Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T21:27:49.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecotypic Variation of Tamarix pentandra Epicuticular Wax and Possible Relationship with Herbicide Sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Wilkinson
R. E. Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Georgia Stn., Experiment, GA 30212
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six ecotypes of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pall.), an introduced competitive phreatophyte, were collected from Wyoming to Texas and grown at Los Lunas, New Mexico. Cladophyll epicuticular alkane and fatty acid contents were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography. Fatty acid and alkane contents varied among the six morphologically-indistinguishable ecotypes. Alkane content patterns varied on the basis or absence of C39 and other constituents. Fatty acid contents of the C16 to C22 were different among the ecotypes. Variation was not explicable on the basis of latitude, light intensity, temperature, nutrition, or water status. Thus, the chemical taxonomy hypothesis of uniform epicuticular alkane quality within a species is not substantiated in saltcedar, and a portion of the ecotypic resistance to postemergence herbicide sprays may be due to differences in epicuticular wax quantity and quality.

Keywords

Tamaricaceaecladophyllalkanesfatty acidsecotypes
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 110 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F., Bowser, C. W., and McRae, G. N. 1962. Chemical control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra) . Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Control Conf. p. 18.Google Scholar
2. Cords, H. P. and Badiei, A. A. 1964. Root reserves and susceptibility to systemic herbicides in two phreatophytes. Weeds 12:299–301.Google Scholar
3. Hughes, E. E. 1966. Single and combination mowing and spraying treatments for control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pall.) Weeds 14:276–278.Google Scholar
4. Hughes, E. E. 1966. Results of field applications of herbicides for control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.). U.S. Dep. Agric, Agric. Res. Serv., ARS-34-79. 19 pp.Google Scholar
5. Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Residue Rev. 31:1–155.Google Scholar
6. Jellum, M. D. and Worthington, R. E. 1966. A rapid method of fatty acid analysis of oil from individual corn (Zea mays L.) kernels. Crop Sci. 6:251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Martin, J. T. 1960. Determination of the components of plant cuticles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 11:635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Quimby, P. C. Jr., Hollingsworth, E. B., and McDonald, R. L. 1977. Techniques for greenhouse evaluation of herbicides on saltcedar. Weed Sci. 25:1–4.Google Scholar
9. Swain, T. 1963. Chemical Plant Taxonomy. Acad. Press, New York. 543 pp.Google Scholar
10. Wilkinson, R. E. 1966. Seasonal development of anatomical structures of saltcedar foliage. Bot. Gaz. 127:231–234.Google Scholar
11. Wilkinson, R. E. 1966. Reproduction of saltcedar by cuttings. Weeds 14:173–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wilkinson, R. E. 1972. Sicklepod hydrocarbon response to photoperiod. Phytochemistry 11:1273–1280.Google Scholar
13. Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Sicklepod surface wax response to photoperiod and S-(2,3-dichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate (Diallate.). Plant Physiol. 53:269–275.Google Scholar
14. Wilkinson, R. E. and Kasperbauer, M. J. 1972. Epicuticular alkane content of tobacco as influenced by photoperiod, temperature, and leaf age. Phytochemistry 11:2439–2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar