Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:41:53.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect and Persistence of Herbicides Applied to Soil in Puerto Rican Forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clyde C. Dowler ,
Wilson Forestier  and
F. H. Tschirley
Clyde C. Dowler
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Experiment Station, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Wilson Forestier
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Experiment Station, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
F. H. Tschirley
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Experiment Station, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six herbicides were applied at 3, 9, and 27 lb/A to the soil in forests of three types in Puerto Rico. The forests differed in soil type, amount and pattern of rainfall, and species composition. Defoliation occurred slowly, but the correlation between percentage defoliation and plants killed was significant at the 1% level of probability. Some defoliation was evident 1 month after treatment and increased slowly during the next 6 to 8 months. The most effective herbicide was 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram). Generally, 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid (dicamba), 2-methoxy-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (prometone), and 5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil (bromacil) were less effective than picloram. Both 2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid (fenac) and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea (diuron) were ineffective. Defoliation was greatest and more plants were killed in the driest site.

One year after treatment, fenac was the most persistent herbicide in the soil. Herbicides were found to a 36 to 48-in depth within 3 months after application.

Herbaceous and woody seedlings were present at all sites within 18 months after herbicide application. There was no definite relationship between herbicidal treatment and secondary succession, except that the number and frequency of successional species were greater on plots having the highest percentage of defoliation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beard, J. S. 1948. The natural vegetation in the windward and leeward islands. Oxford Forestry Mem. 21. 192 p.Google Scholar
2. Beveridge, A. E. 1957. Arboricide trials in lowland dipterocarp rain forest of Malaya. The Malayan Forester 20:211–225.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Davis, F. S., Merkle, M. G., Meyer, R. E., Morton, H. L., and Bouse, L. F. 1965. Defoliation and control of brush. Proc. SWC 18:288–292.Google Scholar
4. Dawkins, R. C. 1957. Contact arboricides for rapid tree weeding in tropical forests. Trop. Silvicult. FAO Collection No. 13(2): 109–112.Google Scholar
5. Frissel, M. J. and Holt, C. H. 1952. Interaction between certain ionizable organic compounds (herbicides) and clay minerals. Soil Sci. 94:284–291.Google Scholar
6. Gibbs, Carter B. 1959. Amines of 2,4-D hold promise for hardwood control. Down to Earth 15(3):6.Google Scholar
7. Mayo-Menendez, Enrique. 1964. Eliminacion de arboles indeseables mediante agentes quimicos. Rev. Interamer. Ciencias Agr. Turrialba 14(4): 196–202.Google Scholar
8. Merkle, M. G., Bovey, R. W., and Hall, R. 1966. The determination of picloram residues in soil gas chromatography. Weeds 14:161–164.Google Scholar
9. Nation, Hoyt A. 1965. Woody plant control on utility rights-of-way with “Tordon” herbicide pellets. Proc. SWC 18:387–391.Google Scholar
10. Schweizer, E. E. and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1966. Persistence of five cotton herbicides in four southern soils. Weeds 14:22–26.Google Scholar
11. Sposta, J. W. 1960. Eliminacion de especies tropicales in-feriores por medio de substancias quimicas. Apuntes Forest. No. 4. Trop. Forest Res. Center, Rio Piedras, Ruerto Rico. 1 p.Google Scholar
12. Thiegs, B. J. 1962. Microbial decomposition of herbicides. Down to Earth 18(2):7–10.Google Scholar
13. Tschirley, F. H. 1967. Problems in woody plant control evaluation in the tropics. Weeds 15:233–237.Google Scholar
14. Tschirley, F. H., Dowler, Clyde C., and Duke, J. A. Species diversity in two plant communities of Puerto Rico. A Tropical Rain Forest (In Publication).Google Scholar
15. Watson, A. J. and Mesler, B. J. Jr. 1964. Effect of tordon herbicide as basal frill and tree injection treatments on certain hardwood trees. Down to Earth 19(4):20–23.Google Scholar
16. Watson, A. J. and Wiltse, M. G. 1963. Tordon … for brush control on utility rights-of-way in the eastern United States. Down to Earth 19(1): 11–14.Google Scholar
17. Wyatt-Smith, J. 1960. Further arboricide trials in lowland Dipterocarp rain forest of Malaya. The Malayan Forester 23:314–331.Google Scholar
18. Wyatt-Smith, J. 1961. Arboricide trials using ammate X, 2,3-D, 2,4,5-T, and sodium arsenite. The Malayan Forester 24:81–84.Google Scholar