Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:02:23.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Comparison of Mechanical and Chemical Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, School of Agriculture, Carbondale, Illinois
J. K. Leasure
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, School of Agriculture, Carbondale, Illinois
Mitchell R. Corbin
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, School of Agriculture, Carbondale, Illinois

Abstract

The problem in determining the economic feasibility of mechanical, chemical, and combination weed control methods in corn (Zea mays L.) is a complex decision involving many factors. The effects of cost, yield, timeliness, and alternative uses of labor are the factors considered in comparing various methods of weed control in this study. Costs of weed control operations range from $2.84/A for two cultivations to $10.45/A for the most intensive, mechanical-chemical operation studied. Most common weed control methods have costs of approximately $3 to $4/A. Yields range from 83 bu/A for two cultivations to 96 bu/A with the highest cost chemical-mechanical weed control methods. All yields used in this study are supported by agronomic studies and are indexed on the basis of 100 bu/A for weed-free conditions. The consideration of both yields and costs does affect the selection of a weed control method. Considering only these two factors, mechanical methods have a slight advantage over chemical weed control methods. Penalizing mechanical methods because of delay or timeliness characteristics gives chemical methods an advantage by as much as $3.00/A. Alternative uses of labor, even though a common argument in selecting chemical or mechanical methods, is a very small item and has only moderate effects on the changes in net income.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, David L. and Corbin, Mitchell R. 1967. An economic analysis of mechanical and chemical weed control methods in corn. School of Agr. Publ. No. 27, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois. 30 p.Google Scholar
2. Armstrong, David L. and Edwin Farris, J. 1964. Farm machinery: costs, performance rates, and combination. California Agr. Econ. Res. Rep. No. 273. 9 p.Google Scholar
3. Drew, John S. and Van Arsdall, Roy. 1966. The economics of controlling grass weeds in corn production. Illinois Agr. Econ. 6(2):26.Google Scholar
4. Illinois Cooperative Crop Reporting Service. 1948. Chemical weed control by Illinois farmers. Illinois Agr. Statistics, Illinois Dep. Agr. and U.S. Dep. Agr. Bull. 68–2. 7 p.Google Scholar
5. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Control those weeds early. Illinois Res. 18(2):89.Google Scholar
6. Meggitt, William F. 1960. The influence of corn yields when weeds were controlled by herbicides. Proc. NEWCC 14:240246.Google Scholar
7. Staniforth, David W. 1953. Levels of weed infestation as related to yield losses and control practices in corn. Proc. NCWCC 10:4445.Google Scholar