,N-dimethylurea] at 1.0 and 1.75 kg/ha, and isoproturon [(N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea] at 0.50 and 0.75 kg/ha and applied to weeds in wheat. Metoxuron reduced weed dry matter by 90% over a 2-yr period. Isoproturon, terbutryn, and methabenzthiazuron reduced weed dry matter by 82%. Tank-mixing of Triton 11 XE at 0.5% (v/v) with metoxuron at 1.0 kg ai/ha, terbutryn at 0.5 kg/ha, isoproturon at 0.5 kg/ha, and methabenzthiazuron at 1.0 kg/ha reduced weed density and biomass by 52 to 67% and enhanced grain yield by 33% over herbicide alone. None of the herbicides had any significant interaction with adjuvants in terms of weed control and grain yield.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhardwaj, R.B.L. 1980. Relative effectiveness of some broad spectrum herbicides in controlling grass weeds in wheat Indian Soc. Weed Sci. Orissa Univ. Agric. Tech. Weed Sci. Conf. Bhubaneshwar (India).Google Scholar
2. Chow, P.N.P. and Taylor, H. F. 1980. Improved herbicidal performance of DPX 4189 on oilseeds rape by addition of surfactants. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds. 2328.Google Scholar
3. Chwedoruk, A. and Domanska, H. 1980. The influence of oil additives on the effectiveness of herbicides. Acta Agrobot. 33:131137.Google Scholar
4. Del Campo, F. P. 1976. The use of herbicides in wheat Investigation. Progresso Agricola 8:3840.Google Scholar
5. Fisher, S.R.A. 1947. The design of experiments. Olive and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
6. Grewal, D. S. 1982. Crop geometry relative to efficient solar energy and source sink relationships studies in wheat. Ph.D. (Agron.) Thesis. Punjab Agric. Univ., Ludhiana.Google Scholar
7. Joshi, N. C. 1973. Status of weed control in India. Pesticides 7:1718 & 23.Google Scholar
8. Lee, G. A. and Englert, D. D. 1976. Influence of surfactants on the phytotoxicity of HOE 23408. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 29:8586.Google Scholar
9. Pandey, J., Sharma, N. N., and Singh, C. P. 1980. Herbicidal control of grass weeds in wheat in calcareous soils of N. Bihar. Pesticides 14:2223.Google Scholar
10. Rao, A. N. 1979. Weed control in wheat fields. Response of wheat var. Malavraj against five herbicides. Abstr. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. Marathwada Agric. Univ. Weed Sci. Conf. 1979. Parbhani (India).Google Scholar
11. Sharma, V. S. 1976. Surfactants and herbicide efficiency. Planter's Chronicle 71:3746.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, M., Ayers, J. P., and Turner, D. J. 1982. Effect of surfactants and soils on the phytotoxicity of difenzoquat to Avena fatua, barley and wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 100:353363.Google Scholar