Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:43:03.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drift Comparisons of Low-Expansion Foams and Conventional Sprays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. F. Bouse  and
R. E. Leerskov
L. F. Bouse
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. E. Leerskov
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to compare the drift of low-expansion foam and conventional sprays in a low-speed horizontal wind tunnel under controlled environmental conditions. Dimensions of the tunnel were 1.30 m high, 0.61 m wide, and 7.32 m long. Wind speed was maintained at 1.52 m/sec. Drift was compared for spray solutions, with and without foam adjuvants, using several different types and sizes of air-inducting nozzles and three sizes of conventional fan nozzles. Large drops produced by the air-inducting nozzles, with and without foam adjuvant, resulted in significantly less drift beyond 1.83 and 6.10 m than sprays from the conventional fan nozzles. The addition of foam adjuvant to the spray solution resulted in increased drift beyond 1.83 m for sprays from the air-induction nozzles in several comparisons but did not result in a significant increase in the drift beyond 6.10 m.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , September 1973 , pp. 405 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Butler, B. J., Akesson, N. B., and Yates, W. E. 1969. Use of spray adjuvants to reduce drift. Trans. ASAE (Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng.) 12:182–186.Google Scholar
2. Clack, J. E. 1972. Application of herbicides in foam to reduce drift. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:495–497.Google Scholar
3. Roth, L. O. and Porterfield, J. G. 1970. Spray drop size control. Trans. ASAE (Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng.) 13:779–781, 784.Google Scholar
4. Sachnik, N. 1969. The use of foamicide for the application of herbicides by: aerial, vehicle-mounted spray booms, blowers, and handguns. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:392–396.Google Scholar
5. Smith, D. B., Burt, E. C., and Benci, F. J. 1970. Design of a spinning disc, droplet separator and the determination of the size and density of droplets deposited on cotton foliage. Trans. ASAE (Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng.) 13:665–668.Google Scholar